超越自愿主义。埃默·德·瓦特尔思想中的自然法

Fernando Pérez Godoy
{"title":"超越自愿主义。埃默·德·瓦特尔思想中的自然法","authors":"Fernando Pérez Godoy","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552019000100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen El presente articulo busca esclarecer la relacion entre el pensamiento juridico de Emer de Vattel y el voluntarismo en distintas obras del intelectual suizo hasta ahora poco atendidas en el ambito iberoamericano. En este analisis teorico, se revalora la concepcion de derecho natural de Vattel, topico muchas veces olvidado en comparacion con su famosa teoria sobre derecho de naciones. Se concluye que Vattel reprocho tempranamente un voluntarismo de corte protestante para continuar con esta posicion epistemologica inicial al momento de abordar las relaciones internacionales y negocios de las naciones. Su voluntarismo representa mas el producto de una construccion historiografica moderna ligada al Estado-centrismo de la investigacion internacional que una autentica expresion de su pensamiento legal. EnglishAbstract The following paper explains the connection between the legal thought of Emer de Vattel and the voluntarism thorough different works which are rarely researched in the Ibero-American field. In this theoretical analyze, it revalues the Vattel’s understanding of the natural law, a topic that is commonly under looked in compare with his law of nations’ theory. It concludes that Vattel rejects early the protestant voluntarism in his natural law’s conception, continuing with this epistemological view in his interpretation on the international relations of nations. His voluntarism represents more a historiographical modern construction tied to State-centrism view in international scholarship than an authentic expression of his legal thought.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Más allá del voluntarismo. Derecho natural en el pensamiento de Emer de Vattel\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Pérez Godoy\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0716-54552019000100417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolResumen El presente articulo busca esclarecer la relacion entre el pensamiento juridico de Emer de Vattel y el voluntarismo en distintas obras del intelectual suizo hasta ahora poco atendidas en el ambito iberoamericano. En este analisis teorico, se revalora la concepcion de derecho natural de Vattel, topico muchas veces olvidado en comparacion con su famosa teoria sobre derecho de naciones. Se concluye que Vattel reprocho tempranamente un voluntarismo de corte protestante para continuar con esta posicion epistemologica inicial al momento de abordar las relaciones internacionales y negocios de las naciones. Su voluntarismo representa mas el producto de una construccion historiografica moderna ligada al Estado-centrismo de la investigacion internacional que una autentica expresion de su pensamiento legal. EnglishAbstract The following paper explains the connection between the legal thought of Emer de Vattel and the voluntarism thorough different works which are rarely researched in the Ibero-American field. In this theoretical analyze, it revalues the Vattel’s understanding of the natural law, a topic that is commonly under looked in compare with his law of nations’ theory. It concludes that Vattel rejects early the protestant voluntarism in his natural law’s conception, continuing with this epistemological view in his interpretation on the international relations of nations. His voluntarism represents more a historiographical modern construction tied to State-centrism view in international scholarship than an authentic expression of his legal thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552019000100417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552019000100417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章旨在澄清埃默·德·瓦特尔的法律思想与瑞士知识分子在伊比利亚-美洲领域迄今为止很少关注的不同作品中的自愿主义之间的关系。在这一理论分析中,他重新评估了瓦特尔的自然法概念,与他著名的国际法理论相比,这一主题经常被遗忘。得出的结论是,瓦特尔很早就谴责了新教的自愿主义,以便在处理国际关系和国家事务时继续这一最初的认识论立场。他的自愿主义更多地代表了与国家有关的现代史学建设的产物——国际研究的中心主义,而不是他法律思想的真正表达。以下文件通过伊比利亚-美洲领域很少研究的不同作品,解释了Emer de Vattel的法律思想与自愿主义之间的联系。在这一理论分析中,它重新评估了瓦特尔对自然法的理解,与他的国法理论相比,这是一个经常被忽视的问题。它的结论是,瓦特尔早期在其自然法的概念中拒绝新教自愿主义,并在他对国际国家关系的解释中继续采用这种认识论观点。他的自愿主义更多地代表了与国际学术中的国家中心主义观点有关的现代历史建构,而不是他法律思想的真实表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Más allá del voluntarismo. Derecho natural en el pensamiento de Emer de Vattel
espanolResumen El presente articulo busca esclarecer la relacion entre el pensamiento juridico de Emer de Vattel y el voluntarismo en distintas obras del intelectual suizo hasta ahora poco atendidas en el ambito iberoamericano. En este analisis teorico, se revalora la concepcion de derecho natural de Vattel, topico muchas veces olvidado en comparacion con su famosa teoria sobre derecho de naciones. Se concluye que Vattel reprocho tempranamente un voluntarismo de corte protestante para continuar con esta posicion epistemologica inicial al momento de abordar las relaciones internacionales y negocios de las naciones. Su voluntarismo representa mas el producto de una construccion historiografica moderna ligada al Estado-centrismo de la investigacion internacional que una autentica expresion de su pensamiento legal. EnglishAbstract The following paper explains the connection between the legal thought of Emer de Vattel and the voluntarism thorough different works which are rarely researched in the Ibero-American field. In this theoretical analyze, it revalues the Vattel’s understanding of the natural law, a topic that is commonly under looked in compare with his law of nations’ theory. It concludes that Vattel rejects early the protestant voluntarism in his natural law’s conception, continuing with this epistemological view in his interpretation on the international relations of nations. His voluntarism represents more a historiographical modern construction tied to State-centrism view in international scholarship than an authentic expression of his legal thought.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.
期刊最新文献
Recuerdos de un doctorando (1971-1974) Alejandro Guzmán Brito 1945-2021 Alejandro Guzmán y la interpretación jurídica Homenaje a Alejandro Guzmán Brito Recuerdo de Alejandro Guzmán Brito (1945-1921)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1