在身体敏感部位工作时患者的不当性行为:来自全国物理治疗调查的结果

J. Boissonnault, Ziádee Cambier, S. Hetzel
{"title":"在身体敏感部位工作时患者的不当性行为:来自全国物理治疗调查的结果","authors":"J. Boissonnault, Ziádee Cambier, S. Hetzel","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Career and 12-month prevalence for inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) among physical therapy practitioners is 84% and 47%, respectively. Risk factors include fewer years of patient care, treating patients with cognitive impairment, female-practitioner sex, and male-patient sex. The IPSB risk specific to PT pelvic health practitioners and those treating in sensitive body areas has not been investigated. Objectives: Determine prevalence and risk of IPSB in physical therapy practitioners performing internal examinations and working in sensitive body areas, and whether differences exist in IPSB response-strategies among these practitioners versus general PT respondents. Study Design: Mixed-methods survey research. Methods: A survey fielded through sections of the American Physical Therapy Association and selected PT and physical therapist assistant educational programs in 2016 collected responses to questions on internal examinations and on working in sensitive body areas. Comparisons were made to the general survey respondents. Results: Most IPSB events were unrelated to working in sensitive body areas for general respondents, but occurred significantly more often for pelvic health practitioners (13.8% vs 3.8%; P = .036). Performing internal examinations was not a significant risk factor for IPSB. The pelvic health physical therapists were mostly experienced female practitioners, treating mostly women. They terminated and transferred care to others more often in the face of IPSB. Conclusion: Pelvic health physical therapy practitioners incurred more IPSB when treating sensitive body areas and transferred and terminated care more often than general respondents. Future research may determine whether internal examination is a stand-alone risk factor.","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"43 1","pages":"36–43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inappropriate Patient Sexual Behavior When Working in Sensitive Areas of the Body: Results From a National Physical Therapy Survey\",\"authors\":\"J. Boissonnault, Ziádee Cambier, S. Hetzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Career and 12-month prevalence for inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) among physical therapy practitioners is 84% and 47%, respectively. Risk factors include fewer years of patient care, treating patients with cognitive impairment, female-practitioner sex, and male-patient sex. The IPSB risk specific to PT pelvic health practitioners and those treating in sensitive body areas has not been investigated. Objectives: Determine prevalence and risk of IPSB in physical therapy practitioners performing internal examinations and working in sensitive body areas, and whether differences exist in IPSB response-strategies among these practitioners versus general PT respondents. Study Design: Mixed-methods survey research. Methods: A survey fielded through sections of the American Physical Therapy Association and selected PT and physical therapist assistant educational programs in 2016 collected responses to questions on internal examinations and on working in sensitive body areas. Comparisons were made to the general survey respondents. Results: Most IPSB events were unrelated to working in sensitive body areas for general respondents, but occurred significantly more often for pelvic health practitioners (13.8% vs 3.8%; P = .036). Performing internal examinations was not a significant risk factor for IPSB. The pelvic health physical therapists were mostly experienced female practitioners, treating mostly women. They terminated and transferred care to others more often in the face of IPSB. Conclusion: Pelvic health physical therapy practitioners incurred more IPSB when treating sensitive body areas and transferred and terminated care more often than general respondents. Future research may determine whether internal examination is a stand-alone risk factor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health physical therapy\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"36–43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在物理治疗从业者中,不适当患者性行为(IPSB)的职业和12个月患病率分别为84%和47%。风险因素包括患者护理年限减少、治疗认知障碍患者、女性执业医师性别和男性患者性别。PT骨盆健康从业者和那些在敏感身体区域治疗的人的IPSB风险尚未调查。目的:确定在进行内部检查和在敏感身体区域工作的物理治疗从业者中IPSB的患病率和风险,以及这些从业者与普通PT受访者在IPSB反应策略方面是否存在差异。研究设计:混合方法调查研究。方法:2016年,一项通过美国物理治疗协会各部门和选定的PT和物理治疗师助理教育项目进行的调查收集了对内部检查和在敏感身体区域工作问题的回答。与一般调查的受访者进行了比较。结果:对于一般受访者来说,大多数IPSB事件与在敏感身体区域工作无关,但对于骨盆健康从业者来说,发生率明显更高(13.8%对3.8%;P=0.036)。进行内部检查不是IPSB的重要风险因素。骨盆健康物理治疗师大多是经验丰富的女性从业者,主要治疗女性。面对IPSB,他们更频繁地终止治疗并将护理转移给他人。结论:骨盆健康物理治疗从业者在治疗敏感身体部位时发生了更多的IPSB,并且比一般受访者更频繁地转移和终止护理。未来的研究可能会确定内部检查是否是一个独立的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inappropriate Patient Sexual Behavior When Working in Sensitive Areas of the Body: Results From a National Physical Therapy Survey
Background: Career and 12-month prevalence for inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) among physical therapy practitioners is 84% and 47%, respectively. Risk factors include fewer years of patient care, treating patients with cognitive impairment, female-practitioner sex, and male-patient sex. The IPSB risk specific to PT pelvic health practitioners and those treating in sensitive body areas has not been investigated. Objectives: Determine prevalence and risk of IPSB in physical therapy practitioners performing internal examinations and working in sensitive body areas, and whether differences exist in IPSB response-strategies among these practitioners versus general PT respondents. Study Design: Mixed-methods survey research. Methods: A survey fielded through sections of the American Physical Therapy Association and selected PT and physical therapist assistant educational programs in 2016 collected responses to questions on internal examinations and on working in sensitive body areas. Comparisons were made to the general survey respondents. Results: Most IPSB events were unrelated to working in sensitive body areas for general respondents, but occurred significantly more often for pelvic health practitioners (13.8% vs 3.8%; P = .036). Performing internal examinations was not a significant risk factor for IPSB. The pelvic health physical therapists were mostly experienced female practitioners, treating mostly women. They terminated and transferred care to others more often in the face of IPSB. Conclusion: Pelvic health physical therapy practitioners incurred more IPSB when treating sensitive body areas and transferred and terminated care more often than general respondents. Future research may determine whether internal examination is a stand-alone risk factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Clinical Practice Guidelines: Rehabilitation Interventions for Urgency Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Urgency, and/or Urinary Frequency in Adult Women Running Gait Retraining in the Management of a Multiparous Runner With Chronic Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Case Study New Name, New Format! APTA 2023 Combined Sections Meeting Posters and Platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1