影响非医疗环境中SBIRT实施的因素

Andrew J. Flaherty, Aidyn L Iachini, Melissa C. Reitmeier, D. Dehart
{"title":"影响非医疗环境中SBIRT实施的因素","authors":"Andrew J. Flaherty, Aidyn L Iachini, Melissa C. Reitmeier, D. Dehart","doi":"10.1080/1533256X.2021.2018644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT SBIRT is an evidenced-based intervention model designed to reduce substance use. While initially used in medical settings, SBIRT implementation has evolved into non-medical settings with mixed evidence of effectiveness. This exploratory qualitative study sought to understand what factors influence implementation of SBIRT in non-medical settings. Interviews were conducted with 15 practitioners trained in SBIRT. Findings suggest that eight factors influenced SBIRT implementation in these settings, including compatibility of SBIRT with the setting, staff training/staffing, client factors, time, leadership, policy, available resources, and perception of advantage/efficacy of SBIRT. Implications of these findings for social work practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that influence SBIRT implementation in non-medical settings\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Flaherty, Aidyn L Iachini, Melissa C. Reitmeier, D. Dehart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1533256X.2021.2018644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT SBIRT is an evidenced-based intervention model designed to reduce substance use. While initially used in medical settings, SBIRT implementation has evolved into non-medical settings with mixed evidence of effectiveness. This exploratory qualitative study sought to understand what factors influence implementation of SBIRT in non-medical settings. Interviews were conducted with 15 practitioners trained in SBIRT. Findings suggest that eight factors influenced SBIRT implementation in these settings, including compatibility of SBIRT with the setting, staff training/staffing, client factors, time, leadership, policy, available resources, and perception of advantage/efficacy of SBIRT. Implications of these findings for social work practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2021.2018644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1533256X.2021.2018644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SBIRT是一种基于证据的干预模式,旨在减少物质使用。虽然最初用于医疗环境,但SBIRT的实施已经发展到非医疗环境,其有效性证据不一。本探索性定性研究旨在了解影响非医疗环境中SBIRT实施的因素。对15名接受过SBIRT培训的从业人员进行了访谈。研究结果表明,在这些环境中,有8个因素影响SBIRT的实施,包括SBIRT与环境的兼容性、员工培训/人员配备、客户因素、时间、领导、政策、可用资源和对SBIRT优势/有效性的感知。讨论了这些发现对社会工作实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors that influence SBIRT implementation in non-medical settings
ABSTRACT SBIRT is an evidenced-based intervention model designed to reduce substance use. While initially used in medical settings, SBIRT implementation has evolved into non-medical settings with mixed evidence of effectiveness. This exploratory qualitative study sought to understand what factors influence implementation of SBIRT in non-medical settings. Interviews were conducted with 15 practitioners trained in SBIRT. Findings suggest that eight factors influenced SBIRT implementation in these settings, including compatibility of SBIRT with the setting, staff training/staffing, client factors, time, leadership, policy, available resources, and perception of advantage/efficacy of SBIRT. Implications of these findings for social work practice are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions is designed to help social work practitioners stay abreast of the latest developments in the field of addictions. This journal publishes refereed articles on innovative individual, family, group work, and community practice models for treating and preventing substance abuse and other addictions in diverse populations. The journal focuses on research findings, health care, social policies, and program administration directly affecting social work practice in the addictions. The Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions has several regular features of interest to social workers in the field of addictions.
期刊最新文献
Burnout among behavioral healthcare workers during the pandemic UN-ADDICTION: 6 MIND-CHANGING CONVERSATIONS THAT COULD SAVE A LIFE Notice of duplicate publication: Harmonizing harm reduction: uniting varied perspectives for enhanced social work practice “Living in a chronic state of panic”: family members’ experiences with opioid use disorder Co-occurring disorders among US military veterans: a conversation with Leon Sawh, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1