社会福利量表:葡萄牙语境下的效度和信度证据

A. Lages, Eunice Magalhães, Carla Antunes, C. Ferreira
{"title":"社会福利量表:葡萄牙语境下的效度和信度证据","authors":"A. Lages, Eunice Magalhães, Carla Antunes, C. Ferreira","doi":"10.17575/RPSICOL.V32I2.1334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework.","PeriodicalId":37656,"journal":{"name":"PSICOLOGIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Well-Being Scales: Validity and Reliability Evidence in the Portuguese Context\",\"authors\":\"A. Lages, Eunice Magalhães, Carla Antunes, C. Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.17575/RPSICOL.V32I2.1334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17575/RPSICOL.V32I2.1334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSICOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17575/RPSICOL.V32I2.1334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究旨在为葡萄牙背景下社会福利量表的有效性和可靠性提供证据。对322名成人进行横断面研究(M = 30.45;SD = 8.52),年龄18 ~ 58岁,以女性居多(65.8%)。验证性因子分析表明,考虑到五因素模型与原理论建议一致,模型拟合良好。此外,还获得了额外的效度证据,发现社会福祉维度与生活满意度、抑郁和焦虑之间存在统计学上显著的关联。可靠性数据也显示了所有幸福维度的充分内部一致性。这一可靠和有效的量表有助于评估葡萄牙成人的社会福利,不仅允许对心理健康研究采取更全面的方法,而且还提供了以积极框架为重点的评估和干预机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Well-Being Scales: Validity and Reliability Evidence in the Portuguese Context
This study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PSICOLOGIA
PSICOLOGIA Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal PSICOLOGIA publishes original research in the general scope of psychology and behavioral sciences. PSICOLOGIA welcomes empirical research contributions and literature revisions within specific scientific areas of Psychology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between optimism, pessimism and sleep difficulties in university students: The role of cognitive emotion regulation and psychological distress Separação-individuação aos pais e resiliência nos conflitos no namoro em jovens adultos Mapping personality markers in a Portuguese sample: The factor structure, reliability and incremental validity of the Big Five Mini-Markers Disentangling perceptions of social support and social capital as social determinants of mental health: COVID-19 personal networks of immigrants and non-migrants in Portugal Latent mean differences between men and women: The case of the Preference for the Intuition and Deliberation Scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1