三组不同程度抠皮严重程度的参与者对皮肤电刺激的情感反应

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Cogent Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1080/23311908.2023.2240149
A. Schienle, Florian Osmani
{"title":"三组不同程度抠皮严重程度的参与者对皮肤电刺激的情感反应","authors":"A. Schienle, Florian Osmani","doi":"10.1080/23311908.2023.2240149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Some individuals pick their skin excessively which induces skin lesions. These individuals with high severity of skin-picking (SOSP) usually experience their picking not as painful, although this behavior causes physical harm. This may point to lowered pain sensitivity in individuals with elevated SOSP. A total of 144 participants characterized by three different levels of self-reported SOSP received electrocutaneous pulses of different intensities to the skin surface of their left forearm. A mixed-model analysis of variance tested the effects of SOSP group (no/medium/high skin-picking severity) and stimulus intensity (6,16,26,36 mA) on participants’ ratings for perceived intensity/unpleasantness of stimuli and their own affective state (valence, arousal). Relative to participants who never pick their skin, the medium and high SOSP groups reported feeling more unpleasant and aroused during electrocutaneous stimulation. The three SOSP groups did not differ in the evaluation of the stimuli. It has to be noted that only a limited set of stimulation parameters (one location of stimulation; four stimulus intensities) were included. The present findings suggest that emotional responsivity to skin stimulation (but not pain sensitivity) is an important factor in understanding skin-picking behavior.","PeriodicalId":46323,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affective responses to electrocutaneous stimulation in three groups of participants with different levels of skin-picking severity\",\"authors\":\"A. Schienle, Florian Osmani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23311908.2023.2240149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Some individuals pick their skin excessively which induces skin lesions. These individuals with high severity of skin-picking (SOSP) usually experience their picking not as painful, although this behavior causes physical harm. This may point to lowered pain sensitivity in individuals with elevated SOSP. A total of 144 participants characterized by three different levels of self-reported SOSP received electrocutaneous pulses of different intensities to the skin surface of their left forearm. A mixed-model analysis of variance tested the effects of SOSP group (no/medium/high skin-picking severity) and stimulus intensity (6,16,26,36 mA) on participants’ ratings for perceived intensity/unpleasantness of stimuli and their own affective state (valence, arousal). Relative to participants who never pick their skin, the medium and high SOSP groups reported feeling more unpleasant and aroused during electrocutaneous stimulation. The three SOSP groups did not differ in the evaluation of the stimuli. It has to be noted that only a limited set of stimulation parameters (one location of stimulation; four stimulus intensities) were included. The present findings suggest that emotional responsivity to skin stimulation (but not pain sensitivity) is an important factor in understanding skin-picking behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogent Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogent Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2240149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2240149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Affective responses to electrocutaneous stimulation in three groups of participants with different levels of skin-picking severity
Abstract Some individuals pick their skin excessively which induces skin lesions. These individuals with high severity of skin-picking (SOSP) usually experience their picking not as painful, although this behavior causes physical harm. This may point to lowered pain sensitivity in individuals with elevated SOSP. A total of 144 participants characterized by three different levels of self-reported SOSP received electrocutaneous pulses of different intensities to the skin surface of their left forearm. A mixed-model analysis of variance tested the effects of SOSP group (no/medium/high skin-picking severity) and stimulus intensity (6,16,26,36 mA) on participants’ ratings for perceived intensity/unpleasantness of stimuli and their own affective state (valence, arousal). Relative to participants who never pick their skin, the medium and high SOSP groups reported feeling more unpleasant and aroused during electrocutaneous stimulation. The three SOSP groups did not differ in the evaluation of the stimuli. It has to be noted that only a limited set of stimulation parameters (one location of stimulation; four stimulus intensities) were included. The present findings suggest that emotional responsivity to skin stimulation (but not pain sensitivity) is an important factor in understanding skin-picking behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cogent Psychology
Cogent Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: One of the largest multidisciplinary open access journals serving the psychology community, Cogent Psychology provides a home for scientifically sound peer-reviewed research. Part of Taylor & Francis / Routledge, the journal provides authors with fast peer review and publication and, through open access publishing, endeavours to help authors share their knowledge with the world. Cogent Psychology particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies and also accepts replication studies and negative results. Cogent Psychology covers a broad range of topics and welcomes submissions in all areas of psychology, ranging from social psychology to neuroscience, and everything in between. Led by Editor-in-Chief Professor Peter Walla of Webster Private University, Austria, and supported by an expert editorial team from institutions across the globe, Cogent Psychology provides our authors with comprehensive and quality peer review. Rather than accepting manuscripts based on their level of importance or impact, editors assess manuscripts objectively, accepting valid, scientific research with sound rigorous methodology. Article-level metrics let the research speak for itself.
期刊最新文献
Resilience of Indonesian Navy Wives: effects of self-efficacy and social support Vaccination behavior under uncertainty: a longitudinal study on factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination behavior in Japan with a focus on the effect of close contacts’ vaccination behavior Multinational validation of the Arabic version of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale (AILS) in university students Factorial validity and norms of the German and British-English online Conflict Monitoring Questionnaire Investigating gender and racial-ethnic biases in sentiment analysis of language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1