非交易型REIT业绩:对Mallett和McCann的回应

Thomas M. Selman
{"title":"非交易型REIT业绩:对Mallett和McCann的回应","authors":"Thomas M. Selman","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2022.1.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their Winter 2021 article, “Further on the Returns to Non-Traded REITs,” Joshua Mallett and Craig McCann claimed to have found significantly lower performance for non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) as compared to the performance that investors would have earned in a portfolio of traded REITs. The authors’ analysis suffers from at least four fundamental errors. First, the article erroneously compares the performance of non-traded REITs to a mutual fund that is closed to new investors and that tracks an index of publicly traded REITs. Second, it inappropriately combines data about two types of non-traded REITs: “lifecycle REITs” and “NAV REITs.” Third, it uses a limited time period ending before the COVID pandemic. Fourth, the article arbitrarily discounts the appraised value of the non-traded REITs in its sample.","PeriodicalId":39998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wealth Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"102 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Traded REIT Performance: A Response to Mallett and McCann\",\"authors\":\"Thomas M. Selman\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jwm.2022.1.180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In their Winter 2021 article, “Further on the Returns to Non-Traded REITs,” Joshua Mallett and Craig McCann claimed to have found significantly lower performance for non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) as compared to the performance that investors would have earned in a portfolio of traded REITs. The authors’ analysis suffers from at least four fundamental errors. First, the article erroneously compares the performance of non-traded REITs to a mutual fund that is closed to new investors and that tracks an index of publicly traded REITs. Second, it inappropriately combines data about two types of non-traded REITs: “lifecycle REITs” and “NAV REITs.” Third, it uses a limited time period ending before the COVID pandemic. Fourth, the article arbitrarily discounts the appraised value of the non-traded REITs in its sample.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wealth Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2022.1.180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wealth Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2022.1.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他们2021年冬季的文章《关于非交易房地产投资信托基金的回报》中,Joshua Mallett和Craig McCann声称,与投资者在交易房地产投资信托基金投资组合中获得的业绩相比,非交易房地产投资信托基金(REITs)的业绩明显较低。作者的分析至少有四个基本错误。首先,这篇文章错误地将非交易REITs的表现与不对新投资者开放、追踪公开交易REITs指数的共同基金进行了比较。其次,它不恰当地结合了两种非交易型REITs的数据:“生命周期REITs”和“资产净值REITs”。第三,它使用了在COVID大流行之前结束的有限时间段。第四,本文对样本中非交易型REITs的评估价值进行了任意贴现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Traded REIT Performance: A Response to Mallett and McCann
In their Winter 2021 article, “Further on the Returns to Non-Traded REITs,” Joshua Mallett and Craig McCann claimed to have found significantly lower performance for non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) as compared to the performance that investors would have earned in a portfolio of traded REITs. The authors’ analysis suffers from at least four fundamental errors. First, the article erroneously compares the performance of non-traded REITs to a mutual fund that is closed to new investors and that tracks an index of publicly traded REITs. Second, it inappropriately combines data about two types of non-traded REITs: “lifecycle REITs” and “NAV REITs.” Third, it uses a limited time period ending before the COVID pandemic. Fourth, the article arbitrarily discounts the appraised value of the non-traded REITs in its sample.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wealth Management
Journal of Wealth Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The Safe-Haven and Hedging Properties of Agricultural Commodities Editor’s Letter Adding Art to Your Portfolio: A New Risk Assessment Framework Corporate Ownership of Fine Art: Firm Valuation, Societal Impacts, and Philanthropy Asset Allocation—Commodities or Commodity Stocks?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1