民粹主义者如何确保选举安全以赢得选举:2015年土耳其的双重选举

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES New Perspectives on Turkey Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.1017/npt.2020.34
O. Şahin
{"title":"民粹主义者如何确保选举安全以赢得选举:2015年土耳其的双重选举","authors":"O. Şahin","doi":"10.1017/npt.2020.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a new theoretical framework for understanding one of the ways in which populists generate support in elections. It argues that populist movements securitize elections by triggering perceptions of ontological insecurity among voters. Through this strategy, populist movements amplify voters’ negative image of the country they live in and the challenges they face, which contributes to populist movements’ electoral success. Building upon this theoretical framework, this study offers an explanation for the 2015 double general elections in Turkey. The Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) experienced disappointment after losing its parliamentary majority in the June 2015 elections. However, the AKP increased its votes by 8.6 percent in the November 2015 elections. Between these two elections, the AKP had used the Kurdish question to trigger perceptions of ontological insecurity, which enabled it to securitize the elections in November. This strategy helped the AKP win the November elections.","PeriodicalId":45032,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Turkey","volume":"64 1","pages":"7 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/npt.2020.34","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How populists securitize elections to win them: the 2015 double elections in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"O. Şahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/npt.2020.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents a new theoretical framework for understanding one of the ways in which populists generate support in elections. It argues that populist movements securitize elections by triggering perceptions of ontological insecurity among voters. Through this strategy, populist movements amplify voters’ negative image of the country they live in and the challenges they face, which contributes to populist movements’ electoral success. Building upon this theoretical framework, this study offers an explanation for the 2015 double general elections in Turkey. The Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) experienced disappointment after losing its parliamentary majority in the June 2015 elections. However, the AKP increased its votes by 8.6 percent in the November 2015 elections. Between these two elections, the AKP had used the Kurdish question to trigger perceptions of ontological insecurity, which enabled it to securitize the elections in November. This strategy helped the AKP win the November elections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Perspectives on Turkey\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/npt.2020.34\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Perspectives on Turkey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2020.34\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives on Turkey","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2020.34","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

这项研究为理解民粹主义者在选举中获得支持的方式之一提供了一个新的理论框架。它认为,民粹主义运动通过引发选民对本体论不安全感的感知,使选举安全化。通过这一策略,民粹主义运动放大了选民对他们生活的国家的负面形象和他们面临的挑战,这有助于民粹主义运动在选举中取得成功。基于这一理论框架,本研究为2015年土耳其双普选提供了解释。正义与发展党在2015年6月的选举中失去议会多数席位后,感到失望。然而,正义与发展党在2015年11月的选举中增加了8.6%的选票。在这两次选举之间,正义与发展党利用库尔德问题引发了本体论不安全感,这使其能够在11月的选举中实现安全。这一策略帮助正义与发展党赢得了11月的选举。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How populists securitize elections to win them: the 2015 double elections in Turkey
This study presents a new theoretical framework for understanding one of the ways in which populists generate support in elections. It argues that populist movements securitize elections by triggering perceptions of ontological insecurity among voters. Through this strategy, populist movements amplify voters’ negative image of the country they live in and the challenges they face, which contributes to populist movements’ electoral success. Building upon this theoretical framework, this study offers an explanation for the 2015 double general elections in Turkey. The Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) experienced disappointment after losing its parliamentary majority in the June 2015 elections. However, the AKP increased its votes by 8.6 percent in the November 2015 elections. Between these two elections, the AKP had used the Kurdish question to trigger perceptions of ontological insecurity, which enabled it to securitize the elections in November. This strategy helped the AKP win the November elections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives on Turkey
New Perspectives on Turkey SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Christians, Muslims, and Jews: Turkey and the management of refugees from Greece during World War II Migrants’ access to healthcare services: evidence from fieldwork in Turkey “This expulsion is explained in many ways”: Ottoman Greek Orthodox internal exiles during the Great War (1914–1918) NPT volume 69 Cover and Front matter NPT volume 69 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1