权利与拯救:一种奇怪的融合?

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165
S. Frisby
{"title":"权利与拯救:一种奇怪的融合?","authors":"S. Frisby","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers the recent proposals for the reform of corporate rehabilitation procedures. It examines the impetus for reform, the main features of the proposals and the underlying corporate insolvency landscape in the UK. The article attempts to determine whether the proposals are sufficiently robust in terms of balancing the interests of corporate creditors and the potential for corporate rescue, and how corporate creditors might respond if they consider that their rights are unduly or unfairly relegated. It also questions the utility of the proposed reforms for companies of all sizes, and whether there are omissions in terms of realising their objectives.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"39 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of rights and rescue: a curious confluence?\",\"authors\":\"S. Frisby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article considers the recent proposals for the reform of corporate rehabilitation procedures. It examines the impetus for reform, the main features of the proposals and the underlying corporate insolvency landscape in the UK. The article attempts to determine whether the proposals are sufficiently robust in terms of balancing the interests of corporate creditors and the potential for corporate rescue, and how corporate creditors might respond if they consider that their rights are unduly or unfairly relegated. It also questions the utility of the proposed reforms for companies of all sizes, and whether there are omissions in terms of realising their objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2019.1615165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文考虑了最近关于企业康复程序改革的建议。它考察了改革的动力、提案的主要特点以及英国潜在的企业破产状况。本文试图确定这些建议在平衡公司债权人的利益和公司救助的可能性方面是否足够有力,以及如果公司债权人认为他们的权利受到不适当或不公平的损害,他们可能会如何回应。报告还质疑拟议改革对各种规模企业的效用,以及在实现企业目标方面是否存在疏漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Of rights and rescue: a curious confluence?
ABSTRACT This article considers the recent proposals for the reform of corporate rehabilitation procedures. It examines the impetus for reform, the main features of the proposals and the underlying corporate insolvency landscape in the UK. The article attempts to determine whether the proposals are sufficiently robust in terms of balancing the interests of corporate creditors and the potential for corporate rescue, and how corporate creditors might respond if they consider that their rights are unduly or unfairly relegated. It also questions the utility of the proposed reforms for companies of all sizes, and whether there are omissions in terms of realising their objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1