基于市场的监管对企业碳披露和碳绩效的影响:全球证据

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1108/jaar-08-2022-0215
Md. Abu Shaikh Siddique, Khaled Aljifri, Shahadut Hossain, T. Choudhury
{"title":"基于市场的监管对企业碳披露和碳绩效的影响:全球证据","authors":"Md. Abu Shaikh Siddique, Khaled Aljifri, Shahadut Hossain, T. Choudhury","doi":"10.1108/jaar-08-2022-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn this study, the authors examine the relationships between market-based regulations and corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance. The authors also investigate whether these relationships vary across emission-intensive and non-emission intensive industries.Design/methodology/approachThe study sample consists of the world's 500 largest companies across most major industries over a recent five-year period. Country-specific random effect multiple regression analysis is used to test empirical models that predict relationships between market-based regulations and carbon disclosure and carbon performance.FindingsResults indicate that market-based regulations significantly and positively affect corporate carbon performance. However, market-based regulations do not significantly affect corporate carbon disclosure. This study also finds that the association between regulatory pressures and carbon disclosure and carbon performance varies across emission-intensive and non-emission-intensive industries.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study have key implications for policymakers, practitioners and future researchers in terms of understanding the factors that drive businesses to increase their carbon performance and disclosure. The study sample consists of only large firms, and future researchers can undertake similar studies with small and medium-sized firms.Practical implicationsThe results of this study are expected to help business managers to identify the benefits of adopting market-based regulations. Regulators can use this study’s results to evaluate if market-based regulations effectively improve corporate carbon performance and disclosure. Furthermore, stakeholders may use this study to evaluate and improve their businesses' reporting of carbon disclosure and performance.Originality/valueIn contrast to current literature that has used command and control regulations as a proxy for regulation, this study uses market-based regulations as a proxy for climate change regulations. In addition, this study uses a more comprehensive measure of carbon disclosure and carbon performance compared to the previous studies. It also uses global multi-sector data from carbon disclosure project (CDP) in contrast to most current studies that use national data from annual reports of sample firms of specific sectors.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of market-based regulations on corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance: global evidence\",\"authors\":\"Md. Abu Shaikh Siddique, Khaled Aljifri, Shahadut Hossain, T. Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jaar-08-2022-0215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn this study, the authors examine the relationships between market-based regulations and corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance. The authors also investigate whether these relationships vary across emission-intensive and non-emission intensive industries.Design/methodology/approachThe study sample consists of the world's 500 largest companies across most major industries over a recent five-year period. Country-specific random effect multiple regression analysis is used to test empirical models that predict relationships between market-based regulations and carbon disclosure and carbon performance.FindingsResults indicate that market-based regulations significantly and positively affect corporate carbon performance. However, market-based regulations do not significantly affect corporate carbon disclosure. This study also finds that the association between regulatory pressures and carbon disclosure and carbon performance varies across emission-intensive and non-emission-intensive industries.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study have key implications for policymakers, practitioners and future researchers in terms of understanding the factors that drive businesses to increase their carbon performance and disclosure. The study sample consists of only large firms, and future researchers can undertake similar studies with small and medium-sized firms.Practical implicationsThe results of this study are expected to help business managers to identify the benefits of adopting market-based regulations. Regulators can use this study’s results to evaluate if market-based regulations effectively improve corporate carbon performance and disclosure. Furthermore, stakeholders may use this study to evaluate and improve their businesses' reporting of carbon disclosure and performance.Originality/valueIn contrast to current literature that has used command and control regulations as a proxy for regulation, this study uses market-based regulations as a proxy for climate change regulations. In addition, this study uses a more comprehensive measure of carbon disclosure and carbon performance compared to the previous studies. It also uses global multi-sector data from carbon disclosure project (CDP) in contrast to most current studies that use national data from annual reports of sample firms of specific sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Accounting Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-08-2022-0215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-08-2022-0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在本研究中,作者考察了基于市场的监管与企业碳披露和碳绩效之间的关系。作者还调查了排放密集型和非排放密集型行业之间的这些关系是否不同。设计/方法论/方法研究样本由最近五年来世界上大多数主要行业的500家最大公司组成。具体国家的随机效应多元回归分析用于检验实证模型,这些模型预测了基于市场的监管与碳披露和碳绩效之间的关系。研究结果表明,基于市场的监管对企业碳绩效产生了显著而积极的影响。然而,基于市场的监管并不会对企业碳披露产生重大影响。这项研究还发现,监管压力与碳披露和碳绩效之间的关联在排放密集型和非排放密集型行业中各不相同。研究局限性/含义本研究的发现对政策制定者、从业者和未来的研究人员了解推动企业提高碳绩效和披露的因素具有重要意义。研究样本仅由大公司组成,未来的研究人员可以对中小型公司进行类似的研究。实际含义本研究的结果有望帮助企业管理者确定采用基于市场的法规的好处。监管机构可以利用这项研究的结果来评估基于市场的监管是否有效地改善了企业的碳绩效和披露。此外,利益相关者可以利用这项研究来评估和改进其企业对碳披露和绩效的报告。独创性/价值与目前使用指挥和控制法规作为监管代理的文献相反,本研究使用基于市场的法规作为气候变化法规的代理。此外,与之前的研究相比,本研究使用了更全面的碳披露和碳绩效衡量标准。它还使用了碳披露项目(CDP)的全球多部门数据,而目前的大多数研究都使用了特定部门样本公司年度报告中的国家数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of market-based regulations on corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance: global evidence
PurposeIn this study, the authors examine the relationships between market-based regulations and corporate carbon disclosure and carbon performance. The authors also investigate whether these relationships vary across emission-intensive and non-emission intensive industries.Design/methodology/approachThe study sample consists of the world's 500 largest companies across most major industries over a recent five-year period. Country-specific random effect multiple regression analysis is used to test empirical models that predict relationships between market-based regulations and carbon disclosure and carbon performance.FindingsResults indicate that market-based regulations significantly and positively affect corporate carbon performance. However, market-based regulations do not significantly affect corporate carbon disclosure. This study also finds that the association between regulatory pressures and carbon disclosure and carbon performance varies across emission-intensive and non-emission-intensive industries.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings of this study have key implications for policymakers, practitioners and future researchers in terms of understanding the factors that drive businesses to increase their carbon performance and disclosure. The study sample consists of only large firms, and future researchers can undertake similar studies with small and medium-sized firms.Practical implicationsThe results of this study are expected to help business managers to identify the benefits of adopting market-based regulations. Regulators can use this study’s results to evaluate if market-based regulations effectively improve corporate carbon performance and disclosure. Furthermore, stakeholders may use this study to evaluate and improve their businesses' reporting of carbon disclosure and performance.Originality/valueIn contrast to current literature that has used command and control regulations as a proxy for regulation, this study uses market-based regulations as a proxy for climate change regulations. In addition, this study uses a more comprehensive measure of carbon disclosure and carbon performance compared to the previous studies. It also uses global multi-sector data from carbon disclosure project (CDP) in contrast to most current studies that use national data from annual reports of sample firms of specific sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas assurance and carbon emission performance in light of the auditor’s reputation and the country’s development level A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1