计算机程序的双重性

I. Bondecka-Krzykowska
{"title":"计算机程序的双重性","authors":"I. Bondecka-Krzykowska","doi":"10.15633/ss.2483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is devoted to the discussion on ontological status of the computer programs. The most popular conceptions are presented and critically discussed: programs as concrete abstractions, as quasi-particular objects (similar to mu sical pieces), as mathematical objects (of different kinds), and finally – pro gram as digital pattern. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are pointed out and some possible solutions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":30875,"journal":{"name":"Semina Scientiarum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dualna natura programów komputerowych\",\"authors\":\"I. Bondecka-Krzykowska\",\"doi\":\"10.15633/ss.2483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper is devoted to the discussion on ontological status of the computer programs. The most popular conceptions are presented and critically discussed: programs as concrete abstractions, as quasi-particular objects (similar to mu sical pieces), as mathematical objects (of different kinds), and finally – pro gram as digital pattern. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are pointed out and some possible solutions are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semina Scientiarum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semina Scientiarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.2483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/ss.2483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对计算机程序的本体论地位进行了探讨。最流行的概念被提出并批判性地讨论:作为具体抽象的程序,作为准特定对象(类似于音乐片段),作为数学对象(不同种类),最后-程序作为数字模式。指出了这些方法的优缺点,并提出了一些可能的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dualna natura programów komputerowych
The paper is devoted to the discussion on ontological status of the computer programs. The most popular conceptions are presented and critically discussed: programs as concrete abstractions, as quasi-particular objects (similar to mu sical pieces), as mathematical objects (of different kinds), and finally – pro gram as digital pattern. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are pointed out and some possible solutions are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradygmat obiektowy w oprogramowaniu astronomicznym Człowiek jako wytwór siebie samego. Lem, transhumanizm i dwie koncepcje autentyczności Oświeceniowa wizja nauki w ujęciu Józefa Sołtykowicza, jako przykład refleksji filozoficznej z kręgu Towarzystwa Naukowego Krakowskiego Krytyka Platona przyjmowania uczestniczenia (ei;dh) rzeczy w postaciach () jako przyczynek do dyskusji na temat źródeł antynomii w podstawach matematyki Wyjątkowy status człowieka w przyrodzie? Nauki ewolucyjne a chrześcijańska antropologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1