道路规划和规划道路:缅甸掸邦南部纠缠的地理、时空框架和领土主张

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Burma Studies Pub Date : 2019-01-18 DOI:10.1353/JBS.2018.0014
C. Wittekind
{"title":"道路规划和规划道路:缅甸掸邦南部纠缠的地理、时空框架和领土主张","authors":"C. Wittekind","doi":"10.1353/JBS.2018.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, I investigate conflicting claims to land made in the peri-urban areas of Taunggyi, in Myanmar’s Shan state, where decades of ethnic insurgency, the negotiation of ceasefire agreements, and resultant military-state development strategies have figured land as a primary site and object of struggle. Yet, as I argue in this paper, it is not only land that is at stake in ongoing conflicts, but also the incongruous conceptions of space and time that motivate such claims. By exploring case studies linked to proposed road construction in Pa-O majority regions, I develop an approach to “land grabs”- and the counter claims-making they impel- that foregrounds the spatiotemporal, showing how distinct senses of time are activated, embodied, and re-animated through encounters with particular spaces. In this, I specifically argue that the linear, historical timeline embraced by state authorities-a timeline tied to sequential notions of advancement, modernization, and democratization - cannot be taken as fact; instead, it must be considered alongside alternate conceptualizations, through which the notion of a single narrative of “progress” might be opened up to contain alternative notions of past and present, and with them, new political possibilities.","PeriodicalId":53638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burma Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JBS.2018.0014","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Road Plans and Planned Roads: Entangled Geographies, Spatiotemporal Frames, and Territorial Claims-making in Myanmar’s Southern Shan State\",\"authors\":\"C. Wittekind\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/JBS.2018.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this article, I investigate conflicting claims to land made in the peri-urban areas of Taunggyi, in Myanmar’s Shan state, where decades of ethnic insurgency, the negotiation of ceasefire agreements, and resultant military-state development strategies have figured land as a primary site and object of struggle. Yet, as I argue in this paper, it is not only land that is at stake in ongoing conflicts, but also the incongruous conceptions of space and time that motivate such claims. By exploring case studies linked to proposed road construction in Pa-O majority regions, I develop an approach to “land grabs”- and the counter claims-making they impel- that foregrounds the spatiotemporal, showing how distinct senses of time are activated, embodied, and re-animated through encounters with particular spaces. In this, I specifically argue that the linear, historical timeline embraced by state authorities-a timeline tied to sequential notions of advancement, modernization, and democratization - cannot be taken as fact; instead, it must be considered alongside alternate conceptualizations, through which the notion of a single narrative of “progress” might be opened up to contain alternative notions of past and present, and with them, new political possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burma Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JBS.2018.0014\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burma Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/JBS.2018.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burma Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JBS.2018.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:在这篇文章中,我调查了在缅甸掸邦东吉城郊地区提出的相互矛盾的土地主张,在那里,几十年的民族叛乱、停火协议的谈判以及由此产生的军事国家发展战略将土地视为主要的斗争场所和对象。然而,正如我在本文中所说,在持续的冲突中,不仅土地受到威胁,而且空间和时间的不协调概念也激发了这种主张。通过探索与Pa-O占多数的地区拟议的道路建设相关的案例研究,我开发了一种“土地掠夺”的方法——以及促使土地掠夺的反诉——它突出了时空,展示了不同的时间感是如何通过与特定空间的相遇而被激活、体现和重新激活的。在这一点上,我特别指出,国家权威所信奉的线性历史时间线——与进步、现代化和民主化的顺序概念相联系的时间线——不能被视为事实;相反,它必须与其他概念一起考虑,通过这些概念,“进步”的单一叙事的概念可能会被打开,以包含过去和现在的其他概念,以及新的政治可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Road Plans and Planned Roads: Entangled Geographies, Spatiotemporal Frames, and Territorial Claims-making in Myanmar’s Southern Shan State
Abstract:In this article, I investigate conflicting claims to land made in the peri-urban areas of Taunggyi, in Myanmar’s Shan state, where decades of ethnic insurgency, the negotiation of ceasefire agreements, and resultant military-state development strategies have figured land as a primary site and object of struggle. Yet, as I argue in this paper, it is not only land that is at stake in ongoing conflicts, but also the incongruous conceptions of space and time that motivate such claims. By exploring case studies linked to proposed road construction in Pa-O majority regions, I develop an approach to “land grabs”- and the counter claims-making they impel- that foregrounds the spatiotemporal, showing how distinct senses of time are activated, embodied, and re-animated through encounters with particular spaces. In this, I specifically argue that the linear, historical timeline embraced by state authorities-a timeline tied to sequential notions of advancement, modernization, and democratization - cannot be taken as fact; instead, it must be considered alongside alternate conceptualizations, through which the notion of a single narrative of “progress” might be opened up to contain alternative notions of past and present, and with them, new political possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Burma Studies
Journal of Burma Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Politics of Banana Planting in Waingmaw Township Editor's Note Citizens and Land: Socioeconomic Effects of Relocation and Resettlement by the Thilawa Special Economic Zone Preparing the Coup in Myanmar: The Military's Strategy for Undermining the National League for Democracy Government Tolerant Tea Shops: The Social Construction of Forbearance in Child Labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1