Indranova Suhendro, Adrianto Shifa Al Aro, Muhammad Fikram Palembang, Ariqonitahanif Putri Rahim, Lusi Ratna Sari
{"title":"论印尼中爪哇Ungaran山镁基—中岩浆岩浆流和熔岩穹窿的形成","authors":"Indranova Suhendro, Adrianto Shifa Al Aro, Muhammad Fikram Palembang, Ariqonitahanif Putri Rahim, Lusi Ratna Sari","doi":"10.1134/S0742046323700148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we combined the results of petrography [pheno-crystallinity (<span>\\({{\\phi }_{{PC}}}\\)</span>)] and magma compositions (bulk and melt compositions) to calculate the magma viscosity (<span>\\({{{{\\mu }}}_{{{\\text{eff}}}}}\\)</span>) of the lava flows and domes that erupted from Mount Ungaran, Central Java, Indonesia. The lava flows were characterized by slightly larger SiO<sub>2</sub> variations than those of lava domes, with a large overlap between each phase (46.7–57.8 and 53.2–59.8 wt % SiO<sub>2</sub>, respectively). However, lava flows were typically less crystalline than the lava domes (average <span>\\({{\\phi }_{{PC}}}\\)</span> of 33 and 40%, respectively). Because lava flows share an identical composition to lava domes and temperature is inversely proportional to SiO<sub>2</sub> content, it is inferred that magma composition and temperature did not play a substantial role in controlling magma viscosity. Instead, we found that pheno-crystallinity was the most important parameter. Specially, for a ±7% difference of pheno-crystallinity (at a given SiO<sub>2</sub>), magma viscosity could differ by one order of magnitude, ultimately controlling lava morphology: high-viscosity magma (5.6–7.8 log Pa s) formed lava domes, whereas low-viscosity magma (4.6–6.6 log Pa s) produced lava flow. Moreover, we found that lava dome samples exhibited gentler phenocryst size distribution (CSD) slopes than lava flow samples (2.1–3.4 and 2.7–6.9, respectively). Because the CSD slope was inversely proportional to the magma residence time (CSD slope = –1/<i>Gt</i>), we suggest that lava dome formation, which requires a high magma viscosity, originates from a longer-lived and more crystalline magma, whereas lava flow with low magma viscosity originates from a young and less crystalline magma. Thus, in the case of mafic-to-intermediate magma, as in the present case, we think that the resultant lava morphology is strongly controlled by the abundance of phenocrysts and magma residence time.</p>","PeriodicalId":56112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","volume":"17 3","pages":"228 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Formation of Lava Flows and Lava Domes in Mafic-Intermediate Magmas (Mount Ungaran, Central Java, Indonesia)\",\"authors\":\"Indranova Suhendro, Adrianto Shifa Al Aro, Muhammad Fikram Palembang, Ariqonitahanif Putri Rahim, Lusi Ratna Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0742046323700148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we combined the results of petrography [pheno-crystallinity (<span>\\\\({{\\\\phi }_{{PC}}}\\\\)</span>)] and magma compositions (bulk and melt compositions) to calculate the magma viscosity (<span>\\\\({{{{\\\\mu }}}_{{{\\\\text{eff}}}}}\\\\)</span>) of the lava flows and domes that erupted from Mount Ungaran, Central Java, Indonesia. The lava flows were characterized by slightly larger SiO<sub>2</sub> variations than those of lava domes, with a large overlap between each phase (46.7–57.8 and 53.2–59.8 wt % SiO<sub>2</sub>, respectively). However, lava flows were typically less crystalline than the lava domes (average <span>\\\\({{\\\\phi }_{{PC}}}\\\\)</span> of 33 and 40%, respectively). Because lava flows share an identical composition to lava domes and temperature is inversely proportional to SiO<sub>2</sub> content, it is inferred that magma composition and temperature did not play a substantial role in controlling magma viscosity. Instead, we found that pheno-crystallinity was the most important parameter. Specially, for a ±7% difference of pheno-crystallinity (at a given SiO<sub>2</sub>), magma viscosity could differ by one order of magnitude, ultimately controlling lava morphology: high-viscosity magma (5.6–7.8 log Pa s) formed lava domes, whereas low-viscosity magma (4.6–6.6 log Pa s) produced lava flow. Moreover, we found that lava dome samples exhibited gentler phenocryst size distribution (CSD) slopes than lava flow samples (2.1–3.4 and 2.7–6.9, respectively). Because the CSD slope was inversely proportional to the magma residence time (CSD slope = –1/<i>Gt</i>), we suggest that lava dome formation, which requires a high magma viscosity, originates from a longer-lived and more crystalline magma, whereas lava flow with low magma viscosity originates from a young and less crystalline magma. Thus, in the case of mafic-to-intermediate magma, as in the present case, we think that the resultant lava morphology is strongly controlled by the abundance of phenocrysts and magma residence time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"228 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046323700148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0742046323700148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,我们将岩石学[物象结晶度(\({{\phi }_{{PC}}}\))]和岩浆成分(体积和熔体成分)的结果结合起来,计算了印度尼西亚中爪哇Ungaran火山喷发的熔岩流和圆顶的岩浆粘度(\({{{{\mu }}}_{{{\text{eff}}}}}\))。熔岩流的SiO2变化幅度略大于熔岩穹丘,且各相的重叠较大(46.7 ~ 57.8 wt和53.2 ~ 59.8 wt) % SiO2, respectively). However, lava flows were typically less crystalline than the lava domes (average \({{\phi }_{{PC}}}\) of 33 and 40%, respectively). Because lava flows share an identical composition to lava domes and temperature is inversely proportional to SiO2 content, it is inferred that magma composition and temperature did not play a substantial role in controlling magma viscosity. Instead, we found that pheno-crystallinity was the most important parameter. Specially, for a ±7% difference of pheno-crystallinity (at a given SiO2), magma viscosity could differ by one order of magnitude, ultimately controlling lava morphology: high-viscosity magma (5.6–7.8 log Pa s) formed lava domes, whereas low-viscosity magma (4.6–6.6 log Pa s) produced lava flow. Moreover, we found that lava dome samples exhibited gentler phenocryst size distribution (CSD) slopes than lava flow samples (2.1–3.4 and 2.7–6.9, respectively). Because the CSD slope was inversely proportional to the magma residence time (CSD slope = –1/Gt), we suggest that lava dome formation, which requires a high magma viscosity, originates from a longer-lived and more crystalline magma, whereas lava flow with low magma viscosity originates from a young and less crystalline magma. Thus, in the case of mafic-to-intermediate magma, as in the present case, we think that the resultant lava morphology is strongly controlled by the abundance of phenocrysts and magma residence time.
On the Formation of Lava Flows and Lava Domes in Mafic-Intermediate Magmas (Mount Ungaran, Central Java, Indonesia)
In this study, we combined the results of petrography [pheno-crystallinity (\({{\phi }_{{PC}}}\))] and magma compositions (bulk and melt compositions) to calculate the magma viscosity (\({{{{\mu }}}_{{{\text{eff}}}}}\)) of the lava flows and domes that erupted from Mount Ungaran, Central Java, Indonesia. The lava flows were characterized by slightly larger SiO2 variations than those of lava domes, with a large overlap between each phase (46.7–57.8 and 53.2–59.8 wt % SiO2, respectively). However, lava flows were typically less crystalline than the lava domes (average \({{\phi }_{{PC}}}\) of 33 and 40%, respectively). Because lava flows share an identical composition to lava domes and temperature is inversely proportional to SiO2 content, it is inferred that magma composition and temperature did not play a substantial role in controlling magma viscosity. Instead, we found that pheno-crystallinity was the most important parameter. Specially, for a ±7% difference of pheno-crystallinity (at a given SiO2), magma viscosity could differ by one order of magnitude, ultimately controlling lava morphology: high-viscosity magma (5.6–7.8 log Pa s) formed lava domes, whereas low-viscosity magma (4.6–6.6 log Pa s) produced lava flow. Moreover, we found that lava dome samples exhibited gentler phenocryst size distribution (CSD) slopes than lava flow samples (2.1–3.4 and 2.7–6.9, respectively). Because the CSD slope was inversely proportional to the magma residence time (CSD slope = –1/Gt), we suggest that lava dome formation, which requires a high magma viscosity, originates from a longer-lived and more crystalline magma, whereas lava flow with low magma viscosity originates from a young and less crystalline magma. Thus, in the case of mafic-to-intermediate magma, as in the present case, we think that the resultant lava morphology is strongly controlled by the abundance of phenocrysts and magma residence time.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Volcanology and Seismology publishes theoretical and experimental studies, communications, and reports on volcanic, seismic, geodynamic, and magmatic processes occurring in the areas of island arcs and other active regions of the Earth. In particular, the journal looks at present-day land and submarine volcanic activity; Neogene–Quaternary volcanism; mechanisms of plutonic activity; the geochemistry of volcanic and postvolcanic processes; geothermal systems in volcanic regions; and seismological monitoring. In addition, the journal surveys earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and techniques for predicting them.