健康学生社会运动技能与决策风格关系的探讨

Q3 Social Sciences IAFOR Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-10-22 DOI:10.22492/ije.9.5.03
Cândida G. Silva, Sara Gordo, Ana Cristina Rodrigues, C. Henriques, Marlene Rosa
{"title":"健康学生社会运动技能与决策风格关系的探讨","authors":"Cândida G. Silva, Sara Gordo, Ana Cristina Rodrigues, C. Henriques, Marlene Rosa","doi":"10.22492/ije.9.5.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education in health study programs is particularly focused on the development of technical skills, despite there being a consensus on the importance of training students regarding socioemotional and life skills. The aim of this study was to characterize and explore correlations between socioemotional skills and decision-making styles in undergraduate health students. Undergraduate students (18–25 years old) were recruited at a School of Health Sciences in Portugal. Participants were characterized in terms of sociodemographic data, socioemotional skills (Study on Social and Emotional Skills questionnaire) and decision-making styles (Melbourne Decision Making questionnaire). Descriptive statistics and correlations between questionnaires´ subscales were calculated. Students presented higher scores in tolerance (34.8±3.4), cooperation (34.7±2.4), empathy (31.1±3.2), vigilance (16.0±1.9), and procrastination (9.9±2.1). Assertiveness presented negative correlations with buck-passing (rho=-0.43, p<0.01) and procrastination (rho=-0.38, p<0.01) and positive correlation with vigilance (rho=0.22, p=0.03). Students demonstrated higher values in empathy, cooperation, and tolerance skills, meaning they tend to be kind and care for others’ well-being. Vigilance style is related to assertiveness characterizing hard working leaders able to pay attention to others’ needs. Training that involves socioemotional skills might be crucial for the style of decision-making in future health professionals.","PeriodicalId":52248,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Relationship between Socioemotional Skills and Decision-Making Styles in Health Students\",\"authors\":\"Cândida G. Silva, Sara Gordo, Ana Cristina Rodrigues, C. Henriques, Marlene Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.22492/ije.9.5.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher education in health study programs is particularly focused on the development of technical skills, despite there being a consensus on the importance of training students regarding socioemotional and life skills. The aim of this study was to characterize and explore correlations between socioemotional skills and decision-making styles in undergraduate health students. Undergraduate students (18–25 years old) were recruited at a School of Health Sciences in Portugal. Participants were characterized in terms of sociodemographic data, socioemotional skills (Study on Social and Emotional Skills questionnaire) and decision-making styles (Melbourne Decision Making questionnaire). Descriptive statistics and correlations between questionnaires´ subscales were calculated. Students presented higher scores in tolerance (34.8±3.4), cooperation (34.7±2.4), empathy (31.1±3.2), vigilance (16.0±1.9), and procrastination (9.9±2.1). Assertiveness presented negative correlations with buck-passing (rho=-0.43, p<0.01) and procrastination (rho=-0.38, p<0.01) and positive correlation with vigilance (rho=0.22, p=0.03). Students demonstrated higher values in empathy, cooperation, and tolerance skills, meaning they tend to be kind and care for others’ well-being. Vigilance style is related to assertiveness characterizing hard working leaders able to pay attention to others’ needs. Training that involves socioemotional skills might be crucial for the style of decision-making in future health professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAFOR Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAFOR Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.5.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.5.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

健康研究项目的高等教育特别注重技术技能的发展,尽管人们一致认为培训学生的社会情感和生活技能很重要。摘要本研究旨在探讨健康专业大学生的社会情绪技能与决策风格的关系。本科生(18-25岁)在葡萄牙的一所卫生科学学院招募。通过社会人口学数据、社会情感技能(社会与情感技能研究问卷)和决策风格(墨尔本决策问卷)对被试进行特征分析。计算描述性统计和问卷各分量表之间的相关性。学生在宽容(34.8±3.4)、合作(34.7±2.4)、共情(31.1±3.2)、警惕性(16.0±1.9)和拖延(9.9±2.1)方面得分较高。自信与推诿(rho=-0.43, p<0.01)、拖延(rho=-0.38, p<0.01)呈负相关,与警惕性呈正相关(rho=0.22, p=0.03)。学生在移情、合作和宽容技能方面表现出更高的价值,这意味着他们倾向于善良和关心他人的福祉。警惕性风格与自信有关,这是努力工作的领导者能够关注他人需求的特征。涉及社会情感技能的培训可能对未来卫生专业人员的决策风格至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Relationship between Socioemotional Skills and Decision-Making Styles in Health Students
Higher education in health study programs is particularly focused on the development of technical skills, despite there being a consensus on the importance of training students regarding socioemotional and life skills. The aim of this study was to characterize and explore correlations between socioemotional skills and decision-making styles in undergraduate health students. Undergraduate students (18–25 years old) were recruited at a School of Health Sciences in Portugal. Participants were characterized in terms of sociodemographic data, socioemotional skills (Study on Social and Emotional Skills questionnaire) and decision-making styles (Melbourne Decision Making questionnaire). Descriptive statistics and correlations between questionnaires´ subscales were calculated. Students presented higher scores in tolerance (34.8±3.4), cooperation (34.7±2.4), empathy (31.1±3.2), vigilance (16.0±1.9), and procrastination (9.9±2.1). Assertiveness presented negative correlations with buck-passing (rho=-0.43, p<0.01) and procrastination (rho=-0.38, p<0.01) and positive correlation with vigilance (rho=0.22, p=0.03). Students demonstrated higher values in empathy, cooperation, and tolerance skills, meaning they tend to be kind and care for others’ well-being. Vigilance style is related to assertiveness characterizing hard working leaders able to pay attention to others’ needs. Training that involves socioemotional skills might be crucial for the style of decision-making in future health professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IAFOR Journal of Education
IAFOR Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intercultural Communication: The Perceptions of Lebanese High School Directors Adoption of Innovative ELT Strategies by English Language Teachers in Rural Laos Examining Students’ Perspectives on Pedagogical Translanguaging in the Multilingual Classroom Context Enriching Students’ Cross-Cultural and Multilingual Communication: The Serious Play Approach Utilizing Playmobil Pro Figures Language Attrition and Cultural Identity Dynamics in International Schools in Azerbaijan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1