1950年代加拿大:政治和公共事务

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES American Review of Canadian Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/02722011.2023.2210412
Stephen G. Brooks
{"title":"1950年代加拿大:政治和公共事务","authors":"Stephen G. Brooks","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2210412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book, written by University of Toronto political scientist Nelson Wiseman, chronicles a decade in the life of Canada. Based largely on newspaper accounts from the Globe and Mail, Wiseman weaves a meticulous account of politics and of the social, cultural, and economic factors affecting public affairs during the 1950s. “My study focusses on the what rather than the why of the happenings of the 1950s” (3), he writes. It would be hard to imagine, however, that one of the foremost Canadian political scientists of his generation could repress the urge to address, or even want to avoid addressing the “why?” of the events and developments that he recounts. And, indeed, analysis and explanation are offered throughout the book, most particularly in a concluding chapter in which Wiseman offers reflections on the significance of the decade as “a chapter in Canadian history and part of a larger historical plot” (174). But why the 1950s? Wiseman recognizes that this is a question that will immediately be asked and that requires an answer. His explanation is one that makes rather modest claims about the decade. “We cannot say of the 1950s,” he writes, “as we can of the 1940s and the 1960s, that they represented a turning point in Canadian or world history” (3). In defense of his choice, Wiseman observes that “studying the decade does contribute to illuminating some of the fault lines and axes around which Canadian politics and public affairs have always revolved” (3). The same may be said, however, about any decade of the 20 century. I think that Wiseman’s claims about the significance of the 1950s in the larger sweep of Canadian political history are too modest. It is true that the decade has neither inspired nor acquired a label, such as the Great Depression of the 1930s or the Swinging Sixties. Indeed, the 1950s are generally thought of, in both Canada and the United States, as a rather soporific decade, bookended by much more tumultuous and consequential times. “In the procession of Canadian history,” Wiseman writes, “the 1950s may be considered as both a tranquil decade in which little changed or an era of transformation and adaptation” (4, my emphasis). Readers of this book will find that the latter is the appropriate characterization. As I made my way through the year-by-year biography of this decade, I found myself thinking about Earle Birney’s 1948 poem, “Canada: Case History.” Birney portrays the country as,","PeriodicalId":43336,"journal":{"name":"American Review of Canadian Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"293 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1950s Canada: Politics and Public Affairs\",\"authors\":\"Stephen G. Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02722011.2023.2210412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book, written by University of Toronto political scientist Nelson Wiseman, chronicles a decade in the life of Canada. Based largely on newspaper accounts from the Globe and Mail, Wiseman weaves a meticulous account of politics and of the social, cultural, and economic factors affecting public affairs during the 1950s. “My study focusses on the what rather than the why of the happenings of the 1950s” (3), he writes. It would be hard to imagine, however, that one of the foremost Canadian political scientists of his generation could repress the urge to address, or even want to avoid addressing the “why?” of the events and developments that he recounts. And, indeed, analysis and explanation are offered throughout the book, most particularly in a concluding chapter in which Wiseman offers reflections on the significance of the decade as “a chapter in Canadian history and part of a larger historical plot” (174). But why the 1950s? Wiseman recognizes that this is a question that will immediately be asked and that requires an answer. His explanation is one that makes rather modest claims about the decade. “We cannot say of the 1950s,” he writes, “as we can of the 1940s and the 1960s, that they represented a turning point in Canadian or world history” (3). In defense of his choice, Wiseman observes that “studying the decade does contribute to illuminating some of the fault lines and axes around which Canadian politics and public affairs have always revolved” (3). The same may be said, however, about any decade of the 20 century. I think that Wiseman’s claims about the significance of the 1950s in the larger sweep of Canadian political history are too modest. It is true that the decade has neither inspired nor acquired a label, such as the Great Depression of the 1930s or the Swinging Sixties. Indeed, the 1950s are generally thought of, in both Canada and the United States, as a rather soporific decade, bookended by much more tumultuous and consequential times. “In the procession of Canadian history,” Wiseman writes, “the 1950s may be considered as both a tranquil decade in which little changed or an era of transformation and adaptation” (4, my emphasis). Readers of this book will find that the latter is the appropriate characterization. As I made my way through the year-by-year biography of this decade, I found myself thinking about Earle Birney’s 1948 poem, “Canada: Case History.” Birney portrays the country as,\",\"PeriodicalId\":43336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Review of Canadian Studies\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"293 - 294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Review of Canadian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2023.2210412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Review of Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2023.2210412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书由多伦多大学政治学家尼尔森·怀斯曼撰写,记录了加拿大十年的生活。怀斯曼主要以《环球邮报》的报纸报道为基础,对20世纪50年代影响公共事务的政治、社会、文化和经济因素进行了细致的描述。他写道:“我的研究重点是20世纪50年代发生了什么,而不是为什么发生。”然而,很难想象,作为他那一代最重要的加拿大政治学家之一,他会抑制自己想要解决的冲动,甚至想要避免解决“为什么?”他所叙述的事件和发展。事实上,分析和解释贯穿全书,尤其是在最后一章,怀斯曼反思了这十年作为“加拿大历史上的一章和更大历史情节的一部分”的重要性(174)。但为什么是20世纪50年代?怀斯曼认识到,这是一个马上就会被问到的问题,需要一个答案。他对这十年的解释相当谦虚。他写道:“我们不能像说40年代和60年代那样说50年代是加拿大或世界历史的转折点”(3)。为了为自己的选择辩护,怀斯曼指出,“研究这十年确实有助于阐明加拿大政治和公共事务一直围绕着的一些断层线和轴线”(3)。然而,对于20世纪的任何一个十年,我们也可以说同样的话。我认为怀斯曼关于20世纪50年代在加拿大政治史上的重要性的说法过于谦虚。的确,这十年既没有像上世纪30年代的大萧条(Great Depression)或摇摆的60年代(Swinging sixty)那样受到启发,也没有获得一个标签。的确,在加拿大和美国,人们普遍认为20世纪50年代是一个相当令人昏昏欲睡的十年,其后是更加动荡和重要的时期。怀斯曼写道:“在加拿大的历史进程中,20世纪50年代可以被认为是一个平静的十年,几乎没有什么变化,或者是一个转型和适应的时代。”这本书的读者会发现后者是合适的描述。当我翻阅这十年的逐年传记时,我发现自己想起了厄尔·伯尼(Earle Birney) 1948年的诗《加拿大:个案历史》(Canada: Case History)。伯尼把这个国家描绘成,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950s Canada: Politics and Public Affairs
This book, written by University of Toronto political scientist Nelson Wiseman, chronicles a decade in the life of Canada. Based largely on newspaper accounts from the Globe and Mail, Wiseman weaves a meticulous account of politics and of the social, cultural, and economic factors affecting public affairs during the 1950s. “My study focusses on the what rather than the why of the happenings of the 1950s” (3), he writes. It would be hard to imagine, however, that one of the foremost Canadian political scientists of his generation could repress the urge to address, or even want to avoid addressing the “why?” of the events and developments that he recounts. And, indeed, analysis and explanation are offered throughout the book, most particularly in a concluding chapter in which Wiseman offers reflections on the significance of the decade as “a chapter in Canadian history and part of a larger historical plot” (174). But why the 1950s? Wiseman recognizes that this is a question that will immediately be asked and that requires an answer. His explanation is one that makes rather modest claims about the decade. “We cannot say of the 1950s,” he writes, “as we can of the 1940s and the 1960s, that they represented a turning point in Canadian or world history” (3). In defense of his choice, Wiseman observes that “studying the decade does contribute to illuminating some of the fault lines and axes around which Canadian politics and public affairs have always revolved” (3). The same may be said, however, about any decade of the 20 century. I think that Wiseman’s claims about the significance of the 1950s in the larger sweep of Canadian political history are too modest. It is true that the decade has neither inspired nor acquired a label, such as the Great Depression of the 1930s or the Swinging Sixties. Indeed, the 1950s are generally thought of, in both Canada and the United States, as a rather soporific decade, bookended by much more tumultuous and consequential times. “In the procession of Canadian history,” Wiseman writes, “the 1950s may be considered as both a tranquil decade in which little changed or an era of transformation and adaptation” (4, my emphasis). Readers of this book will find that the latter is the appropriate characterization. As I made my way through the year-by-year biography of this decade, I found myself thinking about Earle Birney’s 1948 poem, “Canada: Case History.” Birney portrays the country as,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: American Nineteenth Century History is a peer-reviewed, transatlantic journal devoted to the history of the United States during the long nineteenth century. It welcomes contributions on themes and topics relating to America in this period: slavery, race and ethnicity, the Civil War and Reconstruction, military history, American nationalism, urban history, immigration and ethnicity, western history, the history of women, gender studies, African Americans and Native Americans, cultural studies and comparative pieces. In addition to articles based on original research, historiographical pieces, reassessments of historical controversies, and reappraisals of prominent events or individuals are welcome. Special issues devoted to a particular theme or topic will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
The Gender Gap and Academic Publishing in Political Science: Evidence from Canada Debating the Voting Age: How Canadian Legislators Grapple with the Federal Voting Age NORAD: In Perpetuity and Beyond Managing Federalism Through Pandemic The Right to Be Rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1