战略重点与企业绩效的报告和沟通转变

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Research in Marketing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.08.006
Sonja Gensler , Karlo Oehring , Thorsten Wiesel
{"title":"战略重点与企业绩效的报告和沟通转变","authors":"Sonja Gensler ,&nbsp;Karlo Oehring ,&nbsp;Thorsten Wiesel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In light of scarce resources, firms strategically weigh off between investments in value creation and value appropriation. They do so by placing more emphasis on one of the two strategic orientations which defines their strategic emphasis. So far, literature has relied on accounting data – specifically on reported investments in R&amp;D and advertising – to operationalize <em>reported strategic emphasis</em> and studied its association with a firm’s financial performance. Previous studies suggest that firms benefit from emphasizing value appropriation. However, we show that the association between shifts in reported strategic emphasis and stock returns has actually changed over time. These days, the stock market wants firms to balance their strategic orientation. Moreover, this study not only takes a firm’s reported strategic emphasis into account but also considers what firms communicate about their strategic orientation. The study infers <em>communicated strategic emphasis</em> from a firm’s ‘Management Discussion &amp; Analysis’ (MD&amp;A) section of its Form 10-K filings. The authors develop a special purpose dictionary and show that what firms say about their strategic emphasis matters to investors in addition to what they report. The authors further discuss differences in the relevance of shifts in strategic emphasis across industries. Especially, the distinction between reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis provides novel managerial insights and avenues for future marketing strategy research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 220-240"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis and firm performance\",\"authors\":\"Sonja Gensler ,&nbsp;Karlo Oehring ,&nbsp;Thorsten Wiesel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In light of scarce resources, firms strategically weigh off between investments in value creation and value appropriation. They do so by placing more emphasis on one of the two strategic orientations which defines their strategic emphasis. So far, literature has relied on accounting data – specifically on reported investments in R&amp;D and advertising – to operationalize <em>reported strategic emphasis</em> and studied its association with a firm’s financial performance. Previous studies suggest that firms benefit from emphasizing value appropriation. However, we show that the association between shifts in reported strategic emphasis and stock returns has actually changed over time. These days, the stock market wants firms to balance their strategic orientation. Moreover, this study not only takes a firm’s reported strategic emphasis into account but also considers what firms communicate about their strategic orientation. The study infers <em>communicated strategic emphasis</em> from a firm’s ‘Management Discussion &amp; Analysis’ (MD&amp;A) section of its Form 10-K filings. The authors develop a special purpose dictionary and show that what firms say about their strategic emphasis matters to investors in addition to what they report. The authors further discuss differences in the relevance of shifts in strategic emphasis across industries. Especially, the distinction between reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis provides novel managerial insights and avenues for future marketing strategy research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 220-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811623000526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811623000526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在资源稀缺的情况下,企业会在价值创造投资和价值占有投资之间进行战略权衡。为此,企业会更加重视这两种战略取向中的一种,从而确定自己的战略重点。迄今为止,文献主要依靠会计数据--特别是报告的研发和广告投资--来操作报告的战略重点,并研究其与公司财务业绩的关系。以往的研究表明,企业从强调价值分配中获益。然而,我们的研究表明,随着时间的推移,报告战略重点的变化与股票回报之间的关系实际上已经发生了变化。如今,股票市场希望公司平衡其战略导向。此外,本研究不仅考虑了公司报告的战略重点,还考虑了公司对其战略导向的宣传。本研究从公司提交的 10-K 表中的 "管理层讨论与分析"(MD&A)部分推断出公司传达的战略重点。作者编写了一本特殊用途词典,并表明除了公司报告的内容外,公司对其战略重点的表述对投资者也很重要。作者进一步讨论了不同行业战略重点转变的相关性差异。特别是,报告的战略重点转移与传达的战略重点转移之间的区别为未来的营销战略研究提供了新颖的管理见解和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis and firm performance

In light of scarce resources, firms strategically weigh off between investments in value creation and value appropriation. They do so by placing more emphasis on one of the two strategic orientations which defines their strategic emphasis. So far, literature has relied on accounting data – specifically on reported investments in R&D and advertising – to operationalize reported strategic emphasis and studied its association with a firm’s financial performance. Previous studies suggest that firms benefit from emphasizing value appropriation. However, we show that the association between shifts in reported strategic emphasis and stock returns has actually changed over time. These days, the stock market wants firms to balance their strategic orientation. Moreover, this study not only takes a firm’s reported strategic emphasis into account but also considers what firms communicate about their strategic orientation. The study infers communicated strategic emphasis from a firm’s ‘Management Discussion & Analysis’ (MD&A) section of its Form 10-K filings. The authors develop a special purpose dictionary and show that what firms say about their strategic emphasis matters to investors in addition to what they report. The authors further discuss differences in the relevance of shifts in strategic emphasis across industries. Especially, the distinction between reported and communicated shifts in strategic emphasis provides novel managerial insights and avenues for future marketing strategy research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels Editorial Board Strange Case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer Preference Inconsistencies in Costly Price Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1