上演地质档案:《没有我们的世界》和《人类世剧场》

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795
Mahlu Mertens
{"title":"上演地质档案:《没有我们的世界》和《人类世剧场》","authors":"Mahlu Mertens","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With regard to art and the Anthropocene, literary critics have extensively discussed fiction, but theater, in its evanescence, offers a unique opportunity to think through the pressures and challenges of the Anthropocene as well. Very little attention has been paid to the strategies used within contemporary theater to tackle the challenges the Anthropocene poses to the human imagination, even though, or perhaps exactly because, theater seems to face an even bigger challenge than fiction. Unlike printed forms, performance is not only dependent on human language, but also on human bodies that act out, or at least convey, the story, and these performances are themselves fleeting and difficult – indeed, impossible – to preserve for posterity. The few articles that have been published on theater and the Anthropocene focus on climate change plays that have been staged (Johns-Putra), or they overlook the formal challenges inherent in depicting the Anthropocene on stage. In this essay, I use the term “Anthropocene” in the formal geological sense of the word as defined by the Working Group on the Anthropocene (n.p.). Their definition is based on the stratigraphic signals which indicate that the Anthropocene is, will be, and will have been a distinct stratigraphic unit whose distinctiveness derives precisely from its being anthropogenic in nature. The concept of the Anthropocene, literary scholar Jeremy Davies argues, “requires a certain indirectness [because] one must imaginatively transfer oneself to the far future” to see “how readily discernible [environmental change] will be millions of years from now” (66–67). World Without Us (2016), a Flemish theater play by Ontroerend Goed, tries to do just that: it imagines the long-lasting impact of the human presence on the planet. The play World Without Us is loosely based on Alan Weisman‘s speculative nonfiction work TheWorldWithout Us (2007), in which he describes what would happen to the natural and built environment if human life were to be wiped out. The play toured from 2016 to 2018 in Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. World Without Us explicitly takes the present, the here and now of the theater space where the actor and audience are gathered together, as a starting point for a proleptic remembering of the geological archive. It is a monologue for one actor, who functions as narrator, describing in a factual","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"31 1","pages":"60 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staging the Geological Archive: Ontroerend Goed’s World Without Us and Anthropocene Theater\",\"authors\":\"Mahlu Mertens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With regard to art and the Anthropocene, literary critics have extensively discussed fiction, but theater, in its evanescence, offers a unique opportunity to think through the pressures and challenges of the Anthropocene as well. Very little attention has been paid to the strategies used within contemporary theater to tackle the challenges the Anthropocene poses to the human imagination, even though, or perhaps exactly because, theater seems to face an even bigger challenge than fiction. Unlike printed forms, performance is not only dependent on human language, but also on human bodies that act out, or at least convey, the story, and these performances are themselves fleeting and difficult – indeed, impossible – to preserve for posterity. The few articles that have been published on theater and the Anthropocene focus on climate change plays that have been staged (Johns-Putra), or they overlook the formal challenges inherent in depicting the Anthropocene on stage. In this essay, I use the term “Anthropocene” in the formal geological sense of the word as defined by the Working Group on the Anthropocene (n.p.). Their definition is based on the stratigraphic signals which indicate that the Anthropocene is, will be, and will have been a distinct stratigraphic unit whose distinctiveness derives precisely from its being anthropogenic in nature. The concept of the Anthropocene, literary scholar Jeremy Davies argues, “requires a certain indirectness [because] one must imaginatively transfer oneself to the far future” to see “how readily discernible [environmental change] will be millions of years from now” (66–67). World Without Us (2016), a Flemish theater play by Ontroerend Goed, tries to do just that: it imagines the long-lasting impact of the human presence on the planet. The play World Without Us is loosely based on Alan Weisman‘s speculative nonfiction work TheWorldWithout Us (2007), in which he describes what would happen to the natural and built environment if human life were to be wiped out. The play toured from 2016 to 2018 in Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. World Without Us explicitly takes the present, the here and now of the theater space where the actor and audience are gathered together, as a starting point for a proleptic remembering of the geological archive. It is a monologue for one actor, who functions as narrator, describing in a factual\",\"PeriodicalId\":42717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2020.1712795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于艺术和人类世,文学评论家们广泛讨论了小说,但戏剧在其衰落期,也提供了一个独特的机会来思考人类世的压力和挑战。当代戏剧中用于应对人类世对人类想象力构成的挑战的策略很少受到关注,尽管,也许正是因为,戏剧似乎面临着比小说更大的挑战。与印刷形式不同,表演不仅取决于人类语言,还取决于表现或至少传达故事的人体,而这些表演本身就是转瞬即逝的,很难——事实上,不可能——为子孙后代保存。发表在戏剧和人类世上的为数不多的文章关注的是已经上演的气候变化戏剧(Johns Putra),或者它们忽视了在舞台上描绘人类世所固有的形式挑战。在这篇文章中,我使用了人类世工作组(n.p.)定义的正式地质学意义上的“人类世”一词。他们的定义是基于地层信号,这些信号表明人类世现在、将来和将来都是一个独特的地层单元,其独特性正是源于它在本质上是人为的。文学学者Jeremy Davies认为,人类世的概念“需要一定的间接性[因为]一个人必须富有想象力地将自己转移到遥远的未来”,才能看到“数百万年后[环境变化]将是多么容易察觉”(66–67)。Ontroerend Goed的佛兰德戏剧《没有我们的世界》(2016)试图做到这一点:它想象了人类存在对地球的长期影响。戏剧《没有我们的世界》大致基于艾伦·韦斯曼的推测性非虚构作品《没有我们》(2007),他在作品中描述了如果人类生命被消灭,自然和建筑环境会发生什么。该剧于2016年至2018年在比利时、荷兰、澳大利亚、英国和其他地方巡回演出。《没有我们的世界》明确地将演员和观众聚集在一起的剧院空间的现在、此时此地作为对地质档案进行怀疑性记忆的起点。这是一个扮演叙述者的演员的独白,用事实来描述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Staging the Geological Archive: Ontroerend Goed’s World Without Us and Anthropocene Theater
With regard to art and the Anthropocene, literary critics have extensively discussed fiction, but theater, in its evanescence, offers a unique opportunity to think through the pressures and challenges of the Anthropocene as well. Very little attention has been paid to the strategies used within contemporary theater to tackle the challenges the Anthropocene poses to the human imagination, even though, or perhaps exactly because, theater seems to face an even bigger challenge than fiction. Unlike printed forms, performance is not only dependent on human language, but also on human bodies that act out, or at least convey, the story, and these performances are themselves fleeting and difficult – indeed, impossible – to preserve for posterity. The few articles that have been published on theater and the Anthropocene focus on climate change plays that have been staged (Johns-Putra), or they overlook the formal challenges inherent in depicting the Anthropocene on stage. In this essay, I use the term “Anthropocene” in the formal geological sense of the word as defined by the Working Group on the Anthropocene (n.p.). Their definition is based on the stratigraphic signals which indicate that the Anthropocene is, will be, and will have been a distinct stratigraphic unit whose distinctiveness derives precisely from its being anthropogenic in nature. The concept of the Anthropocene, literary scholar Jeremy Davies argues, “requires a certain indirectness [because] one must imaginatively transfer oneself to the far future” to see “how readily discernible [environmental change] will be millions of years from now” (66–67). World Without Us (2016), a Flemish theater play by Ontroerend Goed, tries to do just that: it imagines the long-lasting impact of the human presence on the planet. The play World Without Us is loosely based on Alan Weisman‘s speculative nonfiction work TheWorldWithout Us (2007), in which he describes what would happen to the natural and built environment if human life were to be wiped out. The play toured from 2016 to 2018 in Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. World Without Us explicitly takes the present, the here and now of the theater space where the actor and audience are gathered together, as a starting point for a proleptic remembering of the geological archive. It is a monologue for one actor, who functions as narrator, describing in a factual
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Alex as the Product, Producer, and Consumer of Art in the Dilapidated State, in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Friendship and Art in Valerie Martin’s I Give It to You Reading As Conversation with the Overarching Blended Author (Or Roberto Bolaño): Joint Attention, Immersion, and Interaction The Objects of Jane Gardam The Book, Meaning, and Densities of Essential Forms in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1