历史束缚着我们,也能打破我们——曼尼普尔奇武石刻之争

IF 0.9 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Asian Ethnicity Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.1080/14631369.2022.2051111
L. Piang
{"title":"历史束缚着我们,也能打破我们——曼尼普尔奇武石刻之争","authors":"L. Piang","doi":"10.1080/14631369.2022.2051111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Monuments with inscriptions have always been an important source of history and are helpful for reconstructing the past. They recreate collective memories, as they were erected to commemorate significant events from the past. The historical process of state formation, especially among the former colonies, has bound different ethnic communities, which obliges them to initiate state nation-building processes. So, memories which are recreated, remembered, and forgotten have played a crucial role in shaping ethnic relations as well as relations between the state and various ethnic communities in a multi-ethnic state. This paper analyses the allegation about the Manipur’s Chibu stone inscription as a fabricated historical event, and the complaint asking that its status as a protected archaeological site be denied. It argues that in the name of the state nation-building project, the state has resorted to recreating collective memories with little consideration to the sentiment of ethnic minorities in a state.","PeriodicalId":45296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Ethnicity","volume":"23 1","pages":"641 - 657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History Binds Us, Can Break Us Too: Contention over Manipur’s Chivu Stone Inscription\",\"authors\":\"L. Piang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14631369.2022.2051111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Monuments with inscriptions have always been an important source of history and are helpful for reconstructing the past. They recreate collective memories, as they were erected to commemorate significant events from the past. The historical process of state formation, especially among the former colonies, has bound different ethnic communities, which obliges them to initiate state nation-building processes. So, memories which are recreated, remembered, and forgotten have played a crucial role in shaping ethnic relations as well as relations between the state and various ethnic communities in a multi-ethnic state. This paper analyses the allegation about the Manipur’s Chibu stone inscription as a fabricated historical event, and the complaint asking that its status as a protected archaeological site be denied. It argues that in the name of the state nation-building project, the state has resorted to recreating collective memories with little consideration to the sentiment of ethnic minorities in a state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Ethnicity\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"641 - 657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Ethnicity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2022.2051111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Ethnicity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2022.2051111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要碑文古迹一直是历史的重要来源,有助于重建过去。它们重建了集体记忆,因为它们是为了纪念过去的重大事件而竖立的。国家形成的历史过程,特别是在前殖民地之间,将不同的种族社区联系在一起,这迫使他们启动国家建设进程。因此,被重新创造、记忆和遗忘的记忆在塑造民族关系以及国家与多民族国家中各个民族社区之间的关系方面发挥了至关重要的作用。本文分析了关于曼尼普尔奇布石刻是捏造的历史事件的指控,以及要求否认其考古保护遗址地位的投诉。它认为,以国家国家建设项目的名义,国家诉诸于重建集体记忆,而很少考虑到一个国家少数民族的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
History Binds Us, Can Break Us Too: Contention over Manipur’s Chivu Stone Inscription
ABSTRACT Monuments with inscriptions have always been an important source of history and are helpful for reconstructing the past. They recreate collective memories, as they were erected to commemorate significant events from the past. The historical process of state formation, especially among the former colonies, has bound different ethnic communities, which obliges them to initiate state nation-building processes. So, memories which are recreated, remembered, and forgotten have played a crucial role in shaping ethnic relations as well as relations between the state and various ethnic communities in a multi-ethnic state. This paper analyses the allegation about the Manipur’s Chibu stone inscription as a fabricated historical event, and the complaint asking that its status as a protected archaeological site be denied. It argues that in the name of the state nation-building project, the state has resorted to recreating collective memories with little consideration to the sentiment of ethnic minorities in a state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Ethnicity
Asian Ethnicity PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: In the twenty-first century ethnic issues have assumed importance in many parts of the world. Until recently, questions of Asian ethnicity and identity have been treated in a balkanized fashion, with anthropologists, economists, historians, political scientists, sociologists and others publishing their studies in single-discipline journals. Asian Ethnicity provides a cross-disciplinary, international venue for the publication of well-researched articles about ethnic groups and ethnic relations in the half of the world where questions of ethnicity now loom largest. Asian Ethnicity covers any time period, although the greatest focus is expected to be on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Pan-Asianism: connecting China and India, 1840s–1960s Beyond Pan-Asianism: connecting China and India, 1840s–1960s . Edited by Tansen Sen and Brian Tsui, New Delhi, India, Oxford University Press, 2021, vii, 494 pp., ₹1459 (hardcover), ISBN 9780190129118. Beyond common consciousness: understanding the rise of separate identity consciousness among indigenous Muslims of Assam Minorities rights, and the law in Malaysia Minorities rights, and the law in Malaysia , by Thaatchaayini Kananatu, London and New York, Routledge, 2022, 224 pp., € 38.99, (Paperback), ISBN: 9781032400488 Geographies of otherness: films and interstate migrants of Kerala An ethnographic expose of Mithun-human interrelationship among the Kuki community of Northeast India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1