印度疱疹学70年:对重点研究领域和作者性别比例变化的见解

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Amphibia-Reptilia Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI:10.1163/15685381-bja10088
V. P. Cyriac, Sneha Dharwardkar, A. Mital, A. Mohan
{"title":"印度疱疹学70年:对重点研究领域和作者性别比例变化的见解","authors":"V. P. Cyriac, Sneha Dharwardkar, A. Mital, A. Mohan","doi":"10.1163/15685381-bja10088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Herpetology in India took off during the British colonial rule with the documentation of herpetofauna. Several studies have outlined the early history of Indian herpetology; however, few have traced the growth of this field since India’s independence. We analyse trends in Indian herpetology focusing on taxa, subfields, and authorship over the last 70 years. Of the 1177 published articles we analysed, 64.9% studied reptiles, 26.5% studied amphibians and 8.6% were general herpetofaunal studies. Frogs, lizards, and snakes being the most diverse herpetofauna groups, each accounted for 20-21% of the published articles and significantly outnumber publications on caecilians (2.3%), salamanders (0.4%), chelonians (12.6%), and crocodiles (4.4%). We found a significantly greater number of publications on Diversity & Distribution (34.2%), Taxonomy & Systematics (21.6%) and Ecology (19.4%) compared to other subfields, and detected a decline in Development, Physiology & Cytology and Evolutionary biology studies over the last four decades (1980-2019). The gender ratio among co-authors was dominated by men with only 29.7% of publications containing women authors. The overall proportion of women authors has not changed significantly over decades, but our analyses detected a significant decrease in women first authors and the proportion of women authors when the corresponding authors were men. Women authors were substantially lower in the subfield of Taxonomy & Systematics, and women published significantly more on amphibians compared to reptiles. Overall, we highlight the growth of herpetology in India from two key viewpoints, scientific pursuits, and gender parity among herpetologists.","PeriodicalId":50799,"journal":{"name":"Amphibia-Reptilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"70 years of herpetology in India: insights into shifts in focal research areas and gender ratios among authors\",\"authors\":\"V. P. Cyriac, Sneha Dharwardkar, A. Mital, A. Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685381-bja10088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Herpetology in India took off during the British colonial rule with the documentation of herpetofauna. Several studies have outlined the early history of Indian herpetology; however, few have traced the growth of this field since India’s independence. We analyse trends in Indian herpetology focusing on taxa, subfields, and authorship over the last 70 years. Of the 1177 published articles we analysed, 64.9% studied reptiles, 26.5% studied amphibians and 8.6% were general herpetofaunal studies. Frogs, lizards, and snakes being the most diverse herpetofauna groups, each accounted for 20-21% of the published articles and significantly outnumber publications on caecilians (2.3%), salamanders (0.4%), chelonians (12.6%), and crocodiles (4.4%). We found a significantly greater number of publications on Diversity & Distribution (34.2%), Taxonomy & Systematics (21.6%) and Ecology (19.4%) compared to other subfields, and detected a decline in Development, Physiology & Cytology and Evolutionary biology studies over the last four decades (1980-2019). The gender ratio among co-authors was dominated by men with only 29.7% of publications containing women authors. The overall proportion of women authors has not changed significantly over decades, but our analyses detected a significant decrease in women first authors and the proportion of women authors when the corresponding authors were men. Women authors were substantially lower in the subfield of Taxonomy & Systematics, and women published significantly more on amphibians compared to reptiles. Overall, we highlight the growth of herpetology in India from two key viewpoints, scientific pursuits, and gender parity among herpetologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amphibia-Reptilia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amphibia-Reptilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amphibia-Reptilia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在英国殖民统治期间,印度的爬虫学随着疱疹动物的文献而兴起。几项研究概述了印度爬虫学的早期历史;然而,自印度独立以来,很少有人追踪到这一领域的发展。我们分析了过去70年来印度爬虫学的趋势,重点是分类群、子领域和作者。在我们分析的1177篇已发表的文章中,64.9%研究了爬行动物,26.5%研究了两栖动物,8.6%研究了一般疱疹动物。青蛙、蜥蜴和蛇是最具多样性的爬虫类动物群,它们各自占已发表文章的20-21%,远远超过了关于盲肠动物(2.3%)、蝾螈(0.4%)、螯螈(12.6%)和鳄鱼(4.4%)的出版物。我们发现,关于多样性和分布的出版物数量明显更多(34.2%),与其他子领域相比,分类学和系统学(21.6%)和生态学(19.4%),并发现在过去四十年(1980-2019)中,发育、生理学和细胞学以及进化生物学研究有所下降。合著者中的性别比例以男性为主,只有29.7%的出版物中有女性作者。几十年来,女性作者的总体比例没有显著变化,但我们的分析发现,当通讯作者为男性时,女性第一作者和女性作者的比例显著下降。女性作者在分类学和系统学子领域的比例要低得多,与爬行动物相比,女性发表的关于两栖动物的文章要多得多。总的来说,我们从两个关键的角度强调了印度爬虫学的发展,即科学追求和爬虫学家之间的性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
70 years of herpetology in India: insights into shifts in focal research areas and gender ratios among authors
Herpetology in India took off during the British colonial rule with the documentation of herpetofauna. Several studies have outlined the early history of Indian herpetology; however, few have traced the growth of this field since India’s independence. We analyse trends in Indian herpetology focusing on taxa, subfields, and authorship over the last 70 years. Of the 1177 published articles we analysed, 64.9% studied reptiles, 26.5% studied amphibians and 8.6% were general herpetofaunal studies. Frogs, lizards, and snakes being the most diverse herpetofauna groups, each accounted for 20-21% of the published articles and significantly outnumber publications on caecilians (2.3%), salamanders (0.4%), chelonians (12.6%), and crocodiles (4.4%). We found a significantly greater number of publications on Diversity & Distribution (34.2%), Taxonomy & Systematics (21.6%) and Ecology (19.4%) compared to other subfields, and detected a decline in Development, Physiology & Cytology and Evolutionary biology studies over the last four decades (1980-2019). The gender ratio among co-authors was dominated by men with only 29.7% of publications containing women authors. The overall proportion of women authors has not changed significantly over decades, but our analyses detected a significant decrease in women first authors and the proportion of women authors when the corresponding authors were men. Women authors were substantially lower in the subfield of Taxonomy & Systematics, and women published significantly more on amphibians compared to reptiles. Overall, we highlight the growth of herpetology in India from two key viewpoints, scientific pursuits, and gender parity among herpetologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Amphibia-Reptilia
Amphibia-Reptilia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Amphibia-Reptilia is a leading European multi-disciplinary journal devoted to most of the aspects of herpetology: ecology, behaviour, evolution, conservation, physiology, morphology, paleontology, genetics, and systematics. Amphibia-Reptilia publishes high quality original papers, short-notes, reviews, book reviews and news of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH). The Societas Europaea Herpteologica (SEH) website is located at: www.seh-herpetology.org.
期刊最新文献
Alligatorascension: climbing performance of Alligator mississippiensis Movement behaviour of the common frog (Rana temporaria) in an anthropized mountain landscape: integrated step selection analysis of GPS tracking data More cryptic diversity among spiny lizards of the Sceloporus torquatus complex discovered through a multilocus approach Ashes still smoking: the influence of fire and land cover on Pantanal ecoregion amphibians Saint Patrick, what about legless lizards? Tracing the mitochondrial affiliation and possible origin of Anguis (Squamata: Anguidae) population in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1