Gonadal静脉血管内和内镜介入治疗盆腔充血综合征的疗效和安全性比较分析

Q4 Medicine Flebologiya Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.17116/flebo202014031175

S. Gavrilov, A. Sazhin, G. V. Krasavin, E. Moskalenko, N. Mishakina

{"title":"Gonadal静脉血管内和内镜介入治疗盆腔充血综合征的疗效和安全性比较分析","authors":"S. Gavrilov, A. Sazhin, G. V. Krasavin, E. Moskalenko, N. Mishakina","doi":"10.17116/flebo202014031175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To compare an efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Material and methods. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients with PCS. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 67 patients who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV), the second group — 28 women who underwent endoscopic resection of gonadal veins (ERGV). A comparative analysis of efficacy of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS was based on assessment of the effect of these interventions on pelvic pain, safety of operations, their effect on pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins and restoration of daily activity. Флебология 2020, т. 14, No 3, с. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175 Flebologiya 2020, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175","PeriodicalId":37563,"journal":{"name":"Flebologiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular and Endoscopic Interventions on the Gonadal Veins in the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"S. Gavrilov, A. Sazhin, G. V. Krasavin, E. Moskalenko, N. Mishakina\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/flebo202014031175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To compare an efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Material and methods. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients with PCS. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 67 patients who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV), the second group — 28 women who underwent endoscopic resection of gonadal veins (ERGV). A comparative analysis of efficacy of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS was based on assessment of the effect of these interventions on pelvic pain, safety of operations, their effect on pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins and restoration of daily activity. Флебология 2020, т. 14, No 3, с. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175 Flebologiya 2020, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175\",\"PeriodicalId\":37563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flebologiya\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flebologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flebologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

客观的比较性腺静脉血管内和内窥镜介入治疗盆腔充血综合征（PCS）的疗效和安全性。材料和方法。对97例PCS患者的治疗结果进行分析。所有患者被分为2组。第一组包括67名接受性腺静脉血管内栓塞（EEGV）的患者，第二组是28名接受内镜下性腺静脉切除（ERGV）手术的女性。EEGV和ERGV治疗PCS的疗效比较分析是基于对这些干预措施对骨盆疼痛、手术安全性、对骨盆静脉回流、骨盆静脉直径和日常活动恢复的影响的评估。2020年。14，编号3。175-183https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175Flebologiya 2020，第14卷，第3期，第175-183页https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular and Endoscopic Interventions on the Gonadal Veins in the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Objective. To compare an efficacy and safety of endovascular and endoscopic interventions on the gonadal vein in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Material and methods. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in 97 patients with PCS. All patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included 67 patients who underwent endovascular embolization of gonadal veins (EEGV), the second group — 28 women who underwent endoscopic resection of gonadal veins (ERGV). A comparative analysis of efficacy of EEGV and ERGV in the treatment of PCS was based on assessment of the effect of these interventions on pelvic pain, safety of operations, their effect on pelvic venous reflux, diameter of the pelvic veins and restoration of daily activity. Флебология 2020, т. 14, No 3, с. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175 Flebologiya 2020, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 175-183 https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202014031175

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Flebologiya Medicine-Hematology

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Venous Disorders is a quarterly peer-reviewed medical journal. The journal highlights the key issues of prophylaxis, diagnostics and treatment of the entire spectrum of venous system diseases and their complications including acute (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, superficial thrombophlebitis) and chronic (varicose veins, post-thrombotic syndrome, chronic venous insufficiency) pathologies as well as various lymphatic lesions (lymphedema, etc.). The new edition will encompass the whole range of topical issues including recent achievements of domestic and foreign researchers, applications of innovative technologies in the clinical practice, reviews of the literature, lectures, and results of original investigations: all that can be of interest for phlebologists, vascular surgeons, other medical specialists dealing with venous pathology in their practical work. The journal was established in 2007. The only Russian journal that reflecting a broad range of problems in diagnosis, treatment and prevention of acute and chronic venous diseases.