饱和和交叉推广:手机游戏中的用户销售和交换

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Research in Marketing Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.12.001
Michael Haenlein , Barak Libai , Eitan Muller
{"title":"饱和和交叉推广:手机游戏中的用户销售和交换","authors":"Michael Haenlein ,&nbsp;Barak Libai ,&nbsp;Eitan Muller","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the main challenges facing the mobile game industry is an alarming level of satiation, that is, a decline in user engagement and consequently in ad viewing, spending, and retention. Satiation lowers users’ CLV to an extent that renders acquisition from the likes of Facebook and Google untenable, driving game publishers to cross-promote, that is, sell and swap users among themselves. We model this cross-promotion as first, a <strong><em>screening mechanism</em></strong>, in that the fact of playing a game indicates specific preferences that might be suitable to an exchange with similar games; and second, as a <strong><em>resetting mechanism</em></strong> that enables the swapped users to reset their engagement in the new game, thus rendering the swap or sell beneficial to both buyer and seller. We show that there exists an optimal level of satiation with a game, and with this level, we show the conditions under which the game publisher cross promotes, and when it does, what the conditions are for selling rather than swapping. We extend the analysis to the case in which advertising costs and conversion rates are related; explain why they might be negatively correlated, and show that our main results still hold.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 342-361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satiation and cross promotion: Selling and swapping users in mobile games\",\"authors\":\"Michael Haenlein ,&nbsp;Barak Libai ,&nbsp;Eitan Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One of the main challenges facing the mobile game industry is an alarming level of satiation, that is, a decline in user engagement and consequently in ad viewing, spending, and retention. Satiation lowers users’ CLV to an extent that renders acquisition from the likes of Facebook and Google untenable, driving game publishers to cross-promote, that is, sell and swap users among themselves. We model this cross-promotion as first, a <strong><em>screening mechanism</em></strong>, in that the fact of playing a game indicates specific preferences that might be suitable to an exchange with similar games; and second, as a <strong><em>resetting mechanism</em></strong> that enables the swapped users to reset their engagement in the new game, thus rendering the swap or sell beneficial to both buyer and seller. We show that there exists an optimal level of satiation with a game, and with this level, we show the conditions under which the game publisher cross promotes, and when it does, what the conditions are for selling rather than swapping. We extend the analysis to the case in which advertising costs and conversion rates are related; explain why they might be negatively correlated, and show that our main results still hold.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 342-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811622000829\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811622000829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

移动游戏行业面临的主要挑战之一是令人担忧的满足程度,即用户参与度下降,从而导致广告观看、支出和留存率下降。讽刺降低了用户的CLV,使从Facebook和谷歌等公司的收购变得站不住脚,促使游戏发行商进行交叉推广,即在他们之间出售和交换用户。我们将这种交叉推广建模为第一种筛选机制,因为玩游戏的事实表明了可能适合与类似游戏进行交流的特定偏好;第二,作为一种重置机制,使被交换的用户能够重置他们在新游戏中的参与,从而使交换或出售对买方和卖方都有利。我们证明了对游戏的满意度存在一个最佳水平,通过这个水平,我们展示了游戏发行商交叉推广的条件,以及当它交叉推广时,销售而不是交换的条件。我们将分析扩展到广告成本和转化率相关的情况;解释为什么它们可能呈负相关,并表明我们的主要结果仍然成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satiation and cross promotion: Selling and swapping users in mobile games

One of the main challenges facing the mobile game industry is an alarming level of satiation, that is, a decline in user engagement and consequently in ad viewing, spending, and retention. Satiation lowers users’ CLV to an extent that renders acquisition from the likes of Facebook and Google untenable, driving game publishers to cross-promote, that is, sell and swap users among themselves. We model this cross-promotion as first, a screening mechanism, in that the fact of playing a game indicates specific preferences that might be suitable to an exchange with similar games; and second, as a resetting mechanism that enables the swapped users to reset their engagement in the new game, thus rendering the swap or sell beneficial to both buyer and seller. We show that there exists an optimal level of satiation with a game, and with this level, we show the conditions under which the game publisher cross promotes, and when it does, what the conditions are for selling rather than swapping. We extend the analysis to the case in which advertising costs and conversion rates are related; explain why they might be negatively correlated, and show that our main results still hold.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research in Marketing is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed journal for marketing academics and practitioners. Building on a great tradition of global marketing scholarship, IJRM aims to contribute substantially to the field of marketing research by providing a high-quality medium for the dissemination of new marketing knowledge and methods. Among IJRM targeted audience are marketing scholars, practitioners (e.g., marketing research and consulting professionals) and other interested groups and individuals.
期刊最新文献
Gender and racial price disparities in the NFT marketplace Online reviews: A literature review and roadmap for future research A method for measuring consumer confusion due to lookalike labels Editorial Board Strange Case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer Preference Inconsistencies in Costly Price Offers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1