巴雷特食管的新型内镜治疗:叙述性回顾

G. Pellegatta, A. D. Buono, A. Repici
{"title":"巴雷特食管的新型内镜治疗:叙述性回顾","authors":"G. Pellegatta, A. D. Buono, A. Repici","doi":"10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the last decade, the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) has been broadly updated. Among the endoscopic ablative techniques, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly effective and currently represents the standard of care for the eradication of BE after endoscopic resection of visible dysplastic lesions. Newly, some thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities have been investigated for treating BE, also as first-line in case of dysplasia. Data on the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy, hybrid argon plasma coagulation (APC) and EndoRotor resection have been recently reported in the literature. We aimed to review current evidence on novel endoscopic technologies emerging with the indication of treating BE, and to discuss their limitations, advantages and potential implementation in routine clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. A PubMed search was conducted up to August 2020 to identify relevant studies. Efficacy rates, in terms of dysplasia and metaplasia eradication, assessed for the emerging thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities are promising and similar to RFA. According to the present data, post-treatment stricture occurrence appears to be low especially after Hybrid-APC and EndoRotor. The current evidence on novel endoscopic techniques needs further endorsement by randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis. The comparison of these modalities to the traditional care by the ongoing clinical trials, particularly in naïve patients is highly warranted. 10 dysplasia, and survival in EAC is stage-dependent. Patients with non-dysplastic (ND) BE or low-grade dysplasia (LGD)","PeriodicalId":72217,"journal":{"name":"Annals of esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel endoscopic therapies in Barrett’s esophagus: narrative review\",\"authors\":\"G. Pellegatta, A. D. Buono, A. Repici\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In the last decade, the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) has been broadly updated. Among the endoscopic ablative techniques, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly effective and currently represents the standard of care for the eradication of BE after endoscopic resection of visible dysplastic lesions. Newly, some thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities have been investigated for treating BE, also as first-line in case of dysplasia. Data on the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy, hybrid argon plasma coagulation (APC) and EndoRotor resection have been recently reported in the literature. We aimed to review current evidence on novel endoscopic technologies emerging with the indication of treating BE, and to discuss their limitations, advantages and potential implementation in routine clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. A PubMed search was conducted up to August 2020 to identify relevant studies. Efficacy rates, in terms of dysplasia and metaplasia eradication, assessed for the emerging thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities are promising and similar to RFA. According to the present data, post-treatment stricture occurrence appears to be low especially after Hybrid-APC and EndoRotor. The current evidence on novel endoscopic techniques needs further endorsement by randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis. The comparison of these modalities to the traditional care by the ongoing clinical trials, particularly in naïve patients is highly warranted. 10 dysplasia, and survival in EAC is stage-dependent. Patients with non-dysplastic (ND) BE or low-grade dysplasia (LGD)\",\"PeriodicalId\":72217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOE-2020-ETBE-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

:在过去的十年里,巴雷特食管(BE)的治疗方法得到了广泛的更新。在内窥镜消融技术中,射频消融(RFA)非常有效,目前是内窥镜切除可见增生异常病变后根除BE的标准护理。最近,一些热内镜和非热内镜方法已被研究用于治疗BE,也被作为异型增生的一线治疗方法。文献中最近报道了冷冻治疗、混合氩等离子体凝固(APC)和EndoRotor切除术的安全性和有效性数据。我们旨在回顾目前出现的治疗BE适应症的新型内窥镜技术的证据,并讨论其局限性、优势以及在常规临床实践和临床试验中的潜在实施。PubMed检索截至2020年8月,以确定相关研究。在不典型增生和化生根除方面,评估新出现的热内镜和非热内镜模式的有效率是有希望的,并且与RFA相似。根据目前的数据,治疗后狭窄的发生率似乎很低,尤其是在混合APC和EndoRotor之后。目前关于新型内窥镜技术的证据需要随机临床试验和荟萃分析的进一步支持。通过正在进行的临床试验,将这些模式与传统护理进行比较,特别是在幼稚患者中,是非常有必要的。10发育不良,EAC的存活率取决于分期。非发育不良(ND)BE或低度发育不良(LGD)患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novel endoscopic therapies in Barrett’s esophagus: narrative review
: In the last decade, the management of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) has been broadly updated. Among the endoscopic ablative techniques, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly effective and currently represents the standard of care for the eradication of BE after endoscopic resection of visible dysplastic lesions. Newly, some thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities have been investigated for treating BE, also as first-line in case of dysplasia. Data on the safety and efficacy of cryotherapy, hybrid argon plasma coagulation (APC) and EndoRotor resection have been recently reported in the literature. We aimed to review current evidence on novel endoscopic technologies emerging with the indication of treating BE, and to discuss their limitations, advantages and potential implementation in routine clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. A PubMed search was conducted up to August 2020 to identify relevant studies. Efficacy rates, in terms of dysplasia and metaplasia eradication, assessed for the emerging thermal and non-thermal endoscopic modalities are promising and similar to RFA. According to the present data, post-treatment stricture occurrence appears to be low especially after Hybrid-APC and EndoRotor. The current evidence on novel endoscopic techniques needs further endorsement by randomized clinical trials and meta-analysis. The comparison of these modalities to the traditional care by the ongoing clinical trials, particularly in naïve patients is highly warranted. 10 dysplasia, and survival in EAC is stage-dependent. Patients with non-dysplastic (ND) BE or low-grade dysplasia (LGD)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential impact of post-neoadjuvant stage on overall survival for surgically treated oesophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: a retrospective cohort study Endoluminal vacuum therapy using a fenestrated surgical drain for management of anastomotic leak following esophagectomy Hot potato causing full-thickness esophageal burn and perforation: a case report The sequel of age and frailty on the pathophysiology and treatment of surgical esophageal diseases Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease after one anastomosis gastric bypass, a narrative review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1