对公共部门绩效管理的看法

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Revista do Servico Publico Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.21874/rsp.v73.ia.6864
R. Vilhena, H. Martins
{"title":"对公共部门绩效管理的看法","authors":"R. Vilhena, H. Martins","doi":"10.21874/rsp.v73.ia.6864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"public administration, however, there are vagueness about its applicability. Thus, a survey was conducted to identify how public management professionals perceive concepts of “performance,” “performance management,” “performance evaluation,” and, map management practices. Six points were identified, namely, 1) the perception of managers is multidimensional and multidetermined; 2) performance management requires clarity of rules and leadership; 3) strategy, Information Technology and people management are the bases of the model; 4) between the individual and the group the focus should be on the latter; 5) mitigating problems between the individual and institutional perspectives requires strategic direction; and, 6) the challenges to assess performance are the low quality of leadership, non-meritocratic culture, gaming and bureaucratization. These results combined with good practices collaborate to a performance management model with public value.","PeriodicalId":43013,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Servico Publico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percepções sobre gestão do desempenho no setor público\",\"authors\":\"R. Vilhena, H. Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.21874/rsp.v73.ia.6864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"public administration, however, there are vagueness about its applicability. Thus, a survey was conducted to identify how public management professionals perceive concepts of “performance,” “performance management,” “performance evaluation,” and, map management practices. Six points were identified, namely, 1) the perception of managers is multidimensional and multidetermined; 2) performance management requires clarity of rules and leadership; 3) strategy, Information Technology and people management are the bases of the model; 4) between the individual and the group the focus should be on the latter; 5) mitigating problems between the individual and institutional perspectives requires strategic direction; and, 6) the challenges to assess performance are the low quality of leadership, non-meritocratic culture, gaming and bureaucratization. These results combined with good practices collaborate to a performance management model with public value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Servico Publico\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Servico Publico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v73.ia.6864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Servico Publico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v73.ia.6864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

然而,公共行政对其适用性存在模糊性。因此,进行了一项调查,以确定公共管理专业人员如何看待“绩效”、“绩效管理”、“业绩评估”等概念,并绘制管理实践图。确定了六点,即:1)管理者的认知是多层面的、多因素的;2) 绩效管理需要明确的规则和领导力;3) 战略、信息技术和人员管理是该模型的基础;4) 在个人和群体之间,重点应该放在后者;5) 缓解个人和机构视角之间的问题需要战略方向;以及,6)评估绩效的挑战是领导素质低、非精英文化、游戏和官僚化。这些结果与良好实践相结合,形成了具有公共价值的绩效管理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percepções sobre gestão do desempenho no setor público
public administration, however, there are vagueness about its applicability. Thus, a survey was conducted to identify how public management professionals perceive concepts of “performance,” “performance management,” “performance evaluation,” and, map management practices. Six points were identified, namely, 1) the perception of managers is multidimensional and multidetermined; 2) performance management requires clarity of rules and leadership; 3) strategy, Information Technology and people management are the bases of the model; 4) between the individual and the group the focus should be on the latter; 5) mitigating problems between the individual and institutional perspectives requires strategic direction; and, 6) the challenges to assess performance are the low quality of leadership, non-meritocratic culture, gaming and bureaucratization. These results combined with good practices collaborate to a performance management model with public value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista do Servico Publico
Revista do Servico Publico PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Fatores Sociotécnicos na adoção de Artefatos baseados em blockchain para Governo Criminalidade e o setor público: a importância da capacidade pública de realização de gastos sociais no combate aos crimes violentos no Brasil Factors associated with the use of e-Government practices: a survey applied to civil servants Challenges in citizen's digital interaction with the State: a scale to measure administrative burden Privacy and Regulation: digital tracking on the Internet under the General Law of Personal Data Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1