基于模糊Borda法的在线学习者学习绩效评价

Hongbing Lin, Dongdong Lin
{"title":"基于模糊Borda法的在线学习者学习绩效评价","authors":"Hongbing Lin, Dongdong Lin","doi":"10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the traditional evaluation system of learning focuses only on the summative evaluation of learners’ test scores, ignoring the process evaluation of learners in learning process, the evaluation system should not only consider the content of the online learning process but also that of face-to-face classroom teaching process to evaluate learners’ learning performance in multiple dimensions and levels. This approach evaluates online learning more reasonably, operably and feasibly. To overcome limitation of using more than one method in the evaluation of learning performance, the learning performance of online learners was first evaluated using the principal component analysis method, entropy method, comprehensive indicator method, and TOPSIS method. Based on these four evaluation results, a combination evaluation model of online learners’ learning performance was constructed. The Fuzzy Borda method was used to evaluate nine administrative classes of accounting majors in three colleges and universities in Hainan. The results show that simply using a single evaluation method to evaluate the learning performance of online learners has defects, and the evaluation results are too biased. By using the Fuzzy Borda method, multiple evaluation methods can be combined, allowing a single evaluation method to realize complementary advantages and obtain more comprehensive and credible evaluation results. Using the Fuzzy Borda method to systematically evaluate the learning performance of online learners improves the scientificity of evaluation results and provides a new idea and method for the evaluation of online learning performance. The results of this study have significant reference value for using scientific evaluation methods and objective data to evaluate online learning performance, rank online learners scientifically, and summarize teaching experience to improve online learning performance.","PeriodicalId":47933,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Online Learners’ Learning Performance Based on Fuzzy Borda Method\",\"authors\":\"Hongbing Lin, Dongdong Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the traditional evaluation system of learning focuses only on the summative evaluation of learners’ test scores, ignoring the process evaluation of learners in learning process, the evaluation system should not only consider the content of the online learning process but also that of face-to-face classroom teaching process to evaluate learners’ learning performance in multiple dimensions and levels. This approach evaluates online learning more reasonably, operably and feasibly. To overcome limitation of using more than one method in the evaluation of learning performance, the learning performance of online learners was first evaluated using the principal component analysis method, entropy method, comprehensive indicator method, and TOPSIS method. Based on these four evaluation results, a combination evaluation model of online learners’ learning performance was constructed. The Fuzzy Borda method was used to evaluate nine administrative classes of accounting majors in three colleges and universities in Hainan. The results show that simply using a single evaluation method to evaluate the learning performance of online learners has defects, and the evaluation results are too biased. By using the Fuzzy Borda method, multiple evaluation methods can be combined, allowing a single evaluation method to realize complementary advantages and obtain more comprehensive and credible evaluation results. Using the Fuzzy Borda method to systematically evaluate the learning performance of online learners improves the scientificity of evaluation results and provides a new idea and method for the evaluation of online learning performance. The results of this study have significant reference value for using scientific evaluation methods and objective data to evaluate online learning performance, rank online learners scientifically, and summarize teaching experience to improve online learning performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.40397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于传统的学习评价体系只注重对学习者考试成绩的总结性评价,而忽视了对学习者在学习过程中的过程性评价,评价体系不仅要考虑在线学习过程的内容,还要考虑面对面课堂教学过程的内容来多维度、多层次地评价学习者的学习成绩。这种方法对在线学习进行了更合理、更可操作、更可行的评估。为了克服使用多种方法评估学习成绩的局限性,首先使用主成分分析法、熵法、综合指标法和TOPSIS法对在线学习者的学习成绩进行了评估。基于这四个评价结果,构建了网络学习者学习成绩的组合评价模型。采用模糊-博尔达方法对海南省三所高校会计专业的9个管理类进行了评价。结果表明,简单地使用单一的评价方法来评价在线学习者的学习成绩存在缺陷,而且评价结果过于偏颇。通过使用模糊-博尔达方法,可以将多种评价方法相结合,使单一的评价方法实现优势互补,获得更全面、更可信的评价结果。运用模糊-博尔达方法对在线学习者的学习成绩进行系统评价,提高了评价结果的科学性,为在线学习成绩的评价提供了新的思路和方法。本研究结果对运用科学的评价方法和客观数据评价在线学习成绩、科学地对在线学习者进行排名、总结教学经验以提高在线学习成绩具有重要的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Online Learners’ Learning Performance Based on Fuzzy Borda Method
Since the traditional evaluation system of learning focuses only on the summative evaluation of learners’ test scores, ignoring the process evaluation of learners in learning process, the evaluation system should not only consider the content of the online learning process but also that of face-to-face classroom teaching process to evaluate learners’ learning performance in multiple dimensions and levels. This approach evaluates online learning more reasonably, operably and feasibly. To overcome limitation of using more than one method in the evaluation of learning performance, the learning performance of online learners was first evaluated using the principal component analysis method, entropy method, comprehensive indicator method, and TOPSIS method. Based on these four evaluation results, a combination evaluation model of online learners’ learning performance was constructed. The Fuzzy Borda method was used to evaluate nine administrative classes of accounting majors in three colleges and universities in Hainan. The results show that simply using a single evaluation method to evaluate the learning performance of online learners has defects, and the evaluation results are too biased. By using the Fuzzy Borda method, multiple evaluation methods can be combined, allowing a single evaluation method to realize complementary advantages and obtain more comprehensive and credible evaluation results. Using the Fuzzy Borda method to systematically evaluate the learning performance of online learners improves the scientificity of evaluation results and provides a new idea and method for the evaluation of online learning performance. The results of this study have significant reference value for using scientific evaluation methods and objective data to evaluate online learning performance, rank online learners scientifically, and summarize teaching experience to improve online learning performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal focuses on the exchange of relevant trends and research results and presents practical experiences gained while developing and testing elements of technology enhanced learning. It bridges the gap between pure academic research journals and more practical publications. So it covers the full range from research, application development to experience reports and product descriptions. Fields of interest include, but are not limited to: -Software / Distributed Systems -Knowledge Management -Semantic Web -MashUp Technologies -Platforms and Content Authoring -New Learning Models and Applications -Pedagogical and Psychological Issues -Trust / Security -Internet Applications -Networked Tools -Mobile / wireless -Electronics -Visualisation -Bio- / Neuroinformatics -Language /Speech -Collaboration Tools / Collaborative Networks
期刊最新文献
Information and communications technology (ICT) and academic excellence at the Federal University Wukari, Taraba State Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Consider Teachers Needs and Concerns in the Design of Educational Technology (EdTAM) Online Teaching Quality Evaluation: Entropy TOPSIS and Grouped Regression Model Personalizing Students' Learning Needs by a Teaching Decision Optimization Method Adoption of Internet of Things in the Higher Educational Institutions: Perspectives from South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1