纯真计划:从创始人到村庄的未来世代

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN Arizona Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-10-03 DOI:10.1353/arq.2020.0016
Stacey Margolis
{"title":"纯真计划:从创始人到村庄的未来世代","authors":"Stacey Margolis","doi":"10.1353/arq.2020.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay explores the philosophical roots of the idea that Americans have an obligation to future generations, beginning with Thomas Jefferson’s claim that “the earth belongs in usufruct to the living.” In arguing that living people had no right to bind future people (with debts or laws they had no hand in shaping), Jefferson was making one of the earliest versions of the political claim for intergenerational justice. I then examine the way this idea reemerges in our contemporary moment—in the environmental movement, anxieties about parenting, and films, like The Village, The Truman Show, Pleasantville, WALL-E, The Witch, and Captain Fantastic, that fantasize the creation of pristine, sealed-off, pseudo-utopias. I focus throughout on The Village, because its particular version of a vexed utopia reveals not only the logic of intergenerational justice, but also its limitations.","PeriodicalId":42394,"journal":{"name":"Arizona Quarterly","volume":"76 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Innocence Project: Future Generations from the Founders to The Village\",\"authors\":\"Stacey Margolis\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/arq.2020.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay explores the philosophical roots of the idea that Americans have an obligation to future generations, beginning with Thomas Jefferson’s claim that “the earth belongs in usufruct to the living.” In arguing that living people had no right to bind future people (with debts or laws they had no hand in shaping), Jefferson was making one of the earliest versions of the political claim for intergenerational justice. I then examine the way this idea reemerges in our contemporary moment—in the environmental movement, anxieties about parenting, and films, like The Village, The Truman Show, Pleasantville, WALL-E, The Witch, and Captain Fantastic, that fantasize the creation of pristine, sealed-off, pseudo-utopias. I focus throughout on The Village, because its particular version of a vexed utopia reveals not only the logic of intergenerational justice, but also its limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/arq.2020.0016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/arq.2020.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了美国人对子孙后代负有义务这一观点的哲学根源,从托马斯·杰斐逊的“地球属于活着的人的用益权”开始。他认为活着的人无权约束未来的人(他们无权制定债务或法律),杰斐逊提出了最早的代际正义政治主张。然后,我研究了这种想法在我们当代的重新出现的方式——在环境运动、对养育子女的焦虑,以及电影中,如《村庄》、《杜鲁门秀》、《欢乐谷》、《WALL-E》、《女巫》和《神奇队长》,这些电影幻想着创造原始、封闭的伪乌托邦。我一直关注《村庄》,因为它对一个令人烦恼的乌托邦的特殊版本不仅揭示了代际正义的逻辑,也揭示了它的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Innocence Project: Future Generations from the Founders to The Village
Abstract:This essay explores the philosophical roots of the idea that Americans have an obligation to future generations, beginning with Thomas Jefferson’s claim that “the earth belongs in usufruct to the living.” In arguing that living people had no right to bind future people (with debts or laws they had no hand in shaping), Jefferson was making one of the earliest versions of the political claim for intergenerational justice. I then examine the way this idea reemerges in our contemporary moment—in the environmental movement, anxieties about parenting, and films, like The Village, The Truman Show, Pleasantville, WALL-E, The Witch, and Captain Fantastic, that fantasize the creation of pristine, sealed-off, pseudo-utopias. I focus throughout on The Village, because its particular version of a vexed utopia reveals not only the logic of intergenerational justice, but also its limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arizona Quarterly
Arizona Quarterly LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Arizona Quarterly publishes scholarly essays on American literature, culture, and theory. It is our mission to subject these categories to debate, argument, interpretation, and contestation via critical readings of primary texts. We accept essays that are grounded in textual, formal, cultural, and theoretical examination of texts and situated with respect to current academic conversations whilst extending the boundaries thereof.
期刊最新文献
"Anything Might Happen": Spatial Metaphor, Instability, and Escape in Nella Larsen's Passing Deconstructing the Christian Anarcho-Fascism of Atlas Shrugged The Realm of Hazard: James Merrill Goes West "So rich a field of romantic incident": Disruptive Excess in Tourgée's A Royal Gentleman Astro-logic: Conspiracy as Compensation and the Palliative Paranoia of Don DeLillo's Libra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1