手势的普遍性和多样性

IF 0.7 4区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Gesture Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1075/gest.19011.coo
Kensy Cooperrider
{"title":"手势的普遍性和多样性","authors":"Kensy Cooperrider","doi":"10.1075/gest.19011.coo","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At the dawn of anthropology, gesture was widely considered a “universal language”. In the 20th century, however,\n this framing fell out of favor as anthropologists rejected universalism in favor of relativism. These polemical positions were\n largely fueled by high-flying rhetoric and second-hand report; researchers had neither the data nor the conceptual frameworks to\n stake out substantive positions. Today we have much more data, but our frameworks remain underdeveloped and often implicit. Here,\n I outline several emerging conceptual tools that help us make sense of universals and diversity in gesture. I then sketch the\n state of our knowledge about a handful of gestural phenomena, further developing these conceptual tools on the way. This brief\n survey underscores a clear conclusion: gesture is unmistakably similar around the world while also being broadly diverse. Our task\n ahead is to put polemics aside and explore this duality systematically – and soon, before gestural diversity dwindles further.","PeriodicalId":35125,"journal":{"name":"Gesture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universals and diversity in gesture\",\"authors\":\"Kensy Cooperrider\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/gest.19011.coo\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n At the dawn of anthropology, gesture was widely considered a “universal language”. In the 20th century, however,\\n this framing fell out of favor as anthropologists rejected universalism in favor of relativism. These polemical positions were\\n largely fueled by high-flying rhetoric and second-hand report; researchers had neither the data nor the conceptual frameworks to\\n stake out substantive positions. Today we have much more data, but our frameworks remain underdeveloped and often implicit. Here,\\n I outline several emerging conceptual tools that help us make sense of universals and diversity in gesture. I then sketch the\\n state of our knowledge about a handful of gestural phenomena, further developing these conceptual tools on the way. This brief\\n survey underscores a clear conclusion: gesture is unmistakably similar around the world while also being broadly diverse. Our task\\n ahead is to put polemics aside and explore this duality systematically – and soon, before gestural diversity dwindles further.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19011.coo\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19011.coo","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在人类学诞生之初,手势被广泛认为是一种“通用语言”。然而,在20世纪,由于人类学家拒绝普遍主义而支持相对主义,这种框架失宠了。这些争论性的立场在很大程度上是由夸夸其谈和二手报道推动的;研究人员既没有数据,也没有概念框架来表明实质性立场。今天,我们有了更多的数据,但我们的框架仍然不完善,而且往往是隐含的。在这里,我概述了一些新兴的概念工具,这些工具有助于我们理解手势的普遍性和多样性。然后,我勾勒出我们对一些手势现象的知识状态,并在途中进一步开发这些概念工具。这项简短的调查强调了一个明确的结论:手势在世界各地无疑是相似的,但也有广泛的多样性。我们未来的任务是把争论放在一边,系统地探索这种二元性——很快,在手势多样性进一步减少之前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Universals and diversity in gesture
At the dawn of anthropology, gesture was widely considered a “universal language”. In the 20th century, however, this framing fell out of favor as anthropologists rejected universalism in favor of relativism. These polemical positions were largely fueled by high-flying rhetoric and second-hand report; researchers had neither the data nor the conceptual frameworks to stake out substantive positions. Today we have much more data, but our frameworks remain underdeveloped and often implicit. Here, I outline several emerging conceptual tools that help us make sense of universals and diversity in gesture. I then sketch the state of our knowledge about a handful of gestural phenomena, further developing these conceptual tools on the way. This brief survey underscores a clear conclusion: gesture is unmistakably similar around the world while also being broadly diverse. Our task ahead is to put polemics aside and explore this duality systematically – and soon, before gestural diversity dwindles further.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesture
Gesture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Gesture publishes articles reporting original research, as well as survey and review articles, on all aspects of gesture. The journal aims to stimulate and facilitate scholarly communication between the different disciplines within which work on gesture is conducted. For this reason papers written in the spirit of cooperation between disciplines are especially encouraged. Topics may include, but are by no means limited to: the relationship between gesture and speech; the role gesture may play in communication in all the circumstances of social interaction, including conversations, the work-place or instructional settings; gesture and cognition; the development of gesture in children.
期刊最新文献
The development of speech and gesture in Sesotho narratives Chimpanzees coordinate interrogative markers to ask questions Do gestures reflect children’s lexical retrieval difficulties? Demographic, neuropsychological, and speech variables that impact iconic and supplementary-to-speech gesturing in aphasia Demographic, neuropsychological, and speech variables that impact iconic and supplementary-to-speech gesturing in aphasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1