教育与教学科学博士课程“科学史与哲学”

Q1 Arts and Humanities Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Pub Date : 2019-03-08 DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-79-93
A. R. Sadyikova, E. Nikitina, A. V. Korzhuev, Yuliya B. Ikrennikova
{"title":"教育与教学科学博士课程“科学史与哲学”","authors":"A. R. Sadyikova, E. Nikitina, A. V. Korzhuev, Yuliya B. Ikrennikova","doi":"10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-79-93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Russian pedagogical community has recently faced a new challenge generated by the introduction of emerging conceptual framework for doctoral education treated as the third level of higher education system. The framework for doctoral education covers some typical study programs such as “Methods & technics of pedagogical research” as well as some new ones, including “Academic writing” and competence-based teaching for the traditional postgraduate training. Our argument concerns the course syllabus “History & philosophy of science” aimed at developing the research skills of doctoral students in education. This course is an integral part of the emerging system for doctoral training in Russia. We analyze some philosophical foundations of contemporary pedagogical science, including logical empiricism, Popper’s falsifiability, Paradigm Thesis by Thomas Kuhn, science theories by Paul Feyerabend and Stephen Toulmin, as well as correspondence, pragmatic, conventional and coherent theories of truth. We examine the impact of philosophy of science on methodology of pedagogical education in the context of the history of pedagogical thought. Our conclusion is that despite their poor logical conditions, pedagogical science and research methods benefit from the ideas of philosophy of science that also contributes greatly to the subfield of pedagogical methodology. We seek to optimize the study program of doctoral training syllabus “History and philosophy of science” for doctoral students in education.","PeriodicalId":37083,"journal":{"name":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Course “History & Philosophy of Science” for Doctoral Programs in Education and Pedagogical Sciences\",\"authors\":\"A. R. Sadyikova, E. Nikitina, A. V. Korzhuev, Yuliya B. Ikrennikova\",\"doi\":\"10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-79-93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Russian pedagogical community has recently faced a new challenge generated by the introduction of emerging conceptual framework for doctoral education treated as the third level of higher education system. The framework for doctoral education covers some typical study programs such as “Methods & technics of pedagogical research” as well as some new ones, including “Academic writing” and competence-based teaching for the traditional postgraduate training. Our argument concerns the course syllabus “History & philosophy of science” aimed at developing the research skills of doctoral students in education. This course is an integral part of the emerging system for doctoral training in Russia. We analyze some philosophical foundations of contemporary pedagogical science, including logical empiricism, Popper’s falsifiability, Paradigm Thesis by Thomas Kuhn, science theories by Paul Feyerabend and Stephen Toulmin, as well as correspondence, pragmatic, conventional and coherent theories of truth. We examine the impact of philosophy of science on methodology of pedagogical education in the context of the history of pedagogical thought. Our conclusion is that despite their poor logical conditions, pedagogical science and research methods benefit from the ideas of philosophy of science that also contributes greatly to the subfield of pedagogical methodology. We seek to optimize the study program of doctoral training syllabus “History and philosophy of science” for doctoral students in education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-79-93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-2-79-93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

俄罗斯教育界最近面临着一个新的挑战,这是由于引入了新的博士教育概念框架,将其视为高等教育系统的第三层次。博士教育的框架涵盖了一些典型的研究项目,如“教学研究方法与技术”,以及一些新的项目,包括“学术写作”和传统研究生培养的能力本位教学。我们的论点涉及旨在培养博士生教育研究技能的课程大纲“科学史与哲学”。该课程是俄罗斯新兴的博士培养体系的一个组成部分。我们分析了当代教育学的一些哲学基础,包括逻辑经验主义、波普尔的可证伪性、托马斯·库恩的范式论文、保罗·费耶拉本德和斯蒂芬·图尔明的科学理论,以及对应论、语用论、传统论和连贯论。我们从教育思想史的角度来考察科学哲学对教育方法论的影响。我们的结论是,尽管教学科学和研究方法的逻辑条件较差,但它们受益于科学哲学思想,而科学哲学思想也对教学方法论的子领域做出了巨大贡献。我们寻求优化教育学博士生的博士培养大纲“科学史与哲学”的学习计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Course “History & Philosophy of Science” for Doctoral Programs in Education and Pedagogical Sciences
Russian pedagogical community has recently faced a new challenge generated by the introduction of emerging conceptual framework for doctoral education treated as the third level of higher education system. The framework for doctoral education covers some typical study programs such as “Methods & technics of pedagogical research” as well as some new ones, including “Academic writing” and competence-based teaching for the traditional postgraduate training. Our argument concerns the course syllabus “History & philosophy of science” aimed at developing the research skills of doctoral students in education. This course is an integral part of the emerging system for doctoral training in Russia. We analyze some philosophical foundations of contemporary pedagogical science, including logical empiricism, Popper’s falsifiability, Paradigm Thesis by Thomas Kuhn, science theories by Paul Feyerabend and Stephen Toulmin, as well as correspondence, pragmatic, conventional and coherent theories of truth. We examine the impact of philosophy of science on methodology of pedagogical education in the context of the history of pedagogical thought. Our conclusion is that despite their poor logical conditions, pedagogical science and research methods benefit from the ideas of philosophy of science that also contributes greatly to the subfield of pedagogical methodology. We seek to optimize the study program of doctoral training syllabus “History and philosophy of science” for doctoral students in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii
Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms for Activating the Personal Potential of Students in the Context of Digitalization of University Education Russia’s State Policy on the Development of Science at Universities: Lessons from the 90s Image of Higher Educational Institutions: Features of Perception by Graduating Class Students The ADDIE Model in Instructional Design: NUST MISIS Case Study Online Education after the Pandemic: Student Problems and Opportunities Research Using Big Data Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1