鼻腔吹气后眼眶皮下肺气肿

Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.3390/reports5020021
Riku Mihara, Y. Murai, Shun Sato, Fumihiro Matano, A. Morita
{"title":"鼻腔吹气后眼眶皮下肺气肿","authors":"Riku Mihara, Y. Murai, Shun Sato, Fumihiro Matano, A. Morita","doi":"10.3390/reports5020021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orbital emphysema after nose-blowing is an uncommon condition and can appear without a trigger. Herein, we reported a case of orbital emphysema after nose-blowing and performed a literature review. A 68-year-old man fell and sustained an injury near his left orbit. No symptoms were noted. He noticed a left periorbital swelling after blowing his nose. Through computed tomography examination, he was diagnosed with subcutaneous emphysema. There are no previous reports that have reviewed the clinical features, need for surgery, and severity of symptoms of subcutaneous emphysema after nasal swallowing due to different factors. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 48 cases by searching PubMed to clarify these issues. Regarding the emphysema trigger, 21 cases had an injury or had previously undergone surgery. In 34 cases, conservative treatment was required, while surgery was selected in the acute phase in 6 cases and after the acute phase as a radical cure in 8 cases. Reduced visual acuity, diplopia, exophthalmos, facial hypoesthesia, and color disorders were noted and were more common among surgical cases. The literature review revealed no association between fracture location and the need for surgery; furthermore, surgery was less required in non-trauma cases, excluding osteoma, than in trauma cases (p = 0.0169). Our study reveals that a strict follow-up examination of visual symptoms is necessary for the first 2 days in cases of subcutaneous emphysema caused by nose blowing after facial trauma.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcutaneous Emphysema of the Orbit after Nose-Blowing\",\"authors\":\"Riku Mihara, Y. Murai, Shun Sato, Fumihiro Matano, A. Morita\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/reports5020021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Orbital emphysema after nose-blowing is an uncommon condition and can appear without a trigger. Herein, we reported a case of orbital emphysema after nose-blowing and performed a literature review. A 68-year-old man fell and sustained an injury near his left orbit. No symptoms were noted. He noticed a left periorbital swelling after blowing his nose. Through computed tomography examination, he was diagnosed with subcutaneous emphysema. There are no previous reports that have reviewed the clinical features, need for surgery, and severity of symptoms of subcutaneous emphysema after nasal swallowing due to different factors. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 48 cases by searching PubMed to clarify these issues. Regarding the emphysema trigger, 21 cases had an injury or had previously undergone surgery. In 34 cases, conservative treatment was required, while surgery was selected in the acute phase in 6 cases and after the acute phase as a radical cure in 8 cases. Reduced visual acuity, diplopia, exophthalmos, facial hypoesthesia, and color disorders were noted and were more common among surgical cases. The literature review revealed no association between fracture location and the need for surgery; furthermore, surgery was less required in non-trauma cases, excluding osteoma, than in trauma cases (p = 0.0169). Our study reveals that a strict follow-up examination of visual symptoms is necessary for the first 2 days in cases of subcutaneous emphysema caused by nose blowing after facial trauma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports5020021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports5020021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻腔吹气后的眼眶肺气肿是一种罕见的情况,可能在没有触发的情况下出现。在此,我们报告了一例鼻腔吹气后眼眶肺气肿的病例,并进行了文献回顾。一名68岁的男子在左眼眶附近摔倒受伤。未发现任何症状。吹完鼻子后,他注意到左眶周肿胀。通过计算机断层扫描检查,他被诊断为皮下肺气肿。以前没有报道回顾过由于不同因素引起的鼻吞咽后皮下气肿的临床特征、手术需要和症状严重程度。我们通过检索PubMed对48例病例进行了回顾性分析,以澄清这些问题。关于肺气肿的诱因,21例患者曾受伤或接受过手术。34例需要保守治疗,6例在急性期选择手术治疗,8例在急性后选择手术治疗。视力下降、复视、眼球突出、面部感觉减退和颜色障碍在外科病例中更为常见。文献综述显示,骨折位置与手术需求之间没有关联;此外,除骨瘤外,非创伤病例比创伤病例需要更少的手术(p=0.0169)。我们的研究表明,对于面部创伤后由吹鼻引起的皮下气肿,在最初两天内有必要对视觉症状进行严格的随访检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Subcutaneous Emphysema of the Orbit after Nose-Blowing
Orbital emphysema after nose-blowing is an uncommon condition and can appear without a trigger. Herein, we reported a case of orbital emphysema after nose-blowing and performed a literature review. A 68-year-old man fell and sustained an injury near his left orbit. No symptoms were noted. He noticed a left periorbital swelling after blowing his nose. Through computed tomography examination, he was diagnosed with subcutaneous emphysema. There are no previous reports that have reviewed the clinical features, need for surgery, and severity of symptoms of subcutaneous emphysema after nasal swallowing due to different factors. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 48 cases by searching PubMed to clarify these issues. Regarding the emphysema trigger, 21 cases had an injury or had previously undergone surgery. In 34 cases, conservative treatment was required, while surgery was selected in the acute phase in 6 cases and after the acute phase as a radical cure in 8 cases. Reduced visual acuity, diplopia, exophthalmos, facial hypoesthesia, and color disorders were noted and were more common among surgical cases. The literature review revealed no association between fracture location and the need for surgery; furthermore, surgery was less required in non-trauma cases, excluding osteoma, than in trauma cases (p = 0.0169). Our study reveals that a strict follow-up examination of visual symptoms is necessary for the first 2 days in cases of subcutaneous emphysema caused by nose blowing after facial trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1