求解逆多准则排序问题的一种交互式方法

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Pub Date : 2020-06-29 DOI:10.1002/mcda.1719
Özgür Özpeynirci, Selin Özpeynirci, Vincent Mousseau
{"title":"求解逆多准则排序问题的一种交互式方法","authors":"Özgür Özpeynirci,&nbsp;Selin Özpeynirci,&nbsp;Vincent Mousseau","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multiple criteria sorting is the problem of assigning objects that are evaluated on multiple criteria to ordered classes. In inverse multiple criteria sorting problem, the assignment of objects to classes is known. The decision maker (DM) can implement actions to improve the scores of objects on criteria, thus enabling the assignment of objects to better classes.</p><p>In inverse multiple criteria sorting problems, two types of questions arise: (1) What is the set of actions that will result in the desired classification with minimum cost? and 2) What is the set of actions to obtain the best classification without exceeding a predetermined budget? There exist two versions for each question: (i) Simple version, where the parameters of the sorting method are known and (ii) Robust version, where the parameters are not fully known.</p><p>In this article, we focus on the case where the DM does not provide any budget limitation or desired classifications a priori. By implementing more actions, that is, by spending more money, better classifications may be obtained. We aim to analyse the trade-off between cost and classification, and determine the set of actions that will result in the most preferred cost-classification compromise by the DM. We develop an approach that proceeds interactively with the DM, and determines such most preferred set of actions. The developed approach assumes the simple version and uses MR-Sort as sorting model. We provide a detailed illustrative example on a real life problem and present the progress of the interactive algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":"28 3-4","pages":"160-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1719","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interactive approach for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem\",\"authors\":\"Özgür Özpeynirci,&nbsp;Selin Özpeynirci,&nbsp;Vincent Mousseau\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcda.1719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Multiple criteria sorting is the problem of assigning objects that are evaluated on multiple criteria to ordered classes. In inverse multiple criteria sorting problem, the assignment of objects to classes is known. The decision maker (DM) can implement actions to improve the scores of objects on criteria, thus enabling the assignment of objects to better classes.</p><p>In inverse multiple criteria sorting problems, two types of questions arise: (1) What is the set of actions that will result in the desired classification with minimum cost? and 2) What is the set of actions to obtain the best classification without exceeding a predetermined budget? There exist two versions for each question: (i) Simple version, where the parameters of the sorting method are known and (ii) Robust version, where the parameters are not fully known.</p><p>In this article, we focus on the case where the DM does not provide any budget limitation or desired classifications a priori. By implementing more actions, that is, by spending more money, better classifications may be obtained. We aim to analyse the trade-off between cost and classification, and determine the set of actions that will result in the most preferred cost-classification compromise by the DM. We develop an approach that proceeds interactively with the DM, and determines such most preferred set of actions. The developed approach assumes the simple version and uses MR-Sort as sorting model. We provide a detailed illustrative example on a real life problem and present the progress of the interactive algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"volume\":\"28 3-4\",\"pages\":\"160-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcda.1719\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

多条件排序是将根据多个条件求值的对象分配给有序类的问题。在逆多标准排序问题中,对象到类的分配是已知的。决策者(DM)可以实现操作来提高对象在标准上的分数,从而允许将对象分配给更好的类。在逆多标准排序问题中,会出现两种类型的问题:(1)以最小的代价产生期望分类的一组操作是什么?2)在不超出预定预算的情况下获得最佳分类的一组动作是什么?每个问题有两个版本:(i)简单版本,其中排序方法的参数是已知的;(ii)鲁棒版本,其中参数是不完全已知的。在本文中,我们关注的是DM不提供任何预算限制或期望的先验分类的情况。通过实施更多的行动,也就是说,通过花费更多的钱,可以获得更好的分类。我们的目标是分析成本和分类之间的权衡,并确定将导致DM最喜欢的成本分类折衷的行动集。我们开发了一种与DM交互进行的方法,并确定了这种最喜欢的行动集。所开发的方法采用简单版本,并使用MR-Sort作为排序模型。我们提供了一个实际问题的详细示例,并介绍了交互式算法的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An interactive approach for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem

Multiple criteria sorting is the problem of assigning objects that are evaluated on multiple criteria to ordered classes. In inverse multiple criteria sorting problem, the assignment of objects to classes is known. The decision maker (DM) can implement actions to improve the scores of objects on criteria, thus enabling the assignment of objects to better classes.

In inverse multiple criteria sorting problems, two types of questions arise: (1) What is the set of actions that will result in the desired classification with minimum cost? and 2) What is the set of actions to obtain the best classification without exceeding a predetermined budget? There exist two versions for each question: (i) Simple version, where the parameters of the sorting method are known and (ii) Robust version, where the parameters are not fully known.

In this article, we focus on the case where the DM does not provide any budget limitation or desired classifications a priori. By implementing more actions, that is, by spending more money, better classifications may be obtained. We aim to analyse the trade-off between cost and classification, and determine the set of actions that will result in the most preferred cost-classification compromise by the DM. We develop an approach that proceeds interactively with the DM, and determines such most preferred set of actions. The developed approach assumes the simple version and uses MR-Sort as sorting model. We provide a detailed illustrative example on a real life problem and present the progress of the interactive algorithm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Bibliometric Exploration of Multiple Criteria Decision Aid and Clustering—A Conceptual Taxonomy Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals: Stepwise Benchmarking Approach Charting the evolutionary conceptual pathway of analytic network process research: A main path analysis Socio-economic strategy for settlement of refugees amidst crisis: The case of Pak-Afghan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1