Sunil Nandankar, Amit Sachan, A. Mukherjee, Arnab Adhikari
{"title":"电子服务质量(e-SQ)衡量:跨职能审查","authors":"Sunil Nandankar, Amit Sachan, A. Mukherjee, Arnab Adhikari","doi":"10.1108/ijqrm-05-2021-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAlthough comprehensive work has been conducted in several scholarly journals in electronic service quality (e-SQ) measurement, there has been no cross-functional review of these studies. The majority of the review studies focus on e-SQ assessment in the field of electronic retail. This paper explores and synthesizes e-SQ evaluation work across the various functional domains in the last two decades and maps critical methodological challenges. It further classifies the dimensions used by researchers in six broad categories for better comprehension.Design/methodology/approachTo analyze and appreciate past e-SQ measurement research, a content assessment of the 50 most relevant research papers from various functional domains drawn from prestigious repositories was undertaken.FindingsThe results indicate shortcomings noticed in methodological issues in the e-SQ measurement research like research approaches, data analysis procedures, sampling methods, generation and purification of items, validity and reliability assessment, and dimensionality analysis. It further reveals that though e-SQ is multi-dimensional and context-specific, dimensions like content/information quality, website design, ease of use/usability, efficiency, security/and privacy, responsiveness, reliability, customer service, trust and fulfillment have been consistently cited in the reviewed studies across the various functional domains.Originality/valueAn assessment of 50 publications over the past 2 decades identifies key areas of concern in the existing research on e-SQ measurement in various functional domains for scholars and professionals. This study also provides a unique categorization of e-SQ dimensions used in various functional domains and has the potential to guide future research.","PeriodicalId":14193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic service quality (e-SQ) measurement: a cross-functional review\",\"authors\":\"Sunil Nandankar, Amit Sachan, A. Mukherjee, Arnab Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijqrm-05-2021-0153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeAlthough comprehensive work has been conducted in several scholarly journals in electronic service quality (e-SQ) measurement, there has been no cross-functional review of these studies. The majority of the review studies focus on e-SQ assessment in the field of electronic retail. This paper explores and synthesizes e-SQ evaluation work across the various functional domains in the last two decades and maps critical methodological challenges. It further classifies the dimensions used by researchers in six broad categories for better comprehension.Design/methodology/approachTo analyze and appreciate past e-SQ measurement research, a content assessment of the 50 most relevant research papers from various functional domains drawn from prestigious repositories was undertaken.FindingsThe results indicate shortcomings noticed in methodological issues in the e-SQ measurement research like research approaches, data analysis procedures, sampling methods, generation and purification of items, validity and reliability assessment, and dimensionality analysis. It further reveals that though e-SQ is multi-dimensional and context-specific, dimensions like content/information quality, website design, ease of use/usability, efficiency, security/and privacy, responsiveness, reliability, customer service, trust and fulfillment have been consistently cited in the reviewed studies across the various functional domains.Originality/valueAn assessment of 50 publications over the past 2 decades identifies key areas of concern in the existing research on e-SQ measurement in various functional domains for scholars and professionals. This study also provides a unique categorization of e-SQ dimensions used in various functional domains and has the potential to guide future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-05-2021-0153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-05-2021-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electronic service quality (e-SQ) measurement: a cross-functional review
PurposeAlthough comprehensive work has been conducted in several scholarly journals in electronic service quality (e-SQ) measurement, there has been no cross-functional review of these studies. The majority of the review studies focus on e-SQ assessment in the field of electronic retail. This paper explores and synthesizes e-SQ evaluation work across the various functional domains in the last two decades and maps critical methodological challenges. It further classifies the dimensions used by researchers in six broad categories for better comprehension.Design/methodology/approachTo analyze and appreciate past e-SQ measurement research, a content assessment of the 50 most relevant research papers from various functional domains drawn from prestigious repositories was undertaken.FindingsThe results indicate shortcomings noticed in methodological issues in the e-SQ measurement research like research approaches, data analysis procedures, sampling methods, generation and purification of items, validity and reliability assessment, and dimensionality analysis. It further reveals that though e-SQ is multi-dimensional and context-specific, dimensions like content/information quality, website design, ease of use/usability, efficiency, security/and privacy, responsiveness, reliability, customer service, trust and fulfillment have been consistently cited in the reviewed studies across the various functional domains.Originality/valueAn assessment of 50 publications over the past 2 decades identifies key areas of concern in the existing research on e-SQ measurement in various functional domains for scholars and professionals. This study also provides a unique categorization of e-SQ dimensions used in various functional domains and has the potential to guide future research.
期刊介绍:
In today''s competitive business and industrial environment, it is essential to have an academic journal offering the most current theoretical knowledge on quality and reliability to ensure that top management is fully conversant with new thinking, techniques and developments in the field. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (IJQRM) deals with all aspects of business improvements and with all aspects of manufacturing and services, from the training of (senior) managers, to innovations in organising and processing to raise standards of product and service quality. It is this unique blend of theoretical knowledge and managerial relevance that makes IJQRM a valuable resource for managers striving for higher standards.Coverage includes: -Reliability, availability & maintenance -Gauging, calibration & measurement -Life cycle costing & sustainability -Reliability Management of Systems -Service Quality -Green Marketing -Product liability -Product testing techniques & systems -Quality function deployment -Reliability & quality education & training -Productivity improvement -Performance improvement -(Regulatory) standards for quality & Quality Awards -Statistical process control -System modelling -Teamwork -Quality data & datamining