{"title":"《中世纪的皱纹:消除种族、时间性和早期英语的问题》","authors":"M. Rambaran-Olm","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2021.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The field of Early English studies (formerly Anglo-Saxon studies) is both founded on and operates within the parameters of white supremacy. Currently, the field is grappling with questions concerning who it represents, how it reflects on the world, and likewise the boundaries of the period. This analysis investigates the history of the field, surveys its periodization dates, and interrogates our diminished understanding of this time in early medieval history, due in part to the field's continued restrictiveness and insistence on preserving white heritage myths. While outlining the historiography of the field and the early English period, this paper also tackles the erasure or downplaying of Black historical figures and Black scholars in medieval studies. Primarily centering the works of Stuart Hall, Frantz Fanon, Toni Morrison, and a number of postcolonial theorists, this essay examines the field's restrictiveness, gatekeeping, and whiteness, which has fed into ethnonationalism and anti-Blackness. Ultimately, this piece explores the undercurrent of racism prevalent in Early English studies which continues to undermine its potential as a field to provide a deeper and more enriching understanding of the past.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"52 1","pages":"385 - 406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Wrinkle in Medieval Time: Ironing out Issues Regarding Race, Temporality, and the Early English\",\"authors\":\"M. Rambaran-Olm\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nlh.2021.0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The field of Early English studies (formerly Anglo-Saxon studies) is both founded on and operates within the parameters of white supremacy. Currently, the field is grappling with questions concerning who it represents, how it reflects on the world, and likewise the boundaries of the period. This analysis investigates the history of the field, surveys its periodization dates, and interrogates our diminished understanding of this time in early medieval history, due in part to the field's continued restrictiveness and insistence on preserving white heritage myths. While outlining the historiography of the field and the early English period, this paper also tackles the erasure or downplaying of Black historical figures and Black scholars in medieval studies. Primarily centering the works of Stuart Hall, Frantz Fanon, Toni Morrison, and a number of postcolonial theorists, this essay examines the field's restrictiveness, gatekeeping, and whiteness, which has fed into ethnonationalism and anti-Blackness. Ultimately, this piece explores the undercurrent of racism prevalent in Early English studies which continues to undermine its potential as a field to provide a deeper and more enriching understanding of the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Literary History\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"385 - 406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Literary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Wrinkle in Medieval Time: Ironing out Issues Regarding Race, Temporality, and the Early English
Abstract:The field of Early English studies (formerly Anglo-Saxon studies) is both founded on and operates within the parameters of white supremacy. Currently, the field is grappling with questions concerning who it represents, how it reflects on the world, and likewise the boundaries of the period. This analysis investigates the history of the field, surveys its periodization dates, and interrogates our diminished understanding of this time in early medieval history, due in part to the field's continued restrictiveness and insistence on preserving white heritage myths. While outlining the historiography of the field and the early English period, this paper also tackles the erasure or downplaying of Black historical figures and Black scholars in medieval studies. Primarily centering the works of Stuart Hall, Frantz Fanon, Toni Morrison, and a number of postcolonial theorists, this essay examines the field's restrictiveness, gatekeeping, and whiteness, which has fed into ethnonationalism and anti-Blackness. Ultimately, this piece explores the undercurrent of racism prevalent in Early English studies which continues to undermine its potential as a field to provide a deeper and more enriching understanding of the past.
期刊介绍:
New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.