后南斯拉夫背景下宗教间对话的复杂性

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-12 DOI:10.1080/19448953.2023.2167176
Vladimir Bakrač, M. Dokić, B. Radeljić
{"title":"后南斯拉夫背景下宗教间对话的复杂性","authors":"Vladimir Bakrač, M. Dokić, B. Radeljić","doi":"10.1080/19448953.2023.2167176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The post-Yugoslav context has experienced major instances of intolerance, suggesting that the success of initiatives dedicated to interreligious dialogue and lasting peaceful coexistence has been limited. While being aware of what is expected of them, political elites and religious leaders have approached each other as an asset useful to legitimize their rule, which has directly restrained prospects for a prejudice-free dialogue in the fragile societies. This article sees interreligious dialogue and tolerance as an imperative prerequisite for multiconfessional reconciliation in the area of the former Yugoslavia, so that religion is not used as a means for social and political agendas. Accordingly, religious dialogue and debates concerning tolerance should be treated as a sort of incomplete conversation, which should also welcome contributions from a wide range of civic actors in charge of monitoring pursued processes.","PeriodicalId":45789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"811 - 831"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexities of Interreligious Dialogue in the Post-Yugoslav Context\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Bakrač, M. Dokić, B. Radeljić\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19448953.2023.2167176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The post-Yugoslav context has experienced major instances of intolerance, suggesting that the success of initiatives dedicated to interreligious dialogue and lasting peaceful coexistence has been limited. While being aware of what is expected of them, political elites and religious leaders have approached each other as an asset useful to legitimize their rule, which has directly restrained prospects for a prejudice-free dialogue in the fragile societies. This article sees interreligious dialogue and tolerance as an imperative prerequisite for multiconfessional reconciliation in the area of the former Yugoslavia, so that religion is not used as a means for social and political agendas. Accordingly, religious dialogue and debates concerning tolerance should be treated as a sort of incomplete conversation, which should also welcome contributions from a wide range of civic actors in charge of monitoring pursued processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"811 - 831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2023.2167176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要后南斯拉夫的环境经历了重大的不容忍事件,这表明致力于宗教间对话和持久和平共处的举措的成功是有限的。政治精英和宗教领袖在意识到人们对他们的期望的同时,将彼此视为有助于使其统治合法化的资产,这直接制约了在脆弱社会中进行无偏见对话的前景。这篇文章认为,宗教间对话和宽容是前南斯拉夫地区多专业和解的必要先决条件,这样宗教就不会被用作社会和政治议程的手段。因此,宗教对话和关于宽容的辩论应被视为一种不完整的对话,这也应欢迎负责监督所追求的进程的广泛民间行为者的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexities of Interreligious Dialogue in the Post-Yugoslav Context
ABSTRACT The post-Yugoslav context has experienced major instances of intolerance, suggesting that the success of initiatives dedicated to interreligious dialogue and lasting peaceful coexistence has been limited. While being aware of what is expected of them, political elites and religious leaders have approached each other as an asset useful to legitimize their rule, which has directly restrained prospects for a prejudice-free dialogue in the fragile societies. This article sees interreligious dialogue and tolerance as an imperative prerequisite for multiconfessional reconciliation in the area of the former Yugoslavia, so that religion is not used as a means for social and political agendas. Accordingly, religious dialogue and debates concerning tolerance should be treated as a sort of incomplete conversation, which should also welcome contributions from a wide range of civic actors in charge of monitoring pursued processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
2023 Elections in Turkey within Global Context: Right Wing Populism in the Era of Global Shift Turkish Humanitarian Assistance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Focus on Africa Summitry Diplomacy in Turkey–Africa Relations: Statements, (Non-)Accomplishments and Effectiveness Turkey-Africa Relations and Turkey’s National Role Conception as the Centre Country: Continuity or a Break with the Past? Autonomy and Control in the Gig Economy and Platform Work: Domestic and Home Repair Workers in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1