在澳大利亚一家医院制定单位剂量方法管理口服阿片类液体

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1002/jppr.1861
Lewis Bint BPharm, MBA, Matthew Rawlins BPharm, MBA, Ashleigh Lawrence BPharm, Hons, Ken Tam BPharm, Barry Jenkins BPharm
{"title":"在澳大利亚一家医院制定单位剂量方法管理口服阿片类液体","authors":"Lewis Bint BPharm, MBA,&nbsp;Matthew Rawlins BPharm, MBA,&nbsp;Ashleigh Lawrence BPharm, Hons,&nbsp;Ken Tam BPharm,&nbsp;Barry Jenkins BPharm","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Liquid opioids (controlled drugs) in multidose bottles (MDBs) are associated with measurement losses, overfill variance, gradual contamination, and potential theft. Western Australian state poisons regulations and policies require rigorous accountability and previous reports have highlighted shortcomings in historical arrangements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the process and outcomes of a transition to unit dose pod (UDP) formulations for oral liquid opioids at our institution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A UDP of oral oxycodone liquid was developed in partnership with a third-party compounder and piloted on a paediatric ward. Additional UDP opioid formulations were developed and gradually replaced MDBs across our institution. Reportable discrepancies and staff satisfaction were compared between MDBs and UDPs. This project was registered as a quality improvement project (GEKO 27758) and considered exempt from human research and ethics approval by the South Metropolitan Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between May 2017 and May 2018, 3062 UDPs were distributed with nil discrepancies, and 133 MDBs were distributed with 16 discrepancies (0% vs 12%). Most staff (92%) reported more efficient inventory counts and improved confidence in product integrity for UDPs. Staff administrative overhead required to manage reportable discrepancies from volume errors was essentially eliminated. Five UDP opioid formulations were implemented in 27 inpatient wards including methadone-maintenance UDPs for inpatient use. By late 2020, UDPs were in use across 19 hospitals in Western Australia (WA), with annual use exceeding 33 000 units.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The UDP simplifies the management of controlled drug liquids by eliminating discrepancies associated with MDBs inventory management and increasing staff confidence in product quality, leading to significant uptake across WA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 3","pages":"135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a unit dose approach to managing oral opioid liquids in an Australian hospital\",\"authors\":\"Lewis Bint BPharm, MBA,&nbsp;Matthew Rawlins BPharm, MBA,&nbsp;Ashleigh Lawrence BPharm, Hons,&nbsp;Ken Tam BPharm,&nbsp;Barry Jenkins BPharm\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Liquid opioids (controlled drugs) in multidose bottles (MDBs) are associated with measurement losses, overfill variance, gradual contamination, and potential theft. Western Australian state poisons regulations and policies require rigorous accountability and previous reports have highlighted shortcomings in historical arrangements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To describe the process and outcomes of a transition to unit dose pod (UDP) formulations for oral liquid opioids at our institution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A UDP of oral oxycodone liquid was developed in partnership with a third-party compounder and piloted on a paediatric ward. Additional UDP opioid formulations were developed and gradually replaced MDBs across our institution. Reportable discrepancies and staff satisfaction were compared between MDBs and UDPs. This project was registered as a quality improvement project (GEKO 27758) and considered exempt from human research and ethics approval by the South Metropolitan Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between May 2017 and May 2018, 3062 UDPs were distributed with nil discrepancies, and 133 MDBs were distributed with 16 discrepancies (0% vs 12%). Most staff (92%) reported more efficient inventory counts and improved confidence in product integrity for UDPs. Staff administrative overhead required to manage reportable discrepancies from volume errors was essentially eliminated. Five UDP opioid formulations were implemented in 27 inpatient wards including methadone-maintenance UDPs for inpatient use. By late 2020, UDPs were in use across 19 hospitals in Western Australia (WA), with annual use exceeding 33 000 units.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The UDP simplifies the management of controlled drug liquids by eliminating discrepancies associated with MDBs inventory management and increasing staff confidence in product quality, leading to significant uptake across WA.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"135-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多剂量瓶(MDB)中的液体阿片类药物(受控药物)与测量损失、过量填充变化、逐渐污染和潜在盗窃有关。西澳大利亚州的毒物法规和政策需要严格的问责制,之前的报告强调了历史安排中的缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a unit dose approach to managing oral opioid liquids in an Australian hospital

Background

Liquid opioids (controlled drugs) in multidose bottles (MDBs) are associated with measurement losses, overfill variance, gradual contamination, and potential theft. Western Australian state poisons regulations and policies require rigorous accountability and previous reports have highlighted shortcomings in historical arrangements.

Aim

To describe the process and outcomes of a transition to unit dose pod (UDP) formulations for oral liquid opioids at our institution.

Method

A UDP of oral oxycodone liquid was developed in partnership with a third-party compounder and piloted on a paediatric ward. Additional UDP opioid formulations were developed and gradually replaced MDBs across our institution. Reportable discrepancies and staff satisfaction were compared between MDBs and UDPs. This project was registered as a quality improvement project (GEKO 27758) and considered exempt from human research and ethics approval by the South Metropolitan Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee.

Results

Between May 2017 and May 2018, 3062 UDPs were distributed with nil discrepancies, and 133 MDBs were distributed with 16 discrepancies (0% vs 12%). Most staff (92%) reported more efficient inventory counts and improved confidence in product integrity for UDPs. Staff administrative overhead required to manage reportable discrepancies from volume errors was essentially eliminated. Five UDP opioid formulations were implemented in 27 inpatient wards including methadone-maintenance UDPs for inpatient use. By late 2020, UDPs were in use across 19 hospitals in Western Australia (WA), with annual use exceeding 33 000 units.

Conclusion

The UDP simplifies the management of controlled drug liquids by eliminating discrepancies associated with MDBs inventory management and increasing staff confidence in product quality, leading to significant uptake across WA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Standard of practice for pharmacy services specialising in transitions of care Active Ingredient Prescribing in Australia: exploring pharmacists' experiences A surgical preadmission pharmacist service in a tertiary paediatric hospital: a pilot study The pharmacologic management of status epilepticus in pregnant patients: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1