心肌血运重建术后心力衰竭和左室射血分数降低患者服用SGLT2抑制剂的临床预后

M. Kucheriava, Georgy B. Mankovsky, N. Rudenko
{"title":"心肌血运重建术后心力衰竭和左室射血分数降低患者服用SGLT2抑制剂的临床预后","authors":"M. Kucheriava, Georgy B. Mankovsky, N. Rudenko","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(02)/km020-5158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To evaluate clinical and prognostic effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on primary (progression of heart failure, rehospitalization) and secondary endpoints (death from cardiovascular disease and from all causes) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). \nMaterials and methods. In a one-center study on the basis of the Ukrainian Children’s Cardiac Center, Clinic for Adults we analyzed the data for drug and interventional treatment of 166 patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%), who underwent PCI in the last 8 months. Among the 166 patients studied, 86 (51.8%) patients received SGLT2 inhibitors as an adjunct to the standard baseline therapy, and 80 (48.2%) patients did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors after PCI. \nResults and discussion. The primary combined outcome was observed in 10 patients (6.02%) in the group of patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors and 35 patients (21.08%) without addition of SGLT2 inhibitors (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.85; p <0.001). The incidence of the secondary combined result was lower in the group receiving SGLT2 inhibitors than in the comparison group (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; p <0.001). \nConclusions. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to the standard therapу provided a 72% reduction in the relative risk, estimated by the incidence of primary combined endpoint in particular, hospitalization due to the heart failure decompensation by 34% in the same group, and the secondary endpoint by 50%. The advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors over the standard therapy in the effect on the primary endpoint did not depend on the complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization by PCI in patients over an 8-month follow-up period. SGLT2 inhibitors use in patients after PCI with reduced left ventricular systolic function over the 8-month follow-up period led to regression of angina according to the KCCQ-TSS questionnaire, decreased functional class according to the New York classification, and increased LVEF.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Myocardial Revascularization on the Background of Taking SGLT2 Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"M. Kucheriava, Georgy B. Mankovsky, N. Rudenko\",\"doi\":\"10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(02)/km020-5158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim. To evaluate clinical and prognostic effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on primary (progression of heart failure, rehospitalization) and secondary endpoints (death from cardiovascular disease and from all causes) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). \\nMaterials and methods. In a one-center study on the basis of the Ukrainian Children’s Cardiac Center, Clinic for Adults we analyzed the data for drug and interventional treatment of 166 patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%), who underwent PCI in the last 8 months. Among the 166 patients studied, 86 (51.8%) patients received SGLT2 inhibitors as an adjunct to the standard baseline therapy, and 80 (48.2%) patients did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors after PCI. \\nResults and discussion. The primary combined outcome was observed in 10 patients (6.02%) in the group of patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors and 35 patients (21.08%) without addition of SGLT2 inhibitors (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.85; p <0.001). The incidence of the secondary combined result was lower in the group receiving SGLT2 inhibitors than in the comparison group (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; p <0.001). \\nConclusions. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to the standard therapу provided a 72% reduction in the relative risk, estimated by the incidence of primary combined endpoint in particular, hospitalization due to the heart failure decompensation by 34% in the same group, and the secondary endpoint by 50%. The advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors over the standard therapy in the effect on the primary endpoint did not depend on the complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization by PCI in patients over an 8-month follow-up period. SGLT2 inhibitors use in patients after PCI with reduced left ventricular systolic function over the 8-month follow-up period led to regression of angina according to the KCCQ-TSS questionnaire, decreased functional class according to the New York classification, and increased LVEF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(02)/km020-5158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/22.30(02)/km020-5158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。评估钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后8个月内射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的主要终点(心力衰竭进展、再次住院)和次要终点(心血管疾病和各种原因导致的死亡)的临床和预后影响。材料和方法。在乌克兰儿童心脏中心成人诊所的一项单中心研究中,我们分析了166名在过去8个月内接受PCI治疗的冠状动脉疾病和左心室射血分数降低(LVEF)(<40%)患者的药物和介入治疗数据。在研究的166名患者中,86名(51.8%)患者接受了SGLT2抑制剂作为标准基线治疗的辅助治疗,80名(48.2%)患者在PCI后没有接受SGLT2药物治疗。结果和讨论。在服用SGLT2抑制剂的患者组中观察到10名患者(6.02%)和未添加SGLT2抑制物的35名患者(21.08%)的主要联合结果(危险比0.72;95%置信区间,0.65-0.85;p<0.001)。接受SGLT2抑制剂的患者组的次要联合结果发生率低于对照组(危险比0.85;95%可信区间,0.75-0.95;p<001)。结论。除标准治疗外,SGLT2抑制剂的使用使相对风险降低了72%,特别是根据主要联合终点的发生率估计,同一组因心力衰竭失代偿而住院的风险降低了34%,次要终点降低了50%。SGLT2抑制剂在主要终点的效果上优于标准治疗,这并不取决于患者在8个月的随访期内通过PCI进行的完全或不完全的心肌血运重建。根据KCCQ-TSS问卷,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室收缩功能下降的患者在8个月的随访期内使用SGLT2抑制剂可导致心绞痛消退,根据纽约分类,功能分级降低,LVEF增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Myocardial Revascularization on the Background of Taking SGLT2 Inhibitors
The aim. To evaluate clinical and prognostic effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on primary (progression of heart failure, rehospitalization) and secondary endpoints (death from cardiovascular disease and from all causes) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) within 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and methods. In a one-center study on the basis of the Ukrainian Children’s Cardiac Center, Clinic for Adults we analyzed the data for drug and interventional treatment of 166 patients with coronary artery disease and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%), who underwent PCI in the last 8 months. Among the 166 patients studied, 86 (51.8%) patients received SGLT2 inhibitors as an adjunct to the standard baseline therapy, and 80 (48.2%) patients did not receive SGLT2 inhibitors after PCI. Results and discussion. The primary combined outcome was observed in 10 patients (6.02%) in the group of patients taking SGLT2 inhibitors and 35 patients (21.08%) without addition of SGLT2 inhibitors (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.85; p <0.001). The incidence of the secondary combined result was lower in the group receiving SGLT2 inhibitors than in the comparison group (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; p <0.001). Conclusions. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to the standard therapу provided a 72% reduction in the relative risk, estimated by the incidence of primary combined endpoint in particular, hospitalization due to the heart failure decompensation by 34% in the same group, and the secondary endpoint by 50%. The advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors over the standard therapy in the effect on the primary endpoint did not depend on the complete or incomplete myocardial revascularization by PCI in patients over an 8-month follow-up period. SGLT2 inhibitors use in patients after PCI with reduced left ventricular systolic function over the 8-month follow-up period led to regression of angina according to the KCCQ-TSS questionnaire, decreased functional class according to the New York classification, and increased LVEF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Non-Invasive Lung Ventilation Support in Newborns and Young Children after Cardiac Surgery Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm Features of Catheter Treatment of Non-Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Issues of Organization of the Cardiac Surgical Care in Ukraine under Martial Law Hemostasiological Aspects of PCI: Periprocedural Changes in the Activity of the Platelet Link of Hemocoagulation on the Background of Prior Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1