用模糊层次分析法绘制爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹市洪水易感性图

Beyza Atiye Cikmaz, Enes Yildirim, I. Demir
{"title":"用模糊层次分析法绘制爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹市洪水易感性图","authors":"Beyza Atiye Cikmaz, Enes Yildirim, I. Demir","doi":"10.1080/15715124.2023.2216936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Floods affect over 2.2 billion people worldwide, and their frequency is increasing at an alarming rate compared to other natural disasters. Presidential disaster declarations have issued increasingly almost every year in Iowa for the past 30 years, indicating that the state is on the rise of flood risk. While significant scientific and technological advancement is becoming available for many flood mitigation activities, their on-the-ground consequences are hampered, among other things, by the lack of tools to quickly integrate the growing data into accessible and usable flood mitigation decisions. A multi-disciplinary approach is required, in which the underlying hydrologic processes that cause floods are closely linked with watershed-level socio-economic functions using effective collaboration tools to ensure community participation in the co-production of mitigation plans while paying attention to socio-environmental justice principles. Considering the existing limitations and needs, we conducted a flood risk assessment by utilizing geophysical and socio-economic datasets for a case study in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Flood risk outputs are generated based on three main risk groups: geophysical-based flood risk, socioeconomic risk, and combined flood risk. Our results indicate that high- and very-high-risk flood susceptibility zones are primarily located in central urban areas with lower elevations. According to overall results, a large area of Cedar Rapids consists of a medium risk level according to the flood risk map combined with the fuzzy AHP method. The results show that high and very high-risk areas are 16% of the examined area, medium, low and very low-risk areas correspond to 84%. Besides, nearly 40% of the population lives in high to very high flood risk zones.","PeriodicalId":14344,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of River Basin Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood Susceptibility Mapping using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Cedar Rapids, Iowa\",\"authors\":\"Beyza Atiye Cikmaz, Enes Yildirim, I. Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15715124.2023.2216936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Floods affect over 2.2 billion people worldwide, and their frequency is increasing at an alarming rate compared to other natural disasters. Presidential disaster declarations have issued increasingly almost every year in Iowa for the past 30 years, indicating that the state is on the rise of flood risk. While significant scientific and technological advancement is becoming available for many flood mitigation activities, their on-the-ground consequences are hampered, among other things, by the lack of tools to quickly integrate the growing data into accessible and usable flood mitigation decisions. A multi-disciplinary approach is required, in which the underlying hydrologic processes that cause floods are closely linked with watershed-level socio-economic functions using effective collaboration tools to ensure community participation in the co-production of mitigation plans while paying attention to socio-environmental justice principles. Considering the existing limitations and needs, we conducted a flood risk assessment by utilizing geophysical and socio-economic datasets for a case study in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Flood risk outputs are generated based on three main risk groups: geophysical-based flood risk, socioeconomic risk, and combined flood risk. Our results indicate that high- and very-high-risk flood susceptibility zones are primarily located in central urban areas with lower elevations. According to overall results, a large area of Cedar Rapids consists of a medium risk level according to the flood risk map combined with the fuzzy AHP method. The results show that high and very high-risk areas are 16% of the examined area, medium, low and very low-risk areas correspond to 84%. Besides, nearly 40% of the population lives in high to very high flood risk zones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of River Basin Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of River Basin Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2216936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of River Basin Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2216936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

洪水影响着全世界超过22亿人,与其他自然灾害相比,洪水的频率正在以惊人的速度增加。在过去的30年里,爱荷华州几乎每年都会发布越来越多的总统灾难宣言,这表明该州的洪水风险正在上升。尽管许多防洪活动正在取得重大的科学和技术进步,但由于缺乏将不断增长的数据快速整合到可访问和可用的防洪决策中的工具,这些活动的实地后果受到了阻碍。需要一种多学科的方法,其中导致洪水的基本水文过程与流域层面的社会经济功能密切相关,使用有效的合作工具确保社区参与共同制定缓解计划,同时注意社会环境正义原则。考虑到现有的局限性和需求,我们利用地球物理和社会经济数据集在爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹进行了洪水风险评估。洪水风险输出基于三个主要风险组:基于地球物理的洪水风险、社会经济风险和综合洪水风险。我们的研究结果表明,高风险和极高风险的洪水易发区主要位于海拔较低的中心城区。根据总体结果,根据洪水风险图和模糊AHP方法,锡达拉皮兹大面积地区属于中等风险等级。结果显示,高风险和非常高风险地区占检查地区的16%,中风险、低风险和非常低风险地区占84%。此外,近40%的人口生活在高到极高的洪水风险区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flood Susceptibility Mapping using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Floods affect over 2.2 billion people worldwide, and their frequency is increasing at an alarming rate compared to other natural disasters. Presidential disaster declarations have issued increasingly almost every year in Iowa for the past 30 years, indicating that the state is on the rise of flood risk. While significant scientific and technological advancement is becoming available for many flood mitigation activities, their on-the-ground consequences are hampered, among other things, by the lack of tools to quickly integrate the growing data into accessible and usable flood mitigation decisions. A multi-disciplinary approach is required, in which the underlying hydrologic processes that cause floods are closely linked with watershed-level socio-economic functions using effective collaboration tools to ensure community participation in the co-production of mitigation plans while paying attention to socio-environmental justice principles. Considering the existing limitations and needs, we conducted a flood risk assessment by utilizing geophysical and socio-economic datasets for a case study in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Flood risk outputs are generated based on three main risk groups: geophysical-based flood risk, socioeconomic risk, and combined flood risk. Our results indicate that high- and very-high-risk flood susceptibility zones are primarily located in central urban areas with lower elevations. According to overall results, a large area of Cedar Rapids consists of a medium risk level according to the flood risk map combined with the fuzzy AHP method. The results show that high and very high-risk areas are 16% of the examined area, medium, low and very low-risk areas correspond to 84%. Besides, nearly 40% of the population lives in high to very high flood risk zones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: include, but are not limited to new developments or applications in the following areas: AREAS OF INTEREST - integrated water resources management - watershed land use planning and management - spatial planning and management of floodplains - flood forecasting and flood risk management - drought forecasting and drought management - floodplain, river and estuarine restoration - climate change impact prediction and planning of remedial measures - management of mountain rivers - water quality management including non point source pollution - operation strategies for engineered river systems - maintenance strategies for river systems and for structures - project-affected-people and stakeholder participation - conservation of natural and cultural heritage
期刊最新文献
The Rise of Counter Hydro-Hegemony and the Deconstruction of Old Narratives in the Eastern Nile Basin A Comparison of Eulerian and Semi-Lagrangian Approaches for Modeling Stream Water Quality People beyond the Border in the Sandbars of Damodar River: Understanding the People’s Management in a Changing Landscape, India Occurrence, toxicity load, pollution index and health risk assessment of trace elements in drinking water of two catchments in North-western Himalayas. Floods in Dinaric Karst fields: a case study of the Dicmanjsko-Bisko Polje (Croatia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1