掌侧锁定钢板外固定与K线在关节镜辅助桡骨远端关节内骨折内固定中的比较

Uldis Krustiņš, J. Krustiņš, Diāna Bringina, Kristine Laurane, A. Jumtins
{"title":"掌侧锁定钢板外固定与K线在关节镜辅助桡骨远端关节内骨折内固定中的比较","authors":"Uldis Krustiņš, J. Krustiņš, Diāna Bringina, Kristine Laurane, A. Jumtins","doi":"10.1177/1753193419879567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of a prospective cohort study that included 63 patients with intra-articular (AO Type C) distal radial fractures who were treated using an arthroscopically assisted approach with either volar locking plates or external fixator and K-wires. Postoperative analysis was carried out using X-ray assessment, clinical data, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, Gartland and Werley score, Modern Activity Subjective Survey of 2007 score, range of motion, grip, pinch and tripod pinch assessment at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Despite the statistically significant differences found in a number of parameters during the period of observation, there were no clinically relevant differences determined between the two methods. There was a greater number of complications in the external fixator and K-wire treated patients. Level of evidence: II","PeriodicalId":73762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419879567","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of volar locking plates with external fixation and K-wires in arthroscopically assisted intra-articular distal radial fracture fixation\",\"authors\":\"Uldis Krustiņš, J. Krustiņš, Diāna Bringina, Kristine Laurane, A. Jumtins\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753193419879567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the results of a prospective cohort study that included 63 patients with intra-articular (AO Type C) distal radial fractures who were treated using an arthroscopically assisted approach with either volar locking plates or external fixator and K-wires. Postoperative analysis was carried out using X-ray assessment, clinical data, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, Gartland and Werley score, Modern Activity Subjective Survey of 2007 score, range of motion, grip, pinch and tripod pinch assessment at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Despite the statistically significant differences found in a number of parameters during the period of observation, there were no clinically relevant differences determined between the two methods. There was a greater number of complications in the external fixator and K-wire treated patients. Level of evidence: II\",\"PeriodicalId\":73762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419879567\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419879567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419879567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

这篇文章介绍了一项前瞻性队列研究的结果,该研究包括63名关节内(AO C型)桡骨远端骨折患者,他们使用关节镜辅助方法,使用掌侧锁定板或外固定器和K线进行治疗。术后分析使用X射线评估、临床数据、患者评分腕关节评估评分、Gartland和Werley评分、2007年现代活动主观调查评分、1、3、6和12岁时的活动范围、握力、握力和三脚架握力评估 术后数月。尽管在观察期间发现许多参数存在统计学上的显著差异,但两种方法之间没有确定临床相关的差异。外固定器和K线治疗的患者有更多的并发症。证据级别:二
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of volar locking plates with external fixation and K-wires in arthroscopically assisted intra-articular distal radial fracture fixation
This article presents the results of a prospective cohort study that included 63 patients with intra-articular (AO Type C) distal radial fractures who were treated using an arthroscopically assisted approach with either volar locking plates or external fixator and K-wires. Postoperative analysis was carried out using X-ray assessment, clinical data, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, Gartland and Werley score, Modern Activity Subjective Survey of 2007 score, range of motion, grip, pinch and tripod pinch assessment at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Despite the statistically significant differences found in a number of parameters during the period of observation, there were no clinically relevant differences determined between the two methods. There was a greater number of complications in the external fixator and K-wire treated patients. Level of evidence: II
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poland syndrome: a new classification system based on a retrospective analysis of 74 cases Management of conflict injuries to the upper limb. Part 2: reconstruction and managing complications Medium-term clinical outcomes of Zone 2B/2C finger flexor tendon repairs: influence of management of flexor digitorum superficialis Changes in tendon length and excursion following extensor tendon grafting at the distal radioulnar joint Abductor pollicis brevis rerouting and first web deepening for clasped thumb deformity in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1