{"title":"新加坡同性恋非刑事化:世俗主义和选举实用主义视角下的政治回应","authors":"A. Yu, Stephanie Kwan Nga Lam","doi":"10.1080/00358533.2023.2202948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Singapore’s Section 377A criminalises sex between men, making it punishable by up to two years in prison. Over the years, there have been calls to repeal the law and decriminalise homosexuality, citing human rights, access to health care and social support. However, opponents argue that it goes against traditional and religious values and would lead to a breakdown of social order. The article explores the issue of, and the political responses to, decriminalising homosexuality from the perspective of secularism and electoral pragmatism and the implications of decriminalisation for the country’s future.","PeriodicalId":35685,"journal":{"name":"Round Table","volume":"112 1","pages":"163 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decriminalising homosexuality in Singapore: political responses from the perspective of secularism and electoral pragmatism\",\"authors\":\"A. Yu, Stephanie Kwan Nga Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00358533.2023.2202948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Singapore’s Section 377A criminalises sex between men, making it punishable by up to two years in prison. Over the years, there have been calls to repeal the law and decriminalise homosexuality, citing human rights, access to health care and social support. However, opponents argue that it goes against traditional and religious values and would lead to a breakdown of social order. The article explores the issue of, and the political responses to, decriminalising homosexuality from the perspective of secularism and electoral pragmatism and the implications of decriminalisation for the country’s future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Round Table\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"163 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Round Table\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2202948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Round Table","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2202948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decriminalising homosexuality in Singapore: political responses from the perspective of secularism and electoral pragmatism
ABSTRACT Singapore’s Section 377A criminalises sex between men, making it punishable by up to two years in prison. Over the years, there have been calls to repeal the law and decriminalise homosexuality, citing human rights, access to health care and social support. However, opponents argue that it goes against traditional and religious values and would lead to a breakdown of social order. The article explores the issue of, and the political responses to, decriminalising homosexuality from the perspective of secularism and electoral pragmatism and the implications of decriminalisation for the country’s future.
Round TableSocial Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1910, The Round Table, Britain"s oldest international affairs journal, provides analysis and commentary on all aspects of international affairs. The journal is the major source for coverage of policy issues concerning the contemporary Commonwealth and its role in international affairs, with occasional articles on themes of historical interest. The Round Table has for many years been a repository of informed scholarship, opinion, and judgement regarding both international relations in general, and the Commonwealth in particular, with authorship and readership drawn from the worlds of government, business, finance and academe.