人工智能在语言学习中的研究趋势——基于活动理论的系统实证文献综述

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.14742/ajet.7492
Hongzhi Yang, Suna Kyun
{"title":"人工智能在语言学习中的研究趋势——基于活动理论的系统实证文献综述","authors":"Hongzhi Yang, Suna Kyun","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed, there has been little research to review, describe, and analyse the trends and development of empirical research on AI-supported language learning. This paper selected and analysed 25 empirical research papers on AI-supported language learning published in the last 15 years. These empirical studies were analysed using the activity theory from seven constituents: tool, subject, object, rules, community, division of labour, and outcome. A key contribution of this paper is the use of activity theory to illustrate the dynamic interactions and contradictions between the seven elements. AI-supported technology as a mediating tool demonstrated some effectiveness in language learning but needs further improvement in the use of language for communication and collaborative design. We argue that teachers’ intervention and configuration of AI-supported language learning in the pedagogical design plays an important role in the effectiveness of learning. More research is needed to explore the use of AI-supported language learning in the classroom or the real-life learning context.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nResearch on AI-supported language learning should view teacher and students as active agents in interacting with technology and making transformations in real life learning situations.\nMore research should focus on productive dialogue and communication in AI-supported language learning with collaborative design.\nA mixed module of AI-supported language learning and formal teacher instruction should be incorporated in pedagogical design.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hongzhi Yang, Suna Kyun\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.7492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed, there has been little research to review, describe, and analyse the trends and development of empirical research on AI-supported language learning. This paper selected and analysed 25 empirical research papers on AI-supported language learning published in the last 15 years. These empirical studies were analysed using the activity theory from seven constituents: tool, subject, object, rules, community, division of labour, and outcome. A key contribution of this paper is the use of activity theory to illustrate the dynamic interactions and contradictions between the seven elements. AI-supported technology as a mediating tool demonstrated some effectiveness in language learning but needs further improvement in the use of language for communication and collaborative design. We argue that teachers’ intervention and configuration of AI-supported language learning in the pedagogical design plays an important role in the effectiveness of learning. More research is needed to explore the use of AI-supported language learning in the classroom or the real-life learning context.\\nImplications for practice or policy:\\n\\nResearch on AI-supported language learning should view teacher and students as active agents in interacting with technology and making transformations in real life learning situations.\\nMore research should focus on productive dialogue and communication in AI-supported language learning with collaborative design.\\nA mixed module of AI-supported language learning and formal teacher instruction should be incorporated in pedagogical design.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管人工智能领域发展迅速,但很少有研究回顾、描述和分析人工智能支持的语言学习实证研究的趋势和发展。本文选取并分析了过去15年中发表的25篇关于人工智能支持的语言学习的实证研究论文。这些实证研究是使用活动理论从七个组成部分进行分析的:工具、主体、对象、规则、社区、分工和结果。本文的一个重要贡献是使用活动理论来说明七要素之间的动态互动和矛盾。人工智能支持的技术作为一种中介工具在语言学习中表现出了一定的有效性,但在沟通和协作设计中使用语言方面需要进一步改进。我们认为,教师在教学设计中对人工智能支持的语言学习的干预和配置对学习的有效性起着重要作用。需要更多的研究来探索在课堂或现实生活中使用人工智能支持的语言学习。对实践或政策的影响:人工智能支持的语言学习研究应将教师和学生视为与技术互动和在现实生活学习环境中进行变革的积极参与者。更多的研究应该集中在人工智能支持的语言学习与协作设计中的富有成效的对话和交流上。人工智能支持的语言学习和正式教师教学的混合模块应纳入教学设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The current research trend of artificial intelligence in language learning: A systematic empirical literature review from an activity theory perspective
Although the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly developed, there has been little research to review, describe, and analyse the trends and development of empirical research on AI-supported language learning. This paper selected and analysed 25 empirical research papers on AI-supported language learning published in the last 15 years. These empirical studies were analysed using the activity theory from seven constituents: tool, subject, object, rules, community, division of labour, and outcome. A key contribution of this paper is the use of activity theory to illustrate the dynamic interactions and contradictions between the seven elements. AI-supported technology as a mediating tool demonstrated some effectiveness in language learning but needs further improvement in the use of language for communication and collaborative design. We argue that teachers’ intervention and configuration of AI-supported language learning in the pedagogical design plays an important role in the effectiveness of learning. More research is needed to explore the use of AI-supported language learning in the classroom or the real-life learning context. Implications for practice or policy: Research on AI-supported language learning should view teacher and students as active agents in interacting with technology and making transformations in real life learning situations. More research should focus on productive dialogue and communication in AI-supported language learning with collaborative design. A mixed module of AI-supported language learning and formal teacher instruction should be incorporated in pedagogical design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to sustain a centralised approach to learning design Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education Access and Participation: The use of Technologies as tools for Inclusion by Spanish University Lecturers The effects of visualisation literacy and data storytelling dashboards on teachers’ cognitive load Students got mail: Do students read semi-tailored emails and what is the impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1