拓宽和深化印度洋研究

Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/19480881.2021.1993660
S. Chaturvedi
{"title":"拓宽和深化印度洋研究","authors":"S. Chaturvedi","doi":"10.1080/19480881.2021.1993660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This edition of the Journal of the Indian Ocean Region (JIOR) bears testimony to the ongoing broadening and deepening of Indian Ocean studies by critically informed interventions on inter-disciplinary intersections. The scholarly literature on indigenous peoples and their role in marine and fisheries development, coastal ecosystems, marine governance, and management has seen a welcome surge (Loch & Riechers, 2021; Parsons, Taylor, & Crease, 2021). This body of research emphasizes the importance of indigenous traditions and knowledge systems in ecologically sustainable, culturally sensitive, and socially inclusive development. It also pluralizes the ontology of Indian Ocean Region research and scholarship, granting greater salience to the subliminal ‘small scale’ at which coastal communities and local stakeholders operate, while exposing the limitations of the state-centric approach to the governance and management of fast multiplying human uses –and abuses– of maritime space and resources. Such perspectives from below relentlessly interrogate politics behind the production of geographical knowledge of maritime security and sustainability. They invite both academic and policy attention to the profound and far-reaching ethical and geopolitical implications of privileging a particular space-place, scale, and knowledge-power claim in universalizing narratives of Blue Economy and ocean governance at the cost of acknowledging the diverse worldviews, perspectives and priorities of different stakeholders. The current edition of JIOR opens with a thought-provoking article by Rosabelle Boswell and Jessica Leigh Thornton, which highlights the importance of knowledge pluralism in ocean governance and makes a persuasive case for including the perspectives, experiences, and world views of indigenous Khoisan people into the mainstream Blue Economy narratives in South Africa. Their key argument is that a holistic, integrated, and inclusive pursuit of Blue Economy demands and deserves a critical rethinking of the place of First Peoples and indigenous knowledge systems not only by South Africa but also in global ocean management regimes. We look forward to receiving more such submissions to JIOR, focusing on case studies from diverse sub-regions of the Indian Ocean region. The article by Somen Banerjee focuses on the emergence of the ‘Horn of Africa as a ‘Strategic Pivot of the Indian Ocean Region’ and builds a strong case for India to ‘repackage’ its vision and policy under the rubric of ‘Security and Growth for All’ (SAGAR) in pursuit of realising its ‘grand strategic’ vision of being a net security provider in the region. Revisiting its orientation towards the region also becomes a necessity considering recent developments and realignments in the Indo-Pacific theatre, especially the Aukus","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broadening and Deepening the Indian Ocean Studies\",\"authors\":\"S. Chaturvedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19480881.2021.1993660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This edition of the Journal of the Indian Ocean Region (JIOR) bears testimony to the ongoing broadening and deepening of Indian Ocean studies by critically informed interventions on inter-disciplinary intersections. The scholarly literature on indigenous peoples and their role in marine and fisheries development, coastal ecosystems, marine governance, and management has seen a welcome surge (Loch & Riechers, 2021; Parsons, Taylor, & Crease, 2021). This body of research emphasizes the importance of indigenous traditions and knowledge systems in ecologically sustainable, culturally sensitive, and socially inclusive development. It also pluralizes the ontology of Indian Ocean Region research and scholarship, granting greater salience to the subliminal ‘small scale’ at which coastal communities and local stakeholders operate, while exposing the limitations of the state-centric approach to the governance and management of fast multiplying human uses –and abuses– of maritime space and resources. Such perspectives from below relentlessly interrogate politics behind the production of geographical knowledge of maritime security and sustainability. They invite both academic and policy attention to the profound and far-reaching ethical and geopolitical implications of privileging a particular space-place, scale, and knowledge-power claim in universalizing narratives of Blue Economy and ocean governance at the cost of acknowledging the diverse worldviews, perspectives and priorities of different stakeholders. The current edition of JIOR opens with a thought-provoking article by Rosabelle Boswell and Jessica Leigh Thornton, which highlights the importance of knowledge pluralism in ocean governance and makes a persuasive case for including the perspectives, experiences, and world views of indigenous Khoisan people into the mainstream Blue Economy narratives in South Africa. Their key argument is that a holistic, integrated, and inclusive pursuit of Blue Economy demands and deserves a critical rethinking of the place of First Peoples and indigenous knowledge systems not only by South Africa but also in global ocean management regimes. We look forward to receiving more such submissions to JIOR, focusing on case studies from diverse sub-regions of the Indian Ocean region. The article by Somen Banerjee focuses on the emergence of the ‘Horn of Africa as a ‘Strategic Pivot of the Indian Ocean Region’ and builds a strong case for India to ‘repackage’ its vision and policy under the rubric of ‘Security and Growth for All’ (SAGAR) in pursuit of realising its ‘grand strategic’ vision of being a net security provider in the region. Revisiting its orientation towards the region also becomes a necessity considering recent developments and realignments in the Indo-Pacific theatre, especially the Aukus\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2021.1993660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2021.1993660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期《印度洋地区杂志》证明,通过对跨学科交叉点的批判性知情干预,印度洋研究正在不断扩大和深化。关于土著人民及其在海洋和渔业发展、沿海生态系统、海洋治理和管理中的作用的学术文献激增(Loch&Riechers,2021;Parsons、Taylor和Crease,2021)。这一研究机构强调土著传统和知识体系在生态可持续、文化敏感和社会包容性发展方面的重要性。它还丰富了印度洋地区研究和学术的本体论,使沿海社区和当地利益相关者的潜意识“小规模”运作更加突出,同时暴露了以国家为中心的方法在治理和管理人类对海洋空间和资源的快速使用和滥用方面的局限性。这些来自下方的观点无情地质疑了海洋安全和可持续性地理知识产生背后的政治。它们提请学术界和政策界注意,在普及蓝色经济和海洋治理的叙事中,以承认不同利益攸关方的不同世界观、观点和优先事项为代价,赋予特定的空间位置、规模和知识权力主张以特权,会产生深远的伦理和地缘政治影响。本期《JIOR》以Rosabelle Boswell和Jessica Leigh Thornton的一篇发人深省的文章开篇,该文章强调了知识多元主义在海洋治理中的重要性,并为将土著科伊桑人的观点、经历和世界观纳入南非主流的蓝色经济叙事提供了有说服力的理由。他们的主要论点是,全面、综合和包容地追求蓝色经济,不仅需要南非,而且应该对第一民族和土著知识系统在全球海洋管理制度中的地位进行批判性反思。我们期待着收到更多提交给JIOR的此类材料,重点关注印度洋地区不同次区域的案例研究。Somen Banerjee的这篇文章聚焦于“非洲之角”作为“印度洋地区战略支点”的出现,并为印度在“全民安全与增长”(SAGAR)的标题下“重新包装”其愿景和政策,以实现其成为该地区网络安全提供方的“大战略”愿景提供了有力的依据。考虑到印太地区,特别是奥库斯地区最近的发展和调整,重新调整其对该地区的定位也成为必要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Broadening and Deepening the Indian Ocean Studies
This edition of the Journal of the Indian Ocean Region (JIOR) bears testimony to the ongoing broadening and deepening of Indian Ocean studies by critically informed interventions on inter-disciplinary intersections. The scholarly literature on indigenous peoples and their role in marine and fisheries development, coastal ecosystems, marine governance, and management has seen a welcome surge (Loch & Riechers, 2021; Parsons, Taylor, & Crease, 2021). This body of research emphasizes the importance of indigenous traditions and knowledge systems in ecologically sustainable, culturally sensitive, and socially inclusive development. It also pluralizes the ontology of Indian Ocean Region research and scholarship, granting greater salience to the subliminal ‘small scale’ at which coastal communities and local stakeholders operate, while exposing the limitations of the state-centric approach to the governance and management of fast multiplying human uses –and abuses– of maritime space and resources. Such perspectives from below relentlessly interrogate politics behind the production of geographical knowledge of maritime security and sustainability. They invite both academic and policy attention to the profound and far-reaching ethical and geopolitical implications of privileging a particular space-place, scale, and knowledge-power claim in universalizing narratives of Blue Economy and ocean governance at the cost of acknowledging the diverse worldviews, perspectives and priorities of different stakeholders. The current edition of JIOR opens with a thought-provoking article by Rosabelle Boswell and Jessica Leigh Thornton, which highlights the importance of knowledge pluralism in ocean governance and makes a persuasive case for including the perspectives, experiences, and world views of indigenous Khoisan people into the mainstream Blue Economy narratives in South Africa. Their key argument is that a holistic, integrated, and inclusive pursuit of Blue Economy demands and deserves a critical rethinking of the place of First Peoples and indigenous knowledge systems not only by South Africa but also in global ocean management regimes. We look forward to receiving more such submissions to JIOR, focusing on case studies from diverse sub-regions of the Indian Ocean region. The article by Somen Banerjee focuses on the emergence of the ‘Horn of Africa as a ‘Strategic Pivot of the Indian Ocean Region’ and builds a strong case for India to ‘repackage’ its vision and policy under the rubric of ‘Security and Growth for All’ (SAGAR) in pursuit of realising its ‘grand strategic’ vision of being a net security provider in the region. Revisiting its orientation towards the region also becomes a necessity considering recent developments and realignments in the Indo-Pacific theatre, especially the Aukus
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1