1945–1960年战后法国的永久教育:循环制度和政策汇编

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1080/02660830.2021.2007675
B. Hake
{"title":"1945–1960年战后法国的永久教育:循环制度和政策汇编","authors":"B. Hake","doi":"10.1080/02660830.2021.2007675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The literature regarding the social organisation of ‘adult’ learning opportunities throughout the life course postulates different significations of policy concepts such as ‘lifelong education’, ‘permanent education’, ‘recurrent education’, and ‘lifelong learning’ in the 1970s. This paper examines policy formation processes in France during the 1950s when the development of éducation permanente was characterised by often-conflicting policy repertoires articulating arguments for redistributing opportunities to participate in organised (adult) learning throughout life. In the post-war context of rapid economic growth and technological change, it focuses on the policy repertoires articulated by the state, civil society organisations, and markets regarding individual and collective opportunities to continue to acquire knowledge, skills and sensitivities throughout life. Based upon a critical rereading of primary and secondary published texts, the analysis suggests that éducation permanente constituted a social field of problematic relationships between individual and collective interests regarding the acquisition of knowledge, skills and sensitivities. This constituted the dialectic between economic/vocational, technical reconversion practices in relation to social, cultural, and personal regeneration practices in a rapidly changing capitalist society. The conclusions identify a number of issues calling for further comparative historical research into often-conflicting policy repertoires that propagated policies to promote ‘long lives of learning’.","PeriodicalId":42210,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education permanente in post-war France, 1945–1960: Circulatory regimes and policy repertoires\",\"authors\":\"B. Hake\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02660830.2021.2007675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The literature regarding the social organisation of ‘adult’ learning opportunities throughout the life course postulates different significations of policy concepts such as ‘lifelong education’, ‘permanent education’, ‘recurrent education’, and ‘lifelong learning’ in the 1970s. This paper examines policy formation processes in France during the 1950s when the development of éducation permanente was characterised by often-conflicting policy repertoires articulating arguments for redistributing opportunities to participate in organised (adult) learning throughout life. In the post-war context of rapid economic growth and technological change, it focuses on the policy repertoires articulated by the state, civil society organisations, and markets regarding individual and collective opportunities to continue to acquire knowledge, skills and sensitivities throughout life. Based upon a critical rereading of primary and secondary published texts, the analysis suggests that éducation permanente constituted a social field of problematic relationships between individual and collective interests regarding the acquisition of knowledge, skills and sensitivities. This constituted the dialectic between economic/vocational, technical reconversion practices in relation to social, cultural, and personal regeneration practices in a rapidly changing capitalist society. The conclusions identify a number of issues calling for further comparative historical research into often-conflicting policy repertoires that propagated policies to promote ‘long lives of learning’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2021.2007675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2021.2007675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要关于“成人”学习机会在整个人生过程中的社会组织的文献假定了20世纪70年代“终身教育”、“永久教育”、”重复教育“和”终身学习“等政策概念的不同含义。本文考察了20世纪50年代法国的政策形成过程,当时长期教育的发展特点是经常发生冲突的政策曲目,阐述了重新分配终身参与有组织(成人)学习的机会的论点。在战后经济快速增长和技术变革的背景下,它侧重于国家、民间社会组织和市场制定的关于个人和集体在一生中继续获得知识、技能和敏感性的政策。根据对小学和中学出版文本的批判性重读,分析表明,永久教育构成了一个社会领域,在获取知识、技能和敏感性方面,个人和集体利益之间存在问题关系。这构成了在快速变化的资本主义社会中,经济/职业、技术改造实践与社会、文化和个人再生实践之间的辩证关系。这些结论确定了一些问题,需要对宣传促进“学习长寿”的政策的经常相互冲突的政策剧目进行进一步的比较历史研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Education permanente in post-war France, 1945–1960: Circulatory regimes and policy repertoires
Abstract The literature regarding the social organisation of ‘adult’ learning opportunities throughout the life course postulates different significations of policy concepts such as ‘lifelong education’, ‘permanent education’, ‘recurrent education’, and ‘lifelong learning’ in the 1970s. This paper examines policy formation processes in France during the 1950s when the development of éducation permanente was characterised by often-conflicting policy repertoires articulating arguments for redistributing opportunities to participate in organised (adult) learning throughout life. In the post-war context of rapid economic growth and technological change, it focuses on the policy repertoires articulated by the state, civil society organisations, and markets regarding individual and collective opportunities to continue to acquire knowledge, skills and sensitivities throughout life. Based upon a critical rereading of primary and secondary published texts, the analysis suggests that éducation permanente constituted a social field of problematic relationships between individual and collective interests regarding the acquisition of knowledge, skills and sensitivities. This constituted the dialectic between economic/vocational, technical reconversion practices in relation to social, cultural, and personal regeneration practices in a rapidly changing capitalist society. The conclusions identify a number of issues calling for further comparative historical research into often-conflicting policy repertoires that propagated policies to promote ‘long lives of learning’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE
Studies in the Education of Adults-NIACE EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Maternal health literacy and postpartum complication readiness among nursing mothers: Implications for adult literacy educators in Southern Cross River State, Nigeria Multilingual language assistants, investment and social justice in second language learning for adult newcomers Lifelong learning: The red-headed stepchild of Lebanon’s National Strategy for Older People Adult migrants’ voices about learning and using Swedish at work placements in basic language education Learning and gender in everyday life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1