基于对比学习的电动汽车充电站运行评价方法

IF 3.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Big Data and Cognitive Computing Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.3390/bdcc7030133
Ze-Yang Tang, Qi-Biao Hu, Yibo Cui, Lei Hu, Yi-Wen Li, Yu-Jie Li
{"title":"基于对比学习的电动汽车充电站运行评价方法","authors":"Ze-Yang Tang, Qi-Biao Hu, Yibo Cui, Lei Hu, Yi-Wen Li, Yu-Jie Li","doi":"10.3390/bdcc7030133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to address the issue of evaluating the operation of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs). Previous studies have commonly employed the method of constructing comprehensive evaluation systems, which greatly relies on manual experience for index selection and weight allocation. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes an evaluation method based on natural language models for assessing the operation of charging stations. By utilizing the proposed SimCSEBERT model, this study analyzes the operational data, user charging data, and basic information of charging stations to predict the operational status and identify influential factors. Additionally, this study compared the evaluation accuracy and impact factor analysis accuracy of the baseline and the proposed model. The experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves a higher evaluation accuracy (operation evaluation accuracy = 0.9464; impact factor analysis accuracy = 0.9492) and effectively assesses the operation of EVCSs. Compared with traditional evaluation methods, this approach exhibits improved universality and a higher level of intelligence. It provides insights into the operation of EVCSs and user demands, allowing for the resolution of supply–demand contradictions that are caused by power supply constraints and the uneven distribution of charging demands. Furthermore, it offers guidance for more efficient and targeted strategies for the operation of charging stations.","PeriodicalId":36397,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation Method of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Operation Based on Contrastive Learning\",\"authors\":\"Ze-Yang Tang, Qi-Biao Hu, Yibo Cui, Lei Hu, Yi-Wen Li, Yu-Jie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bdcc7030133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to address the issue of evaluating the operation of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs). Previous studies have commonly employed the method of constructing comprehensive evaluation systems, which greatly relies on manual experience for index selection and weight allocation. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes an evaluation method based on natural language models for assessing the operation of charging stations. By utilizing the proposed SimCSEBERT model, this study analyzes the operational data, user charging data, and basic information of charging stations to predict the operational status and identify influential factors. Additionally, this study compared the evaluation accuracy and impact factor analysis accuracy of the baseline and the proposed model. The experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves a higher evaluation accuracy (operation evaluation accuracy = 0.9464; impact factor analysis accuracy = 0.9492) and effectively assesses the operation of EVCSs. Compared with traditional evaluation methods, this approach exhibits improved universality and a higher level of intelligence. It provides insights into the operation of EVCSs and user demands, allowing for the resolution of supply–demand contradictions that are caused by power supply constraints and the uneven distribution of charging demands. Furthermore, it offers guidance for more efficient and targeted strategies for the operation of charging stations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Big Data and Cognitive Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7030133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7030133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在解决电动汽车充电站(EVCS)运营评估问题。以往的研究通常采用构建综合评价体系的方法,这在很大程度上依赖于人工经验进行指标选择和权重分配。为了克服这一局限性,本文提出了一种基于自然语言模型的充电站运营评估方法。利用所提出的SimCSEBERT模型,本研究分析了充电站的运营数据、用户充电数据和基本信息,以预测运营状态并识别影响因素。此外,本研究还比较了基线和所提出模型的评估准确性和影响因素分析准确性。实验结果表明,我们的模型实现了更高的评估精度(操作评估精度=0.9464;影响因素分析精度=0.9492),并有效地评估了EVCS的操作。与传统的评估方法相比,该方法具有更好的通用性和更高的智能化水平。它提供了对电动汽车运营和用户需求的深入了解,从而解决了由电力供应限制和充电需求分布不均引起的供需矛盾。此外,它还为充电站的运营提供了更高效、更有针对性的策略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation Method of Electric Vehicle Charging Station Operation Based on Contrastive Learning
This paper aims to address the issue of evaluating the operation of electric vehicle charging stations (EVCSs). Previous studies have commonly employed the method of constructing comprehensive evaluation systems, which greatly relies on manual experience for index selection and weight allocation. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes an evaluation method based on natural language models for assessing the operation of charging stations. By utilizing the proposed SimCSEBERT model, this study analyzes the operational data, user charging data, and basic information of charging stations to predict the operational status and identify influential factors. Additionally, this study compared the evaluation accuracy and impact factor analysis accuracy of the baseline and the proposed model. The experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves a higher evaluation accuracy (operation evaluation accuracy = 0.9464; impact factor analysis accuracy = 0.9492) and effectively assesses the operation of EVCSs. Compared with traditional evaluation methods, this approach exhibits improved universality and a higher level of intelligence. It provides insights into the operation of EVCSs and user demands, allowing for the resolution of supply–demand contradictions that are caused by power supply constraints and the uneven distribution of charging demands. Furthermore, it offers guidance for more efficient and targeted strategies for the operation of charging stations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Big Data and Cognitive Computing Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Incremental Deep Learning for Defect Detection in Manufacturing BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning Semantic Similarity of Common Verbal Expressions in Older Adults through a Pre-Trained Model Knowledge-Based and Generative-AI-Driven Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Comparative Study of Grice’s Cooperative Principles and Trust Distributed Bayesian Inference for Large-Scale IoT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1