大断裂后:国际药物管制制度崩溃的情景

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Drug Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2017-01-27 DOI:10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008
J. Caulkins
{"title":"大断裂后:国际药物管制制度崩溃的情景","authors":"J. Caulkins","doi":"10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract International prohibitions create asymmetries; production and transshipment concentrate in relatively few places that bear the bulk of the negative externalities created by the illegal trade. These externalities fuel calls for altering the United Nations treaty framework and for individual nations to legalize outside of the framework. Analyses of the pros and cons of legalization usually adopt the perspective of a single nation acting in isolation. However, one nation’s legalization alters incentives for others to act, and not always in obvious ways. So the proper perspective is that of a dynamic game. The primary contribution of this paper is to make the case for analyzing legalization as a strategic game, but it also offers preliminary analysis for the case of cocaine. Tentative conclusions include: – While decriminalizing possession of amounts of marijuana suitable for personal use has minimal repercussions beyond a nation’s borders, even one country’s legalization of a commercial cocaine or heroin industry could affect countries around the world. – Legalization of production in one country would draw production away from other producers who retain their prohibitions. This incentivizes current producers to encourage other such countries to legalize first, thereby addressing the first producer’s black market externalities without incurring opprobrium from final market countries. – Legalization in one transshipment country would likewise attract transportation activities from existing jurisdictions where drugs remain illegal. – The impact of a transshipment country legalizing cocaine varies by region. It might have minimal effect on the United States or Mexico if the “final mile” continues to be smuggling across the Mexico-United States border. By contrast, if an Eastern European country with large porous land borders were to legalize, that could dramatically alter supply conditions in Europe and Russia by producing covert smuggling networks similar to those currently existing on the U.S.-Mexico border.","PeriodicalId":38436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the Grand Fracture: Scenarios for the Collapse of the International Drug Control Regime\",\"authors\":\"J. Caulkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract International prohibitions create asymmetries; production and transshipment concentrate in relatively few places that bear the bulk of the negative externalities created by the illegal trade. These externalities fuel calls for altering the United Nations treaty framework and for individual nations to legalize outside of the framework. Analyses of the pros and cons of legalization usually adopt the perspective of a single nation acting in isolation. However, one nation’s legalization alters incentives for others to act, and not always in obvious ways. So the proper perspective is that of a dynamic game. The primary contribution of this paper is to make the case for analyzing legalization as a strategic game, but it also offers preliminary analysis for the case of cocaine. Tentative conclusions include: – While decriminalizing possession of amounts of marijuana suitable for personal use has minimal repercussions beyond a nation’s borders, even one country’s legalization of a commercial cocaine or heroin industry could affect countries around the world. – Legalization of production in one country would draw production away from other producers who retain their prohibitions. This incentivizes current producers to encourage other such countries to legalize first, thereby addressing the first producer’s black market externalities without incurring opprobrium from final market countries. – Legalization in one transshipment country would likewise attract transportation activities from existing jurisdictions where drugs remain illegal. – The impact of a transshipment country legalizing cocaine varies by region. It might have minimal effect on the United States or Mexico if the “final mile” continues to be smuggling across the Mexico-United States border. By contrast, if an Eastern European country with large porous land borders were to legalize, that could dramatically alter supply conditions in Europe and Russia by producing covert smuggling networks similar to those currently existing on the U.S.-Mexico border.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jdpa-2015-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要国际禁令造成不对称;生产和转运集中在相对较少的地方,这些地方承担了非法贸易造成的大部分负外部性。这些外部因素促使人们呼吁改变联合国条约框架,并要求个别国家在框架之外合法化。对合法化利弊的分析通常采用单一国家孤立行动的观点。然而,一个国家的合法化改变了其他国家采取行动的动机,而且并不总是以明显的方式。因此,正确的视角是动态游戏。本文的主要贡献是将合法化作为一种战略游戏进行分析,但也对可卡因案件进行了初步分析。初步结论包括:虽然将持有大量适合个人使用的大麻合法化在一个国家之外的影响微乎其微,但即使一个国家将商业可卡因或海洛因行业合法化,也可能影响世界各国一个国家的生产合法化将使生产远离其他保留禁令的生产商。这激励了当前生产商鼓励其他此类国家首先合法化,从而解决了第一生产商的黑市外部性问题,而不会招致最终市场国家的谴责一个转运国的合法化同样会吸引来自毒品仍然非法的现有司法管辖区的运输活动转运国使可卡因合法化的影响因地区而异。如果“最后一英里”继续通过墨西哥-美国边境走私,对美国或墨西哥的影响可能微乎其微。相比之下,如果一个陆地边界漏洞百出的东欧国家合法化,这可能会通过建立类似于目前美墨边境的秘密走私网络,极大地改变欧洲和俄罗斯的供应条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
After the Grand Fracture: Scenarios for the Collapse of the International Drug Control Regime
Abstract International prohibitions create asymmetries; production and transshipment concentrate in relatively few places that bear the bulk of the negative externalities created by the illegal trade. These externalities fuel calls for altering the United Nations treaty framework and for individual nations to legalize outside of the framework. Analyses of the pros and cons of legalization usually adopt the perspective of a single nation acting in isolation. However, one nation’s legalization alters incentives for others to act, and not always in obvious ways. So the proper perspective is that of a dynamic game. The primary contribution of this paper is to make the case for analyzing legalization as a strategic game, but it also offers preliminary analysis for the case of cocaine. Tentative conclusions include: – While decriminalizing possession of amounts of marijuana suitable for personal use has minimal repercussions beyond a nation’s borders, even one country’s legalization of a commercial cocaine or heroin industry could affect countries around the world. – Legalization of production in one country would draw production away from other producers who retain their prohibitions. This incentivizes current producers to encourage other such countries to legalize first, thereby addressing the first producer’s black market externalities without incurring opprobrium from final market countries. – Legalization in one transshipment country would likewise attract transportation activities from existing jurisdictions where drugs remain illegal. – The impact of a transshipment country legalizing cocaine varies by region. It might have minimal effect on the United States or Mexico if the “final mile” continues to be smuggling across the Mexico-United States border. By contrast, if an Eastern European country with large porous land borders were to legalize, that could dramatically alter supply conditions in Europe and Russia by producing covert smuggling networks similar to those currently existing on the U.S.-Mexico border.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Don’t Let the COVID-19 Crisis Go to Waste: Breaking Through the Status Quo & Flattening the Opioid Epidemic Curve An Examination of Racial Disparities in Misdemeanor Marijuana Possession Arrests Following Reforms in Four U.S. Jurisdictions Did the 2018 Farm Bill’s Hemp Provisions Decriminalize Marijuana? Problematising ‘Recovery’ in Drug Policy within Great Britain: A Comparative Policy Analysis Between England, Wales and Scotland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1