气候保护活动、经济偏好和生活满意度之间的关系:德国的经验证据

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106938
Thilo K.G. Haverkamp , Heinz Welsch , Andreas Ziegler
{"title":"气候保护活动、经济偏好和生活满意度之间的关系:德国的经验证据","authors":"Thilo K.G. Haverkamp ,&nbsp;Heinz Welsch ,&nbsp;Andreas Ziegler","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Based on widely representative data for 1614 citizens in Germany, this paper empirically examines the relationship between different types of environmental protection activities and subjective well-being (SWB) in terms of life satisfaction by specifically considering the </span>role of economic preferences for this relationship. With respect to pro-environmental behavior, we distinguish between stated environmental protection activities and revealed pro-environmental behavior in terms of climate protection activities, which are measured with an incentivized donation scheme. Our empirical analysis reveals that not only stated environmental protection activities (contributing more or less to climate protection), but also more reliable revealed climate protection activities are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. Furthermore, economic preferences play an important role since risk-taking preferences, patience, and trust are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. In particular, the estimated correlations between environmental protection activities and life satisfaction become weaker when economic preferences are included in the </span>econometric analysis. These results strongly suggest omitted variable bias in cross-sectional econometric analyses of the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and SWB when economic preferences are not included as control variables. With respect to the distinction between different groups of (stated) environmental protection activities, our empirical analysis also shows that (electricity-related) direct climate protection activities and costly environmental protection activities are more positively correlated with life satisfaction than less costly or non-costly general environmental protection activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 106938"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between climate protection activities, economic preferences, and life satisfaction: Empirical evidence for Germany\",\"authors\":\"Thilo K.G. Haverkamp ,&nbsp;Heinz Welsch ,&nbsp;Andreas Ziegler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Based on widely representative data for 1614 citizens in Germany, this paper empirically examines the relationship between different types of environmental protection activities and subjective well-being (SWB) in terms of life satisfaction by specifically considering the </span>role of economic preferences for this relationship. With respect to pro-environmental behavior, we distinguish between stated environmental protection activities and revealed pro-environmental behavior in terms of climate protection activities, which are measured with an incentivized donation scheme. Our empirical analysis reveals that not only stated environmental protection activities (contributing more or less to climate protection), but also more reliable revealed climate protection activities are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. Furthermore, economic preferences play an important role since risk-taking preferences, patience, and trust are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. In particular, the estimated correlations between environmental protection activities and life satisfaction become weaker when economic preferences are included in the </span>econometric analysis. These results strongly suggest omitted variable bias in cross-sectional econometric analyses of the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and SWB when economic preferences are not included as control variables. With respect to the distinction between different groups of (stated) environmental protection activities, our empirical analysis also shows that (electricity-related) direct climate protection activities and costly environmental protection activities are more positively correlated with life satisfaction than less costly or non-costly general environmental protection activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832300436X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014098832300436X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于1614名德国公民的广泛代表性数据,本文通过具体考虑经济偏好在这种关系中的作用,实证检验了不同类型的环境保护活动与主观幸福感(SWB)在生活满意度方面的关系。关于亲环境行为,我们在气候保护活动方面区分了声明的环境保护活动和显示的亲环境行为,这是通过激励捐赠计划来衡量的。我们的实证分析表明,不仅口头环境保护活动(对气候保护的贡献或多或少)与生活满意度呈显著正相关,而且更可靠的披露气候保护活动与生活满意度呈显著正相关。此外,经济偏好也发挥了重要作用,因为冒险偏好、耐心和信任与生活满意度显著正相关。特别是,当经济偏好被纳入计量经济分析时,环境保护活动与生活满意度之间的估计相关性变得较弱。这些结果强烈表明,当经济偏好不作为控制变量时,在亲环境行为和SWB之间关系的横断面计量分析中遗漏了变量偏差。对于不同类型(声明的)环境保护活动之间的区别,我们的实证分析还表明,(与电力相关的)直接气候保护活动和昂贵的环境保护活动与生活满意度的正相关程度高于成本较低或非成本的一般环境保护活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between climate protection activities, economic preferences, and life satisfaction: Empirical evidence for Germany

Based on widely representative data for 1614 citizens in Germany, this paper empirically examines the relationship between different types of environmental protection activities and subjective well-being (SWB) in terms of life satisfaction by specifically considering the role of economic preferences for this relationship. With respect to pro-environmental behavior, we distinguish between stated environmental protection activities and revealed pro-environmental behavior in terms of climate protection activities, which are measured with an incentivized donation scheme. Our empirical analysis reveals that not only stated environmental protection activities (contributing more or less to climate protection), but also more reliable revealed climate protection activities are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. Furthermore, economic preferences play an important role since risk-taking preferences, patience, and trust are significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction. In particular, the estimated correlations between environmental protection activities and life satisfaction become weaker when economic preferences are included in the econometric analysis. These results strongly suggest omitted variable bias in cross-sectional econometric analyses of the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and SWB when economic preferences are not included as control variables. With respect to the distinction between different groups of (stated) environmental protection activities, our empirical analysis also shows that (electricity-related) direct climate protection activities and costly environmental protection activities are more positively correlated with life satisfaction than less costly or non-costly general environmental protection activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Zooming in or zooming out: Energy strategy, developmental parity and regional entrepreneurial dynamism How financial derivatives affect energy firms' ESG The performance of renewable-rich wholesale electricity markets with significant energy storage and flexibility Retraction notice to “Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: Evidence from two of the biggest global players” Energy Economics Volume 126, October 2023, 106,983. Novel and old news sentiment in commodity futures markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1