机械结构中不同粘接接头类型的比较

IF 1.68 Q2 Dentistry Applied Adhesion Science Pub Date : 2018-12-24 DOI:10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1
N. G. C. Barbosa, R. D. S. G. Campilho, F. J. G. Silva, R. D. F. Moreira
{"title":"机械结构中不同粘接接头类型的比较","authors":"N. G. C. Barbosa,&nbsp;R. D. S. G. Campilho,&nbsp;F. J. G. Silva,&nbsp;R. D. F. Moreira","doi":"10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adhesively-bonded joints are widely used to join structural components. The most common joint types are single-lap joints (SLJ), double-lap joints (DLJ), stepped-lap joints and scarf joints. Several factors influence the behaviour and strength of an adhesive joint, namely the type of adhesive (brittle or ductile, strong or weak) and joint geometry. One of the most important parameters that affects the joint strength is the overlap length (<i>L</i><sub>O</sub>). A comparative study that involves several joint geometries and uses adhesives with different characteristics was carried out to check which type of adhesive is most suitable for a particular joint geometry. For this purpose, SLJ, DLJ, stepped-lap joints and scarf joints were chosen for testing with three adhesives. The experimental results were compared with numerical results obtained from Abaqus<sup>?</sup> using an integrated cohesive zone modelling module. Initially, a stress analysis was carried out to compare the different joint geometries. With this work, it was concluded that the optimal joint type significantly depends on the type of adhesive used, such that less strong and ductile adhesives are more suitable for joint geometries that exhibit large stress variations, while stronger but more brittle adhesives are recommended for joint geometries with more uniform stresses.</p>","PeriodicalId":464,"journal":{"name":"Applied Adhesion Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6800,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different adhesively-bonded joint types for mechanical structures\",\"authors\":\"N. G. C. Barbosa,&nbsp;R. D. S. G. Campilho,&nbsp;F. J. G. Silva,&nbsp;R. D. F. Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Adhesively-bonded joints are widely used to join structural components. The most common joint types are single-lap joints (SLJ), double-lap joints (DLJ), stepped-lap joints and scarf joints. Several factors influence the behaviour and strength of an adhesive joint, namely the type of adhesive (brittle or ductile, strong or weak) and joint geometry. One of the most important parameters that affects the joint strength is the overlap length (<i>L</i><sub>O</sub>). A comparative study that involves several joint geometries and uses adhesives with different characteristics was carried out to check which type of adhesive is most suitable for a particular joint geometry. For this purpose, SLJ, DLJ, stepped-lap joints and scarf joints were chosen for testing with three adhesives. The experimental results were compared with numerical results obtained from Abaqus<sup>?</sup> using an integrated cohesive zone modelling module. Initially, a stress analysis was carried out to compare the different joint geometries. With this work, it was concluded that the optimal joint type significantly depends on the type of adhesive used, such that less strong and ductile adhesives are more suitable for joint geometries that exhibit large stress variations, while stronger but more brittle adhesives are recommended for joint geometries with more uniform stresses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6800,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Adhesion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Adhesion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40563-018-0116-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

粘接接头被广泛用于连接结构部件。最常见的接头类型是单搭接(SLJ)、双搭接(DLJ)、阶梯搭接和围巾搭接。有几个因素影响粘合接头的性能和强度,即粘合剂的类型(脆性或延性,强或弱)和接头的几何形状。重叠长度是影响接头强度最重要的参数之一。对几种关节几何形状和不同特性的粘合剂进行了比较研究,以检查哪种类型的粘合剂最适合特定的关节几何形状。为此,选择SLJ、DLJ、阶梯搭接和围巾接头用三种胶粘剂进行测试。实验结果与Abaqus?使用集成的内聚区域建模模块。首先,进行了应力分析,以比较不同的接缝几何形状。通过这项工作,得出的结论是,最佳的接缝类型在很大程度上取决于所使用的粘合剂的类型,因此,较弱和韧性的粘合剂更适合具有较大应力变化的接缝几何形状,而较强但较脆的粘合剂则推荐用于具有更均匀应力的接缝几何形状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of different adhesively-bonded joint types for mechanical structures

Adhesively-bonded joints are widely used to join structural components. The most common joint types are single-lap joints (SLJ), double-lap joints (DLJ), stepped-lap joints and scarf joints. Several factors influence the behaviour and strength of an adhesive joint, namely the type of adhesive (brittle or ductile, strong or weak) and joint geometry. One of the most important parameters that affects the joint strength is the overlap length (LO). A comparative study that involves several joint geometries and uses adhesives with different characteristics was carried out to check which type of adhesive is most suitable for a particular joint geometry. For this purpose, SLJ, DLJ, stepped-lap joints and scarf joints were chosen for testing with three adhesives. The experimental results were compared with numerical results obtained from Abaqus? using an integrated cohesive zone modelling module. Initially, a stress analysis was carried out to compare the different joint geometries. With this work, it was concluded that the optimal joint type significantly depends on the type of adhesive used, such that less strong and ductile adhesives are more suitable for joint geometries that exhibit large stress variations, while stronger but more brittle adhesives are recommended for joint geometries with more uniform stresses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Adhesion Science
Applied Adhesion Science Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Adhesion Science focuses on practical applications of adhesives, with special emphasis in fields such as oil industry, aerospace and biomedicine. Topics related to the phenomena of adhesion and the application of adhesive materials are welcome, especially in biomedical areas such as adhesive dentistry. Both theoretical and experimental works are considered for publication. Applied Adhesion Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal''s open access policy offers a fast publication workflow whilst maintaining rigorous peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Effect of interface-active proteins on the salt crystal size in waterborne hybrid materials Mechanical properties of unmodified and montmorillonite-modified epoxy compounds. Part I: compression test Influence of biobased polyol type on the properties of polyurethane hotmelt adhesives for footwear joints In vitro antibacterial effect of fifth generation dentin bonding agent incorporated with nisin on Streptococcus mutans Antioxidant pre-treatments are able to reduce waiting time for restorative treatment after dental bleaching: a microtensile bond strength exploratory study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1