澳大利亚执业护士和助产士的长效可逆避孕处方覆盖率

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2023.04.004
Sharon James , Aline Kunnel , Jane Tomnay , Danielle Mazza , Luke Grzeskowiak
{"title":"澳大利亚执业护士和助产士的长效可逆避孕处方覆盖率","authors":"Sharon James ,&nbsp;Aline Kunnel ,&nbsp;Jane Tomnay ,&nbsp;Danielle Mazza ,&nbsp;Luke Grzeskowiak","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Expanded patient access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is needed to support patient choice and access to efficacious forms of contraception. Little is known about nurse practitioner (NP) and midwife LARC prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine LARC prescribing by NPs and midwives in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data from 2018 to 2021 for females aged 15–54. Age‐standardised rates were calculated by state, remoteness area, and level 3 statistical areas (SA3s).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Despite a 1.6 fold increase since 2018, NPs and midwives accounted for 0.82 % (n = 2184) of prescriptions for LARC dispensed in 2021. The percentage of services in 2021 was greater in outer regional (2.21 %) and lowest in major cities (0.68 %) and was higher for the implant (0.92 %) compared with the hormonal intrauterine device (0.76 %). The proportion of total SA3s where a NP/midwife prescribed LARC increased from 23.35 % in 2018 to 29.94 % in 2021. NP/midwife LARC prescribing was highest in outer regional (42.6 %) and lowest in remote areas (18.8 %). When stratified by state/territory, coverage of SA3s was highest in Australian Capital Territory (50.0 %) and lowest in the Northern Territory (11.1 %).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that whilst there has been an increase in NP and midwife LARC prescribing, the overall rate remains low and coverage across Australia appears fragmented. NPs and midwives are well placed to enhance women’s access to efficacious forms of contraception, but this requires future efforts to identify and address critical barriers (e.g. legislative, funding, training) to service provision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 627-632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-acting reversible contraception prescribing coverage by nurse practitioners and midwives in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Sharon James ,&nbsp;Aline Kunnel ,&nbsp;Jane Tomnay ,&nbsp;Danielle Mazza ,&nbsp;Luke Grzeskowiak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Expanded patient access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is needed to support patient choice and access to efficacious forms of contraception. Little is known about nurse practitioner (NP) and midwife LARC prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine LARC prescribing by NPs and midwives in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data from 2018 to 2021 for females aged 15–54. Age‐standardised rates were calculated by state, remoteness area, and level 3 statistical areas (SA3s).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Despite a 1.6 fold increase since 2018, NPs and midwives accounted for 0.82 % (n = 2184) of prescriptions for LARC dispensed in 2021. The percentage of services in 2021 was greater in outer regional (2.21 %) and lowest in major cities (0.68 %) and was higher for the implant (0.92 %) compared with the hormonal intrauterine device (0.76 %). The proportion of total SA3s where a NP/midwife prescribed LARC increased from 23.35 % in 2018 to 29.94 % in 2021. NP/midwife LARC prescribing was highest in outer regional (42.6 %) and lowest in remote areas (18.8 %). When stratified by state/territory, coverage of SA3s was highest in Australian Capital Territory (50.0 %) and lowest in the Northern Territory (11.1 %).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that whilst there has been an increase in NP and midwife LARC prescribing, the overall rate remains low and coverage across Australia appears fragmented. NPs and midwives are well placed to enhance women’s access to efficacious forms of contraception, but this requires future efforts to identify and address critical barriers (e.g. legislative, funding, training) to service provision.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 627-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300046X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S132276962300046X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:需要扩大患者获得长效可逆避孕(LARC)的途径,以支持患者选择和获得有效的避孕方式。对执业护士(NP)和助产士LARC处方知之甚少。目的调查澳大利亚护士和助产士的LARC处方。方法对澳大利亚药品福利计划2018年至2021年15-54岁女性配药数据进行横断面研究。年龄标准化率按州、偏远地区和3级统计区(SA3s)计算。尽管自2018年以来增加了1.6倍,但NPs和助产士在2021年分配的LARC处方中占0.82% (n = 2184)。2021年的服务比例在外围地区最高(2.21%),在主要城市最低(0.68%),植入物的服务比例(0.92%)高于激素宫内节育器(0.76%)。NP/助产士开具LARC处方的所有sa3的比例从2018年的23.35%上升到2021年的29.94%。NP/助产士LARC处方在外围地区最高(42.6%),在偏远地区最低(18.8%)。按州/地区分层时,澳大利亚首都地区的sa3覆盖率最高(50.0%),北领地最低(11.1%)。讨论和结论我们的研究结果表明,虽然NP和助产士LARC处方有所增加,但总体比率仍然很低,整个澳大利亚的覆盖范围似乎很分散。国家计划生育人员和助产士完全有能力提高妇女获得有效避孕方式的机会,但这需要今后努力确定和解决服务提供方面的关键障碍(例如立法、资金、培训)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-acting reversible contraception prescribing coverage by nurse practitioners and midwives in Australia

Background

Expanded patient access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is needed to support patient choice and access to efficacious forms of contraception. Little is known about nurse practitioner (NP) and midwife LARC prescribing.

Aims

To examine LARC prescribing by NPs and midwives in Australia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data from 2018 to 2021 for females aged 15–54. Age‐standardised rates were calculated by state, remoteness area, and level 3 statistical areas (SA3s).

Findings

Despite a 1.6 fold increase since 2018, NPs and midwives accounted for 0.82 % (n = 2184) of prescriptions for LARC dispensed in 2021. The percentage of services in 2021 was greater in outer regional (2.21 %) and lowest in major cities (0.68 %) and was higher for the implant (0.92 %) compared with the hormonal intrauterine device (0.76 %). The proportion of total SA3s where a NP/midwife prescribed LARC increased from 23.35 % in 2018 to 29.94 % in 2021. NP/midwife LARC prescribing was highest in outer regional (42.6 %) and lowest in remote areas (18.8 %). When stratified by state/territory, coverage of SA3s was highest in Australian Capital Territory (50.0 %) and lowest in the Northern Territory (11.1 %).

Discussion and conclusion

Our findings suggest that whilst there has been an increase in NP and midwife LARC prescribing, the overall rate remains low and coverage across Australia appears fragmented. NPs and midwives are well placed to enhance women’s access to efficacious forms of contraception, but this requires future efforts to identify and address critical barriers (e.g. legislative, funding, training) to service provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Staff perceptions of the potential for nurses to address service gaps within a homeless health service in Sydney, Australia: Results of a cross-sectional survey Workplace violence against nurses in rural governmental hospitals in Jordan Implementation of evidence-based practice in paediatric nursing care: Facilitators and barriers Weaning small babies from incubator to cot: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1