冰川海洋沉积物的粒度和矿物变异性

IF 2 4区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY Journal of Sedimentary Research Pub Date : 2023-01-18 DOI:10.2110/jsr.2022.044
J. Andrews, Wendy J. Roth, A. Jennings
{"title":"冰川海洋沉积物的粒度和矿物变异性","authors":"J. Andrews, Wendy J. Roth, A. Jennings","doi":"10.2110/jsr.2022.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Glacial marine sediment deposition varies both spatially and temporally, but nearly all studies evaluate down-core (∼ time) variations in sediment variables with little consideration for across core variability, or even the consistency of a data set over distance scales of 1 to 1000 m. Grain size and quantitative X-ray diffraction (qXRD) methods require only ≤ 1 g of sediment and thus analyses assume that the identification of coarse sand (i.e., ice-rafted debris) and sediment mineral composition are representative of the depth intervals. This assumption was tested for grain size and mineral weight % on core MD99-2317, off East Greenland. Samples were taken from two sections of the core that had contrasting coarse-sand content. A total of fourteen samples were taken consisting of seven (vertical) and two (horizontal) samples, with five replicates per sample for qXRD analyses and ∼ 10 to 20 replicates for grain size. They had an average dry weight of 10.5 ± 0.5 g and are compared with two previous sets of sediment samples that averaged 54.1 ± 18.9 g and 20.77 ± 5.8 g dry weight. The results indicated some significant differences between the pairs of samples for grain-size parameters (mean sortable silt, and median grain size) but little difference in the estimates of mineral weight percentages. Out of 84 paired mineral and grain-size comparisons only 17 were significantly different at p = < 0.05 in the post-hoc Scheffe test, all of which were linked to grain-size attributes.","PeriodicalId":17044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sedimentary Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grain size and mineral variability of glacial marine sediments\",\"authors\":\"J. Andrews, Wendy J. Roth, A. Jennings\",\"doi\":\"10.2110/jsr.2022.044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Glacial marine sediment deposition varies both spatially and temporally, but nearly all studies evaluate down-core (∼ time) variations in sediment variables with little consideration for across core variability, or even the consistency of a data set over distance scales of 1 to 1000 m. Grain size and quantitative X-ray diffraction (qXRD) methods require only ≤ 1 g of sediment and thus analyses assume that the identification of coarse sand (i.e., ice-rafted debris) and sediment mineral composition are representative of the depth intervals. This assumption was tested for grain size and mineral weight % on core MD99-2317, off East Greenland. Samples were taken from two sections of the core that had contrasting coarse-sand content. A total of fourteen samples were taken consisting of seven (vertical) and two (horizontal) samples, with five replicates per sample for qXRD analyses and ∼ 10 to 20 replicates for grain size. They had an average dry weight of 10.5 ± 0.5 g and are compared with two previous sets of sediment samples that averaged 54.1 ± 18.9 g and 20.77 ± 5.8 g dry weight. The results indicated some significant differences between the pairs of samples for grain-size parameters (mean sortable silt, and median grain size) but little difference in the estimates of mineral weight percentages. Out of 84 paired mineral and grain-size comparisons only 17 were significantly different at p = < 0.05 in the post-hoc Scheffe test, all of which were linked to grain-size attributes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sedimentary Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sedimentary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2022.044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sedimentary Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2022.044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冰川海洋沉积物沉积在空间和时间上都有变化,但几乎所有研究都评估沉积物变量的岩心下(~时间)变化,几乎没有考虑岩心间的变化,甚至没有考虑1至1000m距离尺度上数据集的一致性。粒度和定量X射线衍射(qXRD)方法只需要≤1g的沉积物,因此分析假设粗砂(即冰椽碎屑)的鉴定和沉积物矿物成分代表了深度间隔。这一假设在东格陵兰岛附近的MD99-2317岩芯上进行了粒度和矿物重量%的测试。从具有对比粗砂含量的岩芯的两个部分取样。共采集了14个样品,包括7个(垂直)和2个(水平)样品,每个样品进行5次qXRD分析,粒度进行10至20次重复。它们的平均干重为10.5±0.5 g,并与之前两组平均干重分别为54.1±18.9 g和20.77±5.8 g的沉积物样本进行了比较。结果表明,两对样品在粒度参数(平均可分选粉土和中值粒度)方面存在一些显著差异,但在矿物重量百分比的估计方面几乎没有差异。在84个成对的矿物和粒度比较中,只有17个在事后Scheffe检验中有显著差异,p=<0.05,所有这些都与粒度属性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grain size and mineral variability of glacial marine sediments
Glacial marine sediment deposition varies both spatially and temporally, but nearly all studies evaluate down-core (∼ time) variations in sediment variables with little consideration for across core variability, or even the consistency of a data set over distance scales of 1 to 1000 m. Grain size and quantitative X-ray diffraction (qXRD) methods require only ≤ 1 g of sediment and thus analyses assume that the identification of coarse sand (i.e., ice-rafted debris) and sediment mineral composition are representative of the depth intervals. This assumption was tested for grain size and mineral weight % on core MD99-2317, off East Greenland. Samples were taken from two sections of the core that had contrasting coarse-sand content. A total of fourteen samples were taken consisting of seven (vertical) and two (horizontal) samples, with five replicates per sample for qXRD analyses and ∼ 10 to 20 replicates for grain size. They had an average dry weight of 10.5 ± 0.5 g and are compared with two previous sets of sediment samples that averaged 54.1 ± 18.9 g and 20.77 ± 5.8 g dry weight. The results indicated some significant differences between the pairs of samples for grain-size parameters (mean sortable silt, and median grain size) but little difference in the estimates of mineral weight percentages. Out of 84 paired mineral and grain-size comparisons only 17 were significantly different at p = < 0.05 in the post-hoc Scheffe test, all of which were linked to grain-size attributes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal is broad and international in scope and welcomes contributions that further the fundamental understanding of sedimentary processes, the origin of sedimentary deposits, the workings of sedimentary systems, and the records of earth history contained within sedimentary rocks.
期刊最新文献
Recognition of cross-shore dynamics of longshore bars in upper-shoreface deposits of prograding sandy coastal barriers Deep-Water Fan Hierarchy: Assumptions, Evidence, and Numerical Modelling Analysis Anatomy of Niger and Benue river sediments from clay to granule: grain-size dependence and provenance budgets Random and time-persistent depositional processes in turbidite successions: an example from the marine deep-water Aoshima Formation (Neogene, Kyushu Island, southwest Japan) Rapid diagenesis and microbial biosignature degradation in spring carbonates from Crystal Geyser, Utah, U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1