一家以西班牙裔为主的社区医院的妊娠期体重增加和妊娠期大新生儿

Brittany N Robles
{"title":"一家以西班牙裔为主的社区医院的妊娠期体重增加和妊娠期大新生儿","authors":"Brittany N Robles","doi":"10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To analyse changes in Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) in different Body Mass Index (BMI) categories at start of pregnancy and neonatal birth weight outcomes in a predominantly Hispanic population living in a low-income environment. We conducted a cross sectional study of women with singleton gestation who delivered at Wyckoff Heights Medical Centre from January 1 st to December 31 st , 2017. BMI was categorized at first prenatal visit as normal weight (BMI= 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI= 25-29.9) and obese (BMI >30). BMI was collected at 16-20, 24-28, and 36-38 weeks of gestation. Stratified by BMI, appropriate GWG were 25–35 pounds for normal weight (27.9%), 15–25 pounds for overweight (34.5%), and 11–20 pounds for obese (24.5%). Neonatal birth weight was categorized by Duryea percentiles and gestational age in weeks. From 831 women, normal weight (n=269), overweight (n=263), and obese (n=299) women were found. GWG was categorized as: inadequate, appropriate, or excessive based on the Institute of Medicine guidelines. The prevalence of excessive GWG was 23.1% for normal weight, 35.8% for overweight, and 37.5% for obese women. The prevalence of inadequate GWG was 48.9% for normal weight, 31.0% for overweight, and 40.6% for obese women. A significant association was found between obese women and >90 percentile neonatal birth weight (OR:2.3, 95% CI: 1.15-4.97). Obese women were more likely to have excessive GWG which is associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes such as NICU admissions, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, delivery by caesarean section, large for gestational age, and shoulder dystocia.","PeriodicalId":87379,"journal":{"name":"World journal of gynecology & womens health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestational Weight Gain and Large for Gestational Age Neonates in a Predominantly Hispanic Population Community Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Brittany N Robles\",\"doi\":\"10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To analyse changes in Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) in different Body Mass Index (BMI) categories at start of pregnancy and neonatal birth weight outcomes in a predominantly Hispanic population living in a low-income environment. We conducted a cross sectional study of women with singleton gestation who delivered at Wyckoff Heights Medical Centre from January 1 st to December 31 st , 2017. BMI was categorized at first prenatal visit as normal weight (BMI= 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI= 25-29.9) and obese (BMI >30). BMI was collected at 16-20, 24-28, and 36-38 weeks of gestation. Stratified by BMI, appropriate GWG were 25–35 pounds for normal weight (27.9%), 15–25 pounds for overweight (34.5%), and 11–20 pounds for obese (24.5%). Neonatal birth weight was categorized by Duryea percentiles and gestational age in weeks. From 831 women, normal weight (n=269), overweight (n=263), and obese (n=299) women were found. GWG was categorized as: inadequate, appropriate, or excessive based on the Institute of Medicine guidelines. The prevalence of excessive GWG was 23.1% for normal weight, 35.8% for overweight, and 37.5% for obese women. The prevalence of inadequate GWG was 48.9% for normal weight, 31.0% for overweight, and 40.6% for obese women. A significant association was found between obese women and >90 percentile neonatal birth weight (OR:2.3, 95% CI: 1.15-4.97). Obese women were more likely to have excessive GWG which is associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes such as NICU admissions, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, delivery by caesarean section, large for gestational age, and shoulder dystocia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of gynecology & womens health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of gynecology & womens health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of gynecology & womens health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjgwh.2020.03.000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析生活在低收入环境中的以西班牙裔为主的人群在怀孕初期不同体重指数(BMI)类别的妊娠期体重增加(GWG)的变化和新生儿出生体重结果。我们对2017年1月1日至12月31日在Wyckoff Heights医疗中心分娩的单胎妊娠妇女进行了横断面研究。第一次产前检查时,BMI分为正常体重(BMI=18.5-24.9)、超重(BMI=25-29.9)和肥胖(BMI>30)。在妊娠16-20、24-28和36-38周时收集BMI。按BMI分层,正常体重(27.9%)的GWG为25-35磅,超重(34.5%)为15-25磅,肥胖(24.5%)为11-20磅。新生儿出生体重按Duryea百分位数和孕周进行分类。在831名女性中,发现了体重正常(n=269)、超重(n=263)和肥胖(n=299)的女性。根据医学研究所的指导方针,GWG被归类为:不充分、适当或过度。正常体重女性的GWG过度患病率为23.1%,超重女性为35.8%,肥胖女性为37.5%。正常体重女性GWG不足的患病率为48.9%,超重女性为31.0%,肥胖女性为40.6%。肥胖女性与>90%的新生儿出生体重之间存在显著相关性(OR:2.3,95%CI:1.15-4.97)。肥胖女性更有可能出现GWG过高,这与产妇和新生儿的不良后果有关,如新生儿重症监护室入院、妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠期高血压疾病、剖腹产、,肩难产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gestational Weight Gain and Large for Gestational Age Neonates in a Predominantly Hispanic Population Community Hospital
To analyse changes in Gestational Weight Gain (GWG) in different Body Mass Index (BMI) categories at start of pregnancy and neonatal birth weight outcomes in a predominantly Hispanic population living in a low-income environment. We conducted a cross sectional study of women with singleton gestation who delivered at Wyckoff Heights Medical Centre from January 1 st to December 31 st , 2017. BMI was categorized at first prenatal visit as normal weight (BMI= 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI= 25-29.9) and obese (BMI >30). BMI was collected at 16-20, 24-28, and 36-38 weeks of gestation. Stratified by BMI, appropriate GWG were 25–35 pounds for normal weight (27.9%), 15–25 pounds for overweight (34.5%), and 11–20 pounds for obese (24.5%). Neonatal birth weight was categorized by Duryea percentiles and gestational age in weeks. From 831 women, normal weight (n=269), overweight (n=263), and obese (n=299) women were found. GWG was categorized as: inadequate, appropriate, or excessive based on the Institute of Medicine guidelines. The prevalence of excessive GWG was 23.1% for normal weight, 35.8% for overweight, and 37.5% for obese women. The prevalence of inadequate GWG was 48.9% for normal weight, 31.0% for overweight, and 40.6% for obese women. A significant association was found between obese women and >90 percentile neonatal birth weight (OR:2.3, 95% CI: 1.15-4.97). Obese women were more likely to have excessive GWG which is associated with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes such as NICU admissions, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, delivery by caesarean section, large for gestational age, and shoulder dystocia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends and Evolution in Women's Health Workforce in the First Quarter of the 21st Century. Post-Coital Seepage - A Rarely-Discussed, Yet Common Inconvenience for Most Women: A Main Systematic Review For Those with Inadequate Legal Documents, COVID-19 Vaccination Remains Challenging. Histopathological Findings in Symptomatizing Patients After Supracervical Hysterectomy: A Cross Sectional Study Umbilical Vessels Traversing Cervical Os: Vasa Previa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1