根据TFEU第114条,为什么拟议的DMA可能是非法的,以及如何解决它

A. Pablo, N. Fernández
{"title":"根据TFEU第114条,为什么拟议的DMA可能是非法的,以及如何解决它","authors":"A. Pablo, N. Fernández","doi":"10.1093/jeclap/lpab059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (“DMA”) Proposal relies on the legal basis provided by Article 114 TFEU. The choice of this legal basis enables the EU legislature to avoid the unanimity requirement and to involve the European Parliament as co-legislator, but it also determines the limitations on the scope for EU action. An analysis of the DMA Proposal in light of the relevant EU case law regarding Article 114 TFEU suggests that the current text is likely to be incompatible with EU law. This paper submits that, to ensure that the DMA Proposal is compatible with EU law, the EU legislature needs to ensure (i) that the DMA is effectively designed to harmonize national rules and prevent regulatory fragmentation; and (ii) that the DMA’s scope and list of obligations comply with the principle of proportionality and do not interfere with the fundamental rights of the companies affected beyond what is necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Absent these changes, the DMA would, in our view, be vulnerable to an eventual legal challenge before the EU Courts.","PeriodicalId":51907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why the Proposed DMA Might Be Illegal under Article 114 TFEU, and How to Fix It\",\"authors\":\"A. Pablo, N. Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jeclap/lpab059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (“DMA”) Proposal relies on the legal basis provided by Article 114 TFEU. The choice of this legal basis enables the EU legislature to avoid the unanimity requirement and to involve the European Parliament as co-legislator, but it also determines the limitations on the scope for EU action. An analysis of the DMA Proposal in light of the relevant EU case law regarding Article 114 TFEU suggests that the current text is likely to be incompatible with EU law. This paper submits that, to ensure that the DMA Proposal is compatible with EU law, the EU legislature needs to ensure (i) that the DMA is effectively designed to harmonize national rules and prevent regulatory fragmentation; and (ii) that the DMA’s scope and list of obligations comply with the principle of proportionality and do not interfere with the fundamental rights of the companies affected beyond what is necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Absent these changes, the DMA would, in our view, be vulnerable to an eventual legal challenge before the EU Courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Competition Law & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

欧盟委员会的《数字市场法》(“DMA”)提案基于TFEU第114条规定的法律基础。选择这一法律基础使欧盟立法机构能够避免一致性要求,并让欧洲议会作为联合立法机构参与,但这也决定了欧盟行动范围的限制。根据欧盟关于TFEU第114条的相关判例法对DMA提案进行的分析表明,目前的文本可能与欧盟法律不兼容。本文认为,为了确保DMA提案与欧盟法律相兼容,欧盟立法机构需要确保(i)DMA的有效设计旨在协调国家规则,防止监管碎片化;以及(ii)DMA的范围和义务清单符合比例原则,不会干扰受影响公司的基本权利,超出确保内部市场正常运作的必要范围。在我们看来,如果没有这些变化,DMA将很容易受到欧盟法院的最终法律挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why the Proposed DMA Might Be Illegal under Article 114 TFEU, and How to Fix It
The European Commission’s Digital Markets Act (“DMA”) Proposal relies on the legal basis provided by Article 114 TFEU. The choice of this legal basis enables the EU legislature to avoid the unanimity requirement and to involve the European Parliament as co-legislator, but it also determines the limitations on the scope for EU action. An analysis of the DMA Proposal in light of the relevant EU case law regarding Article 114 TFEU suggests that the current text is likely to be incompatible with EU law. This paper submits that, to ensure that the DMA Proposal is compatible with EU law, the EU legislature needs to ensure (i) that the DMA is effectively designed to harmonize national rules and prevent regulatory fragmentation; and (ii) that the DMA’s scope and list of obligations comply with the principle of proportionality and do not interfere with the fundamental rights of the companies affected beyond what is necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market. Absent these changes, the DMA would, in our view, be vulnerable to an eventual legal challenge before the EU Courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The Elephant in the Room Turns Twenty: The Effect on Trade and the Enforcement of the EU Competition Law by the National Competition Authorities Two Paths of Enforcement, Procedural Autonomy and the Risk of Fragmentation Parental Liability and Hold-Separate Commitments: Cases 1407-14/1/12/21 Allergan and Others v Competition and Markets Authority, [2023] CAT 56 Reviving Interim Measures in EU Antitrust Proceedings European Commission Requests for Information Ordering the Production of Internal Documents Responsive to Search Terms: Cases T-451/20 and T-452/20 Meta v Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1