相似多于不同:不同流派和学科领域对高校图书馆员的学生认知

Q2 Social Sciences Reference Librarian Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02763877.2021.2008580
Elizabeth Price, J. Fagan
{"title":"相似多于不同:不同流派和学科领域对高校图书馆员的学生认知","authors":"Elizabeth Price, J. Fagan","doi":"10.1080/02763877.2021.2008580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explored differences in how undergraduate students of different genders and academic disciplines perceived academic librarians at a U.S. public university. No evidence indicated differences between students identifying as male or female, and few statistically significant differences were found among four Subject Areas (Arts, Humanities + Social Sciences, Business, Health + Education, and STEM). Our results have implications for local practice though they are not generalizable to other institutions. Despite a lack of significant findings, librarians should continue to explore ways to measure how students of different disciplines perceive academic libraries and/or librarians as valuable to their academic success.","PeriodicalId":35386,"journal":{"name":"Reference Librarian","volume":"62 1","pages":"221 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Alike than Different: Student Perceptions of Academic Librarians by Genders and Subject Areas\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Price, J. Fagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02763877.2021.2008580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explored differences in how undergraduate students of different genders and academic disciplines perceived academic librarians at a U.S. public university. No evidence indicated differences between students identifying as male or female, and few statistically significant differences were found among four Subject Areas (Arts, Humanities + Social Sciences, Business, Health + Education, and STEM). Our results have implications for local practice though they are not generalizable to other institutions. Despite a lack of significant findings, librarians should continue to explore ways to measure how students of different disciplines perceive academic libraries and/or librarians as valuable to their academic success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reference Librarian\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reference Librarian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2021.2008580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reference Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2021.2008580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了不同性别和学科的本科生对美国公立大学学术图书馆员的看法差异。没有证据表明男女学生之间存在差异,在四个学科领域(艺术、人文+社会科学、商业、健康+教育和STEM)之间也没有发现统计学上的显著差异。我们的研究结果对当地的实践有启示,尽管它们不能推广到其他机构。尽管缺乏重要的发现,但图书馆员应该继续探索衡量不同学科的学生如何看待学术图书馆和/或图书馆员对他们的学术成功有价值的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More Alike than Different: Student Perceptions of Academic Librarians by Genders and Subject Areas
ABSTRACT This study explored differences in how undergraduate students of different genders and academic disciplines perceived academic librarians at a U.S. public university. No evidence indicated differences between students identifying as male or female, and few statistically significant differences were found among four Subject Areas (Arts, Humanities + Social Sciences, Business, Health + Education, and STEM). Our results have implications for local practice though they are not generalizable to other institutions. Despite a lack of significant findings, librarians should continue to explore ways to measure how students of different disciplines perceive academic libraries and/or librarians as valuable to their academic success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reference Librarian
Reference Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The Reference Librarian aims to be a standard resource for everyone interested in the practice of reference work, from library and information science students to practicing reference librarians and full-time researchers. It enables readers to keep up with the changing face of reference, presenting new ideas for consideration. The Reference Librarian publishes articles about all aspects of the reference process, some research-based and some applied. Current trends and traditional questions are equally welcome. Many articles concern new electronic tools and resources, best practices in instruction and reference service, analysis of marketing of services, and effectiveness studies.
期刊最新文献
PAUSE for Your Health: A New End-User Tool for Evaluating Consumer Health News and Online Resources The Future of Libraries Did Not Happen–But Don’t Let History Repeat Itself At What Cost? : Missouri Librarians and the Struggle for Intellectual Freedom Robots and Human Librarians for Delivering Library Services to Patrons Improving a Library FAQ: Assessment and Reflection of the First Year’s Use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1