延迟食管切除术与低生存率相关:一项全国癌症数据库研究

D. Dolan, Nithya Kanagasegar, Gianna Dingillo, Christine E. Alvarado, Avanti Badrinathan, A. Bassiri, Jonathan D Rice, Jillian N. Sinopoli, Leonidas Tapias, P. Linden, C. Towe
{"title":"延迟食管切除术与低生存率相关:一项全国癌症数据库研究","authors":"D. Dolan, Nithya Kanagasegar, Gianna Dingillo, Christine E. Alvarado, Avanti Badrinathan, A. Bassiri, Jonathan D Rice, Jillian N. Sinopoli, Leonidas Tapias, P. Linden, C. Towe","doi":"10.1177/26345161231171846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery 4 to 8 weeks later. Occasionally surgery is delayed >12 weeks; outcomes of this approach are not well studied. We hypothesized that delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation would have inferior long-term overall survival relative to planned trimodality esophagectomy. Adult patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2−4aN0M0, T0−4aN+M0) who received multi-agent chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy were identified in the 2018 National Cancer Database. Esophagectomy performed within 90 days from end of chemoradiation were categorized as “trimodality” and those ≥90 days were categorized as “delayed.” Primary outcome was overall survival measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin status, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Included were 19 698 patients, 3905 (19.8%) “delayed.” Median time to surgery for trimodality patients was 51 days (IQR 41-63) versus 110 days (IQR 98-131) for delayed patients. Delayed patients tended to be older, non-white, have non-private insurance, and have more comorbidities. Overall survival was shorter for delayed patients (34.8 months) versus trimodality patients (43.1 months, P ≤ .001). In multivariable analysis, delay was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.23). Length of stay and readmission rate were similar between cohorts, but delay was associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (6.7% vs 4.6%, P ≤ .001). In the National Cancer Database, delayed esophagectomy is associated with inferior long-term survival. Nonetheless, delayed esophagectomy may be appropriate for select patients; further research is needed to identify the optimal approach.","PeriodicalId":73049,"journal":{"name":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delayed Esophagectomy is Associated With Inferior Survival: A National Cancer Database Study\",\"authors\":\"D. Dolan, Nithya Kanagasegar, Gianna Dingillo, Christine E. Alvarado, Avanti Badrinathan, A. Bassiri, Jonathan D Rice, Jillian N. Sinopoli, Leonidas Tapias, P. Linden, C. Towe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26345161231171846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery 4 to 8 weeks later. Occasionally surgery is delayed >12 weeks; outcomes of this approach are not well studied. We hypothesized that delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation would have inferior long-term overall survival relative to planned trimodality esophagectomy. Adult patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2−4aN0M0, T0−4aN+M0) who received multi-agent chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy were identified in the 2018 National Cancer Database. Esophagectomy performed within 90 days from end of chemoradiation were categorized as “trimodality” and those ≥90 days were categorized as “delayed.” Primary outcome was overall survival measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin status, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Included were 19 698 patients, 3905 (19.8%) “delayed.” Median time to surgery for trimodality patients was 51 days (IQR 41-63) versus 110 days (IQR 98-131) for delayed patients. Delayed patients tended to be older, non-white, have non-private insurance, and have more comorbidities. Overall survival was shorter for delayed patients (34.8 months) versus trimodality patients (43.1 months, P ≤ .001). In multivariable analysis, delay was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.23). Length of stay and readmission rate were similar between cohorts, but delay was associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (6.7% vs 4.6%, P ≤ .001). In the National Cancer Database, delayed esophagectomy is associated with inferior long-term survival. Nonetheless, delayed esophagectomy may be appropriate for select patients; further research is needed to identify the optimal approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231171846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161231171846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部晚期癌症通常采用新辅助放化疗,然后进行4至8次手术 几周后。偶尔手术延迟>12 周;这种方法的结果没有得到很好的研究。我们假设,与计划的三模式食管切除术相比,放化疗后延迟食管切除术的长期总生存率较低。2018年国家癌症数据库中确定了接受多药化疗、放疗和食管切除术的局部晚期癌症成年患者(T2−4aN0M0,T0−4aN+M0)。90年内完成食道切除术 化疗结束后的天数被归类为“三模态”,且≥90天 天被归类为“延迟”。主要结果是使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型测量的总生存率。次要结果包括手术边缘状态、住院时间和再次入院。包括19 698名患者,3905名(19.8%)“延迟”。三模态患者的中位手术时间为51 天(IQR 41-63)与110 天(IQR 98-131)。延迟就诊的患者往往年龄较大,非白人,有非私人保险,合并症较多。延迟患者的总生存期较短(34.8 月)与三模态患者(43.1 月,P ≤ .001)。在多变量分析中,延迟与较差的总生存率相关(HR 1.15,95%CI 1.08-1.23)。不同队列的住院时间和再入院率相似,但延迟与较高的手术切缘阳性率相关(6.7%vs 4.6%,P ≤ .001)。在国家癌症数据库中,延迟食管切除术与较低的长期生存率相关。尽管如此,延迟食管切除术可能适用于选定的患者;需要进一步的研究来确定最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delayed Esophagectomy is Associated With Inferior Survival: A National Cancer Database Study
Locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer is typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery 4 to 8 weeks later. Occasionally surgery is delayed >12 weeks; outcomes of this approach are not well studied. We hypothesized that delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation would have inferior long-term overall survival relative to planned trimodality esophagectomy. Adult patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (T2−4aN0M0, T0−4aN+M0) who received multi-agent chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy were identified in the 2018 National Cancer Database. Esophagectomy performed within 90 days from end of chemoradiation were categorized as “trimodality” and those ≥90 days were categorized as “delayed.” Primary outcome was overall survival measured using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Secondary outcomes included surgical margin status, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Included were 19 698 patients, 3905 (19.8%) “delayed.” Median time to surgery for trimodality patients was 51 days (IQR 41-63) versus 110 days (IQR 98-131) for delayed patients. Delayed patients tended to be older, non-white, have non-private insurance, and have more comorbidities. Overall survival was shorter for delayed patients (34.8 months) versus trimodality patients (43.1 months, P ≤ .001). In multivariable analysis, delay was associated with inferior overall survival (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.23). Length of stay and readmission rate were similar between cohorts, but delay was associated with a higher rate of positive surgical margins (6.7% vs 4.6%, P ≤ .001). In the National Cancer Database, delayed esophagectomy is associated with inferior long-term survival. Nonetheless, delayed esophagectomy may be appropriate for select patients; further research is needed to identify the optimal approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Image Enhanced Endoscopy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Empiric Esophageal Dilation for the Treatment of Non-Obstructive Dysphagia Presidential Address 2023: “Just by Showing Up” Invited Commentary: Reflux Disease Questionnaire Scoring and Utilization: A Scoping Review Gastric Electrical Stimulation is an Effective Treatment Modality for Symptoms of GERD in Patients With Gastroparesis and VACTERL Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1