{"title":"跨性别怪物:跨性别情感与弗兰肯斯坦","authors":"Anson Koch-Rein","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The monster is a ubiquitous figure in transgender rhetorics. Mary Shelley’s nameless creature, who has circulated under the name of his scientistcreator ‘Frankenstein’ since the 1830s, is often the specific trope used to cast transgender people as “monstrous, crazy, or less than human” (Rubin 12). Shelley’s nameless creature has been used to denounce transgender people as “synthetic products” of a “medical empire” (Raymond 12, 165) and as products of a “Frankenstein phenomenon” of “ghoulish gynaecologists” (Daly 69, 70). References to Frankenstein also frequently appear in transgender narratives and trans-affirmative scholarship (Barad, Cromwell, Noble), from titles like Susan Stryker’s “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix” to Rebecca Duke’s “Rendering ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’ Intelligible” and from memoir (Bono, Breedlove, Link & Raz, McBee) to poetry (Cannon, Ladin). For artist Anthony Clair Wagner, struggling with ‘monster,’ “this derogatory word,” is about nothing less than the question: “How can we own the transgender imaginary?” (341). The particularly prominent, affectively intense place of Frankenstein in the transgender imaginary is the starting point for this essay. While transphobic uses of Frankenstein’s monster as a trope generally draw on ideas of monstrous bodies and physical monstrosity, transgender metaphors of the monster use his rage-fueled agency to carve out a transgender speaking position in the face of the silencing gestures of transphobia. Trans studies scholar Harlan Weaver, for example, notes: “Stryker’s essay has made an indelible mark in transgender theories in the ways it takes up the monster’s rage as a means to elucidate a new form of doing and understanding trans bodies” (133). Rage is not the only means of understanding trans affect through Frankenstein, however. As a figure laden with negative affect, the monster offers transgender readers a way of addressing feelings of shame, gender dysphoria, and alienation from heteronormative gender and sexuality. Stryker uses the monster as a figure of bodily","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"30 1","pages":"44 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trans-lating the Monster: Transgender Affect and Frankenstein\",\"authors\":\"Anson Koch-Rein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The monster is a ubiquitous figure in transgender rhetorics. Mary Shelley’s nameless creature, who has circulated under the name of his scientistcreator ‘Frankenstein’ since the 1830s, is often the specific trope used to cast transgender people as “monstrous, crazy, or less than human” (Rubin 12). Shelley’s nameless creature has been used to denounce transgender people as “synthetic products” of a “medical empire” (Raymond 12, 165) and as products of a “Frankenstein phenomenon” of “ghoulish gynaecologists” (Daly 69, 70). References to Frankenstein also frequently appear in transgender narratives and trans-affirmative scholarship (Barad, Cromwell, Noble), from titles like Susan Stryker’s “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix” to Rebecca Duke’s “Rendering ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’ Intelligible” and from memoir (Bono, Breedlove, Link & Raz, McBee) to poetry (Cannon, Ladin). For artist Anthony Clair Wagner, struggling with ‘monster,’ “this derogatory word,” is about nothing less than the question: “How can we own the transgender imaginary?” (341). The particularly prominent, affectively intense place of Frankenstein in the transgender imaginary is the starting point for this essay. While transphobic uses of Frankenstein’s monster as a trope generally draw on ideas of monstrous bodies and physical monstrosity, transgender metaphors of the monster use his rage-fueled agency to carve out a transgender speaking position in the face of the silencing gestures of transphobia. Trans studies scholar Harlan Weaver, for example, notes: “Stryker’s essay has made an indelible mark in transgender theories in the ways it takes up the monster’s rage as a means to elucidate a new form of doing and understanding trans bodies” (133). Rage is not the only means of understanding trans affect through Frankenstein, however. As a figure laden with negative affect, the monster offers transgender readers a way of addressing feelings of shame, gender dysphoria, and alienation from heteronormative gender and sexuality. Stryker uses the monster as a figure of bodily\",\"PeriodicalId\":42717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2019.1560878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
怪物是跨性别修辞中无处不在的人物。玛丽·雪莱的无名生物自19世纪30年代以来一直以其科学创造者“弗兰肯斯坦”的名义流传,经常被用来将变性人塑造成“怪物、疯子或不如人”(鲁宾12)。雪莱的无名生物被用来谴责跨性别者是“医学帝国”的“合成产物”(Raymond 12165)和“残忍的妇科医生”的“弗兰肯斯坦现象”的产物(Daly 6970)。对弗兰肯斯坦的提及也经常出现在跨性别叙事和跨性别平权学术中(Barad,Cromwell,Noble),从苏珊·斯特里克(Susan Stryker)的《我对查穆尼克斯村上方的维克托·弗兰肯斯坦的话》(My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix)到丽贝卡·杜克(Rebecca Duke。对于艺术家安东尼·克莱尔·瓦格纳来说,与“怪物”作斗争,“这个贬义词”无非是一个问题:“我们如何才能拥有变性人的想象?”(341)。弗兰肯斯坦在跨性别想象中特别突出、情感强烈的位置是这篇文章的起点。虽然对弗兰肯斯坦怪物的跨性别恐惧使用通常借鉴了怪物的身体和身体怪物的概念,但对怪物的跨变性隐喻利用他愤怒的代理,在面对跨性别恐惧的沉默姿态时,开辟了一个跨性别的发言位置。例如,跨性别研究学者哈兰·韦弗(Harlan Weaver)指出:“史崔克的文章在跨性别理论中留下了不可磨灭的印记,因为它利用怪物的愤怒来阐明一种新的方式来做和理解跨性别身体”(133)。然而,愤怒并不是通过《弗兰肯斯坦》理解跨性别情感的唯一手段。作为一个充满负面影响的人物,这个怪物为跨性别读者提供了一种解决羞耻感、性别焦虑以及对非规范性别和性行为的疏离感的方法。史崔克使用怪物作为身体的形象
Trans-lating the Monster: Transgender Affect and Frankenstein
The monster is a ubiquitous figure in transgender rhetorics. Mary Shelley’s nameless creature, who has circulated under the name of his scientistcreator ‘Frankenstein’ since the 1830s, is often the specific trope used to cast transgender people as “monstrous, crazy, or less than human” (Rubin 12). Shelley’s nameless creature has been used to denounce transgender people as “synthetic products” of a “medical empire” (Raymond 12, 165) and as products of a “Frankenstein phenomenon” of “ghoulish gynaecologists” (Daly 69, 70). References to Frankenstein also frequently appear in transgender narratives and trans-affirmative scholarship (Barad, Cromwell, Noble), from titles like Susan Stryker’s “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Village of Chamounix” to Rebecca Duke’s “Rendering ‘Frankenstein’s Monster’ Intelligible” and from memoir (Bono, Breedlove, Link & Raz, McBee) to poetry (Cannon, Ladin). For artist Anthony Clair Wagner, struggling with ‘monster,’ “this derogatory word,” is about nothing less than the question: “How can we own the transgender imaginary?” (341). The particularly prominent, affectively intense place of Frankenstein in the transgender imaginary is the starting point for this essay. While transphobic uses of Frankenstein’s monster as a trope generally draw on ideas of monstrous bodies and physical monstrosity, transgender metaphors of the monster use his rage-fueled agency to carve out a transgender speaking position in the face of the silencing gestures of transphobia. Trans studies scholar Harlan Weaver, for example, notes: “Stryker’s essay has made an indelible mark in transgender theories in the ways it takes up the monster’s rage as a means to elucidate a new form of doing and understanding trans bodies” (133). Rage is not the only means of understanding trans affect through Frankenstein, however. As a figure laden with negative affect, the monster offers transgender readers a way of addressing feelings of shame, gender dysphoria, and alienation from heteronormative gender and sexuality. Stryker uses the monster as a figure of bodily